Literature DB >> 12574482

Auditory influences on visual temporal rate perception.

Gregg H Recanzone1.   

Abstract

Visual stimuli are known to influence the perception of auditory stimuli in spatial tasks, giving rise to the ventriloquism effect. These influences can persist in the absence of visual input following a period of exposure to spatially disparate auditory and visual stimuli, a phenomenon termed the ventriloquism aftereffect. It has been speculated that the visual dominance over audition in spatial tasks is due to the superior spatial acuity of vision compared with audition. If that is the case, then the auditory system should dominate visual perception in a manner analogous to the ventriloquism effect and aftereffect if one uses a task in which the auditory system has superior acuity. To test this prediction, the interactions of visual and auditory stimuli were measured in a temporally based task in normal human subjects. The results show that the auditory system has a pronounced influence on visual temporal rate perception. This influence was independent of the spatial location, spectral bandwidth, and intensity of the auditory stimulus. The influence was, however, strongly dependent on the disparity in temporal rate between the two stimulus modalities. Further, aftereffects were observed following approximately 20 min of exposure to temporally disparate auditory and visual stimuli. These results show that the auditory system can strongly influence visual perception and are consistent with the idea that bimodal sensory conflicts are dominated by the sensory system with the greater acuity for the stimulus parameter being discriminated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12574482     DOI: 10.1152/jn.00706.2002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  72 in total

1.  Cross-modal perceptual load: the impact of modality and individual differences.

Authors:  Rajwant Sandhu; Benjamin James Dyson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-12-15       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Age-related changes in auditory and visual interactions in temporal rate perception.

Authors:  Cassandra J Brooks; Andrew J Anderson; Neil W Roach; Paul V McGraw; Allison M McKendrick
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Hearing what the eyes see: auditory encoding of visual temporal sequences.

Authors:  Sharon E Guttman; Lee A Gilroy; Randolph Blake
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2005-03

Review 4.  The biological basis of audition.

Authors:  Gregg H Recanzone; Mitchell L Sutter
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 24.137

Review 5.  Minding time in an amodal representational space.

Authors:  Virginie van Wassenhove
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-07-12       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  The dog's meow: asymmetrical interaction in cross-modal object recognition.

Authors:  Shlomit Yuval-Greenberg; Leon Y Deouell
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-12-06       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Perceptual learning in auditory temporal discrimination: no evidence for a cross-modal transfer to the visual modality.

Authors:  Einat Lapid; Rolf Ulrich; Thomas Rammsayer
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-04

8.  Static sound timing alters sensitivity to low-level visual motion.

Authors:  Hulusi Kafaligonul; Gene R Stoner
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-10-03       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  Reciprocal Interactions Between Audition and Touch in Flutter Frequency Perception.

Authors:  Silvia Convento; Kira A Wegner-Clemens; Jeffrey M Yau
Journal:  Multisens Res       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 2.286

10.  Sensory dominance in combinations of audio, visual and haptic stimuli.

Authors:  David Hecht; Miriam Reiner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-11-05       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.