Processing false solutions in additions: differences between high- and lower-skilled arithmetic problem-solvers.

This paper focuses on the capacity to solve numerical incongruities in high- and lower-skilled arithmetic problem-solvers by investigating event-related brain potentials elicited by incorrect solutions to additions. Fifteen high-skill and fifteen low-skill individuals were presented with simple addition problems in a verification task. The proposed solution was manipulated by presenting correct solutions and incorrect solutions very close to the correct ones. Incorrect solutions elicited a negative component followed by a late positive component (LPC/P3b), whose amplitude was smaller for the low-skill group than for the high-skill group. Because the LPC/P3b amplitude has been taken as an indicator of the plausibility of the stimulus, this result suggests that incorrect solutions close to the correct ones appear more plausible to low-skilled individuals than to their high-skilled counterparts. This result is interpreted in terms of differences in the strength of association between problems and potential solutions depending on arithmetical skill.