Literature DB >> 21193706

Frequency-dependent evaluation of the role of definity in producing sonoporation of Chinese hamster ovary cells.

Monica M Forbes1, Ryan L Steinberg, William D O'Brien.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Sonoporation uses ultrasound (US) and ultrasound contrast agents (UCAs) to enhance cell permeabilization, thereby allowing delivery of therapeutic compounds non-invasively into specific target cells. The objective of this study was to elucidate the biophysical mechanism of sonoporation, specifically the role of UCAs as well as exposure frequency. The inertial cavitation (IC) thresholds of the lipid-shelled octafluoropropane UCA were directly compared to the levels of generated sonoporation to determine the involvement of UCAs in producing sonoporation.
METHODS: Chinese hamster ovary cells were exposed as a monolayer in a solution of the UCA, 500,000-Da fluorescein isothiocyanate-dextran, and phosphate-buffered saline to 30 seconds of pulsed US (pulse duration, 5 cycles; pulse repetition frequency, 10 Hz) at 3 frequencies (0.92, 3.2, and 5.6 MHz). The peak rarefactional pressure (P(r)) was varied over a range from 4 kPa to 4.1 MPa, and 5 to 7 independent replicates were performed at each pressure.
RESULTS: The experimental observations demonstrated that IC was likely not the physical mechanism for sonoporation. Sonoporation activity was observed at pressure levels below the threshold for IC of the UCA (1.27 ± 0.32 MPa at 0.92 MHz, 0.84 ± 0.19 MPa at 3.2 MHz, and 2.57 ± 0.26 MPa at 5.6 MHz) for all 3 frequencies examined. The P(r) values at which the peak sonoporation activity occurred were 1.4 MPa at 0.92 MHz, 0.25 MPa at 3.2 MHz, and 2.3 MPa at 5.6 MHz. The UCA collapse thresholds followed a similar trend. A 1-way analysis of variance test confirmed that sonoporation activity differed among the 3 frequencies examined (P = 10(-8)).
CONCLUSIONS: These results thus suggest that sonoporation is related to linear and/or nonlinear oscillation of the UCA occurring at pressure levels below the IC threshold.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21193706      PMCID: PMC3069854          DOI: 10.7863/jum.2011.30.1.61

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Ultrasound Med        ISSN: 0278-4297            Impact factor:   2.153


  32 in total

1.  Reparable sonoporation generated by microstreaming.

Authors:  Junru Wu; Joel P Ross; Jen-Fu Chiu
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Threshold of fragmentation for ultrasonic contrast agents.

Authors:  J E Chomas; P Dayton; D May; K Ferrara
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.170

3.  Controlled vesicle deformation and lysis by single oscillating bubbles.

Authors:  Philippe Marmottant; Sascha Hilgenfeldt
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-05-08       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  The pulse length-dependence of inertial cavitation dose and hemolysis.

Authors:  Wen-Shiang Chen; Andrew A Brayman; Thomas J Matula; Lawrence A Crum; Morton W Miller
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 2.998

5.  Cell disruption by ultrasound.

Authors:  D E HUGHES; W L NYBORG
Journal:  Science       Date:  1962-10-12       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Quantification of optison bubble size and lifetime during sonication dominant role of secondary cavitation bubbles causing acoustic bioeffects.

Authors:  Pavel P Kamaev; Joshua D Hutcheson; Michelle L Wilson; Mark R Prausnitz
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Ultrasonic contrast agent shell rupture detected by inertial cavitation and rebound signals.

Authors:  Azzdine Y Ammi; Robin O Cleveland; Jonathan Mamou; Grace I Wang; S Lori Bridal; William D O'Brien
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 2.725

8.  Low-intensity ultrasound induces angiogenesis in rat hind-limb ischemia.

Authors:  Sharon Barzelai; Orna Sharabani-Yosef; Radka Holbova; David Castel; Raphael Walden; Santiago Engelberg; Mickey Scheinowitz
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 2.998

9.  Superthreshold behavior and threshold estimation of ultrasound-induced lung hemorrhage in adult mice and rats.

Authors:  J F Zachary; J M Sempsrott; L A Frizzell; D G Simpson; W D O'Brien
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.725

10.  Ultrasound-mediated cavitation thresholds of liquid perfluorocarbon droplets in vitro.

Authors:  Tonia Giesecke; Kullervo Hynynen
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.998

View more
  12 in total

1.  Development of a theoretical model describing sonoporation activity of cells exposed to ultrasound in the presence of contrast agents.

Authors:  Monica M Forbes; William D O'Brien
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 2.  Mechanisms of microbubble-facilitated sonoporation for drug and gene delivery.

Authors:  Zhenzhen Fan; Ronald E Kumon; Cheri X Deng
Journal:  Ther Deliv       Date:  2014-04

3.  Estimating concentration of ultrasound contrast agents with backscatter coefficients: experimental and theoretical aspects.

Authors:  Scott M Leithem; Roberto J Lavarello; William D O'Brien; Michael L Oelze
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 4.  Can ultrasound enable efficient intracellular uptake of molecules? A retrospective literature review and analysis.

Authors:  Ying Liu; Jing Yan; Mark R Prausnitz
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2012-03-16       Impact factor: 2.998

5.  Microbubble-mediated ultrasonic techniques for improved chemotherapeutic delivery in cancer.

Authors:  Anna G Sorace; Jason M Warram; Heidi Umphrey; Kenneth Hoyt
Journal:  J Drug Target       Date:  2011-10-10       Impact factor: 5.121

6.  Spiral computed tomography evaluation of rabbit VX2 hepatic tumors treated with 20 kHz ultrasound and microbubbles.

Authors:  Zhi-Yong Shen; Chun Liu; Ming-Feng Wu; Hai-Feng Shi; Yu-Feng Zhou; Wei Zhuang; Gan-Lin Xia
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2017-07-08       Impact factor: 2.967

Review 7.  Current status and prospects for microbubbles in ultrasound theranostics.

Authors:  K Heath Martin; Paul A Dayton
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol       Date:  2013-03-15

8.  Nanoparticle-assisted ultrasound: A special focus on sonodynamic therapy against cancer.

Authors:  Giancarlo Canavese; Andrea Ancona; Luisa Racca; Marta Canta; Bianca Dumontel; Federica Barbaresco; Tania Limongi; Valentina Cauda
Journal:  Chem Eng J       Date:  2018-05-15       Impact factor: 13.273

9.  Sudden Cell Death Induced by Ca2+ Delivery via Microbubble Cavitation.

Authors:  Martynas Maciulevičius; Diana Navickaitė; Sonam Chopra; Baltramiejus Jakštys; Saulius Šatkauskas
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2021-01-04

Review 10.  Ultrasound and nanomaterial: an efficient pair to fight cancer.

Authors:  Edouard Alphandéry
Journal:  J Nanobiotechnology       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 10.435

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.