Literature DB >> 17360062

An event-related brain potential study of the arithmetic split effect.

M Isabel Núñez-Peña1, Carles Escera.   

Abstract

This study explores the split effect on arithmetical sequence processing using event-related brain potentials (ERPs). This effect has been reported in arithmetic problem verification tasks and refers to an increase in reaction time when an incorrect solution close to the correct one is presented. The use of different strategies has been suggested to account for this effect: a whole-calculation strategy for close incorrect solutions (small-split problems), and a plausibility-checking strategy for far or obviously incorrect solutions (large-split problems). In the present study, participants were asked to verify whether the last item of a numerical sequence was correct or not, according to the rule established by the preceding numbers. Subjects were presented with sequences of numbers, and the distance between the proposed and the correct ending was manipulated by presenting the correct ending, a small-split ending or a large-split ending. To avoid problems that violated the parity rule only even numbers were presented. Two ERP components were evident whenever the arithmetical sequence was broken: an early negativity peaking at about 270 ms and a subsequent late positivity component (LPC) peaking between 550 and 650 ms. The early negativity was larger at posterior sites. The late positivity had a centro-parietal scalp distribution, and its amplitude was sensitive to the numerical distance from the correct number: the greater the distance, the larger the positivity. The present results suggest that the centro-parietal LPC can be taken as an index of the split effect and may broaden our knowledge about arithmetical processing strategies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17360062     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2007.01.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol        ISSN: 0167-8760            Impact factor:   2.997


  9 in total

1.  Processing false solutions in additions: differences between high- and lower-skilled arithmetic problem-solvers.

Authors:  Maria Isabel Núñez-Peña; Macarena Suárez-Pellicioni
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-03-17       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  When 2 × 4 is meaningful: the N400 and P300 reveal operand format effects in multiplication verification.

Authors:  Danielle S Dickson; Vanessa R Cerda; Rosemary N Beavers; Andres Ruiz; Ricardo Castañeda; Nicole Y Y Wicha
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2018-08-22       Impact factor: 4.016

3.  The N3 is sensitive to odd-even congruency information in arithmetic fact retrieval.

Authors:  Yalin Chen; Jamie I D Campbell; Chang Liu
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-01-26       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Dissociation between arithmetic relatedness and distance effects is modulated by task properties: an ERP study comparing explicit vs. implicit arithmetic processing.

Authors:  Chiara Avancini; Giovanni Galfano; Dénes Szűcs
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 3.251

5.  Arithmetic processing in children with dyscalculia: an event-related potential study.

Authors:  Sonia Y Cárdenas; Juan Silva-Pereyra; Belén Prieto-Corona; Susana A Castro-Chavira; Thalía Fernández
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-01-27       Impact factor: 2.984

6.  When multiplying is meaningful in memory: Electrophysiological signature of the problem size effect in children.

Authors:  Danielle S Dickson; Amandine E Grenier; Bianca O Obinyan; Nicole Y Y Wicha
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2022-02-26

7.  Processing of multi-digit additions in high math-anxious individuals: psychophysiological evidence.

Authors:  María Isabel Núñez-Peña; Macarena Suárez-Pellicioni
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-08-21

8.  The arithmetic problem size effect in children: an event-related potential study.

Authors:  Leen Van Beek; Pol Ghesquièr; Bert De Smedt; Lieven Lagae
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-09-25       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Brain-mechanistic responses to varying difficulty levels of approximate solutions to arithmetic problems.

Authors:  Yanhui Xiang; Yiqi Jiang; Xiaomei Chao; Qihan Wu; Lei Mo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-04-13       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.