Literature DB >> 15653300

The effect of numerical distance and stimulus probability on ERP components elicited by numerical incongruencies in mental addition.

Dénes Szucs1, Valéria Csépe.   

Abstract

In two experiments, we investigated the effect of the numerical distance of incongruous results from correct results and stimulus probability on the N270/N400 event-related brain potential components. In Experiment 1, 12 subjects saw two one-digit addends and a possible solution and signaled if the proposed result (falling in the range of 3-17) was true or false. Incorrect results could deviate by +/-2 or by +/-9 from the correct answer. The probability of correct results was 50%. Twelve subjects carried out a similar task in Experiment 2 without giving behavioral responses. The probability of incorrect results was 20%, 50% or 80% in different conditions. Both raw potentials and incorrect minus correct difference potentials were analyzed. A fronto-central N3 and a centro-parietal dN3 (incorrect-correct difference) were present for incongruous results in both experiments. The amplitude of the dN3 was not sensitive to numerical distance, but the latency of the dN3 was longer when numerical distance was larger. The overall amplitude of the N3 and of the dN3 was not sensitive to the probability manipulation. However, there was a parietally localized effect of probability on N3 amplitude. The dN3 in mental addition is most probably identical to the arithmetic N400 effect reported earlier in mental multiplication. The distance effect in latency may be a correlate of the discrimination of correct vs. incorrect results. A parietally localized probability effect (right greater than left) was found in the N3 amplitude. The dN3 was insensitive to the probability manipulation. In accord with its insensitivity to stimulus probability, the dN3 seems to be more related to the N400 than to the N2b. Posterior attentional processes sensitive to the allocation of attentional resources may have contributed to the topography of the dN3. The N3 is more related to the detection of expectation violation, while the P3 reflects the ease of identifying stimulus categories.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15653300     DOI: 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2004.04.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res        ISSN: 0926-6410


  16 in total

1.  An ERP study on the processing of common fractions.

Authors:  Li Zhang; Ziqiang Xin; Fuhong Li; Qi Wang; Cody Ding; Hong Li
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-12-10       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Processing false solutions in additions: differences between high- and lower-skilled arithmetic problem-solvers.

Authors:  Maria Isabel Núñez-Peña; Macarena Suárez-Pellicioni
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-03-17       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  The N3 is sensitive to odd-even congruency information in arithmetic fact retrieval.

Authors:  Yalin Chen; Jamie I D Campbell; Chang Liu
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-01-26       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Individual differences in nonverbal number discrimination correlate with event-related potentials and measures of probabilistic reasoning.

Authors:  David J Paulsen; Marty G Woldorff; Elizabeth M Brannon
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 3.139

5.  Conceptual Integration of Arithmetic Operations With Real-World Knowledge: Evidence From Event-Related Potentials.

Authors:  Amy M Guthormsen; Kristie J Fisher; Miriam Bassok; Lee Osterhout; Melissa DeWolf; Keith J Holyoak
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2015-04-10

6.  The neural differences of arithmetic verification performance depend on math skill: Evidence from event-related potential.

Authors:  Shiva Taghizadeh; Touraj Hashemi; Ali Jahan; Mohammad Ali Nazari
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacol Rep       Date:  2021-01-18

7.  Arithmetic mismatch negativity and numerical magnitude processing in number matching.

Authors:  Yi-Fang Hsu; Dénes Szücs
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2011-08-11       Impact factor: 3.288

8.  An ERP study of the processing of common and decimal fractions: how different they are.

Authors:  Li Zhang; Qi Wang; Chongde Lin; Cody Ding; Xinlin Zhou
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Is order the defining feature of magnitude representation? An ERP study on learning numerical magnitude and spatial order of artificial symbols.

Authors:  Hui Zhao; Chuansheng Chen; Hongchuan Zhang; Xinlin Zhou; Leilei Mei; Chunhui Chen; Lan Chen; Zhongyu Cao; Qi Dong
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-19       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Processing of multi-digit additions in high math-anxious individuals: psychophysiological evidence.

Authors:  María Isabel Núñez-Peña; Macarena Suárez-Pellicioni
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-08-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.