Literature DB >> 23877713

Tracking the first two seconds: three stages of visual information processing?

Jane Jacob1, Bruno G Breitmeyer, Melissa Treviño.   

Abstract

We compared visual priming and comparison tasks to assess information processing of a stimulus during the first 2 s after its onset. In both tasks, a 13-ms prime was followed at varying SOAs by a 40-ms probe. In the priming task, observers identified the probe as rapidly and accurately as possible; in the comparison task, observers determined as rapidly and accurately as possible whether or not the probe and prime were identical. Priming effects attained a maximum at an SOA of 133 ms and then declined monotonically to zero by 700 ms, indicating reliance on relatively brief visuosensory (iconic) memory. In contrast, the comparison effects yielded a multiphasic function, showing a maximum at 0 ms followed by a minimum at 133 ms, followed in turn by a maximum at 240 ms and another minimum at 720 ms, and finally a third maximum at 1,200 ms before declining thereafter. The results indicate three stages of prime processing that we take to correspond to iconic visible persistence, iconic informational persistence, and visual working memory, with the first two used in the priming task and all three in the comparison task. These stages are related to stages presumed to underlie stimulus processing in other tasks, such as those giving rise to the attentional blink.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23877713     DOI: 10.3758/s13423-013-0482-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  25 in total

1.  Different time courses for visual perception and action priming.

Authors:  Dirk Vorberg; Uwe Mattler; Armin Heinecke; Thomas Schmidt; Jens Schwarzbach
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-04-28       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Psychology and neurobiology of simple decisions.

Authors:  Philip L Smith; Roger Ratcliff
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 13.837

3.  Temporal target integration underlies performance at Lag 1 in the attentional blink.

Authors:  Elkan G Akyürek; Sander A H Eshuis; Mark R Nieuwenstein; Jefta D Saija; Deniz Başkent; Bernhard Hommel
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2012-03-19       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  The time it takes to switch attention.

Authors:  Gordon D Logan
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-08

5.  Temporal constraints on conscious vision: on the ubiquitous nature of the attentional blink.

Authors:  Mark Nieuwenstein; Erik Van der Burg; Jan Theeuwes; Brad Wyble; Mary Potter
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-08-31       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Imaging unconscious semantic priming.

Authors:  S Dehaene; L Naccache; G Le Clec'H; E Koechlin; M Mueller; G Dehaene-Lambertz; P F van de Moortele; D Le Bihan
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1998-10-08       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Temporal characteristics of iconic memory.

Authors:  V Di Lollo
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1977-05-19       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  A two-stage model for multiple target detection in rapid serial visual presentation.

Authors:  M M Chun; M C Potter
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Chronometric analysis of classification.

Authors:  M I Posner; R F Mitchell
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1967-09       Impact factor: 8.934

10.  Perceptual criteria in the human brain.

Authors:  Corey N White; Jeanette A Mumford; Russell A Poldrack
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  3 in total

1.  Temporal processing characteristics of the Ponzo illusion.

Authors:  Filipp Schmidt; Anke Haberkamp
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2015-03-13

2.  Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Cortical Representations during and after Stimulus Presentation.

Authors:  Marieke E van de Nieuwenhuijzen; Eva W P van den Borne; Ole Jensen; Marcel A J van Gerven
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2016-05-09

3.  Early Visual Processing and Perception Processes in Object Discrimination Learning.

Authors:  Matías Quiñones; David Gómez; Rodrigo Montefusco-Siegmund; María de la Luz Aylwin
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 4.677

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.