| Literature DB >> 26537951 |
Tadesse Eguale1, Wondwossen A Gebreyes2, Daniel Asrat3, Haile Alemayehu4, John S Gunn5, Ephrem Engidawork6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Non-typhoidal Salmonella (NTS) is an important public health problem worldwide. Consumption of animal-derived food products and direct and/or indirect contact with animals are the major routes of acquiring infection with NTS. Published information, particularly on the serotype distribution of NTS among human patients with gastroenteritis and associated risk factors, is scarce in Ethiopia. This study investigated the prevalence, risk factors, serotype distribution and antimicrobial susceptibility of Salmonella species among diarrheic out-patients attending health centers in Addis Ababa and patients with various gastrointestinal complaints at Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital (TASH).Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26537951 PMCID: PMC4634906 DOI: 10.1186/s12879-015-1235-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Infect Dis ISSN: 1471-2334 Impact factor: 3.090
Frequency of Salmonella infection among diarrheic out-patients attending health centers in Addis Ababa with respect to selected factors
| Factor | Total | No (%) |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Sex | |||
| Male | 329 | 24(7.3) | 0.92 |
| Female | 436 | 31(7.1) | |
| Consumption of raw meat | |||
| No | 622 | 44(7.1) | 0.80 |
| Yes | 143 | 11(7.7) | |
| Consumption of raw milk | |||
| No | 720 | 51(7.1) | 0.19 |
| Yes | 45 | 4(8.9) | |
| Consumption of raw vegetables | |||
| No | 571 | 34(6.0) | 0.025 |
| Yes | 194 | 21(10.8) | |
| Vomiting | |||
| No | 714 | 51(7.1) | 0.85 |
| Yes | 51 | 4(7.8) | |
| Age | |||
| 0–5 years | 160 | 10(6.3) | |
| 6–18 years | 171 | 12(7.0) | 0.77 |
| 19–45 | 359 | 27(7.5) | |
| >45 | 75 | 6(8) | |
| Stool consistency | |||
| Mucoid | 283 | 10(3.5) | |
| Loose | 117 | 9(7.7) | 0.005 |
| Watery | 365 | 36(9.9) | |
|
| |||
| Positive | 145 | 14(9.7) | 0.058 |
| Negative | 620 | 41(6.6) | |
|
| |||
| Positive | 62 | 3(4.8) | 0.46 |
| Negative | 703 | 52(7.4) |
Association of selected risk factors with Salmonella infection in diarrheic out-patients in Addis Ababa health centers
| Variable | Crude odds Ratio and 95 % confidence interval | Adjusted odds Ratio and 95 % confidence interval | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex | ||||
| Male | 1.03 | 0.61–1.74 | 1.02 | 0.57–1.85 |
| Female | ||||
| Consumption of raw meat | ||||
| No | 1.1 | 0.58–2.08 | 0.86 | 0.55–1.36 |
| Yes | ||||
| Consumption of raw milk | ||||
| No | 1.28 | 0.53–3.01 | 1.29 | 0.51–3.26 |
| Yes | ||||
| Consumption of raw vegetable | ||||
| No | 1.92 | 1.36–2.70 | 1.91 | 1.29–2.83 |
| Yes | ||||
| Vomiting | ||||
| No | 1.11 | 0.37–3.32 | 0.93 | 0.34–2.52 |
| Yes | ||||
| Age | ||||
| 0–5 years | ||||
| 6–18 years | 1.14 | 0.41–3.13 | 1.03 | 0.38–2.81 |
| 19–45 | 1.22 | 0.53–2.81 | 1.02 | 0.44–2.35 |
| >45 | 1.32 | 0.32–5.57 | 1.27 | 0.33–4.93 |
| Stool consistency | ||||
| Mucoid | ||||
| Loose | 2.28 | 0.90–5.76 | 2.33 | 0.91–5.97 |
| Watery | 2.99 | 1.23–7.27 | 3.05 | 1.22–7.60 |
|
| ||||
| Positive | 1.85 | 0.84–4.08 | 1.77 | 0.85–3.67 |
| Negative | ||||
|
| ||||
| Positive | 0.64 | 0.25–1.60 | 0.64 | 0.26–1.56 |
| Negative | ||||
Fig. 1Prevalence of Salmonella among out-patients attending primary health centers in Addis Ababa
Common pathogens detected from stool samples of the study participants
| Health Centers | TASH | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pathogen infection status | Number examined | Number (%) positive | aNumber examined | Number (%) positive |
|
| 765 | 145(19) | 188 | 1(0.5) |
|
| 765 | 62(8.1) | 188 | 8(4.3) |
|
| 765 | 7(0.9) | 188 | 0(0) |
| Strongloid worm/eggs | 765 | 5(0.7) | 188 | 0(0) |
| Hook worm | 765 | 3(0.4) | 188 | 0(0) |
| Ascaris egg | 765 | 2(0.3) | 188 | 0(0) |
| Eggs of Tanea | 765 | 0(0) | 188 | 2(1.1) |
aOnly 188 of 192 samples at TASH were examined for ova and parasites
Relative proportion of Salmonella serotypes isolated from diarrheic patients in Addis Ababa and their resistance profile
| Serotype | No. | An | Amp | Amc | C | Cro | Cf | Cip | Fox | Gm | K | Sxt | Tmp | Te | Su | S | Nitro | Na | N |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Braenderup | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Concord | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Enteritidis | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Kentucky | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 |
| Kottbus | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 2 |
| Miami | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Newport | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Sainpaul | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Typhimurium | 27 | 0 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 13 | 18 | 9 | 1 | 1 |
| V:ROUGH-O;-:- | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Virchow | 21 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 14 | 11 | 10 | 3 |
| Total | 67 | 0 | 11 | 8 | 2 | 2 | 12 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 23 | 3 | 3 | 9 | 26 | 50 | 27 | 16 | 9 |
| (%) | 100 | 0 | 16.4 | 11.9 | 3 | 3 | 17.9 | 4.5 | 3 | 7.5 | 34.3 | 4.5 | 4.5 | 13.4 | 38.9 | 74.6 | 40.3 | 23.9 | 13.4 |
An amikacin, Amp ampicillin, Amc amoxicillin and clavulanic acid, Cf cephalothin, C, chloramphenicol, Cro ceftriaxone, Cip ciprofloxacin, Gm gentamicin, K kanamycin, Tmp trimethoprim, Sxt sulfamethoxazole + trimethoprim, Te tetracycline, Su-sulfisoxazole, Nitro nitrofurantoin, Na- nalidixic acid, N neomycin