Literature DB >> 22428668

Temporal target integration underlies performance at Lag 1 in the attentional blink.

Elkan G Akyürek1, Sander A H Eshuis, Mark R Nieuwenstein, Jefta D Saija, Deniz Başkent, Bernhard Hommel.   

Abstract

When two targets follow each other directly in rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP), they are often identified correctly but reported in the wrong order. These order reversals are commonly explained in terms of the rate at which the two targets are processed, the idea being that the second target can sometimes overtake the first in the race toward conscious awareness. The present study examined whether some of these order reversals might alternatively be due to a mechanism of temporal integration whereby targets appearing closely in time may be merged into a single representation. To test this integration account, we used an attentional blink task in which the two targets could be combined perceptually in a meaningful way such that the conjunction of the two target elements constituted a possible target stimulus itself. The results showed that when targets appeared at Lag 1, observers frequently reported seeing only a single merged target stimulus, and these reports occurred up to approximately three times as often as (real) order reversals. When the possibility to report the integrated percept was removed, order reversals consequently tripled. These results suggest that integration may actually be the primary cause of order reversals in dual-target RSVP tasks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22428668     DOI: 10.1037/a0027610

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  22 in total

1.  Situational context is important: perceptual grouping modulates temporal perception.

Authors:  Bin Zhou; Shaojuan Yang; Ting Zhang; Xin Zhang; Lihua Mao
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2015-09

2.  Tracking the first two seconds: three stages of visual information processing?

Authors:  Jane Jacob; Bruno G Breitmeyer; Melissa Treviño
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-12

3.  The attentional blink: why does Lag-1 sparing occur when the dependent measure is accuracy, but Lag-1 deficit when it is RT?

Authors:  Hayley E P Lagroix; Vincent Di Lollo; Thomas M Spalek
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2018-05-26

4.  Bilingualism and the increased attentional blink effect: evidence that the difference between bilinguals and monolinguals generalizes to different levels of second language proficiency.

Authors:  Vatsala Khare; Ark Verma; Bhoomika Kar; Narayanan Srinivasan; Marc Brysbaert
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2012-11-30

5.  Task set flexibility and feature specificity modulate the limits of temporal attention.

Authors:  Elkan G Akyürek; Charlotte Köhne; Anna Schubö
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2012-08-08

6.  Attentional control and competition between episodic representations.

Authors:  Elkan G Akyürek; Anna Schubö; Bernhard Hommel
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2012-08-02

7.  Two visual targets for the price of one? Pupil dilation shows reduced mental effort through temporal integration.

Authors:  Michael J Wolff; Sabine Scholz; Elkan G Akyürek; Hedderik van Rijn
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-02

8.  Visual and auditory temporal integration in healthy younger and older adults.

Authors:  Jefta D Saija; Deniz Başkent; Tjeerd C Andringa; Elkan G Akyürek
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2017-09-04

9.  Modelling the simultaneous encoding/serial experience theory of the perceptual moment: a blink of meta-experience.

Authors:  Howard Bowman; William Jones; Hannah Pincham; Steve Fleming; Axel Cleeremans; Murray Smith
Journal:  Neurosci Conscious       Date:  2022-03-02

10.  Attentional blink and impulsiveness: evidence for higher functional impulsivity in non-blinkers compared to blinkers.

Authors:  Stefan J Troche; Thomas H Rammsayer
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2013-02-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.