Literature DB >> 22420876

Toothbrushing education via a smart software visualization system.

Christian Graetz1, Jule Bielfeldt, Lars Wolff, Claudia Springer, Karim M Fawzy El-Sayed, Sonja Sälzer, Sabah Badri-Höher, Christof E Dörfer.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficiency of a recently developed smart digital toothbrush monitoring and training system (DTS) in terms of correct brushing motion and grip axis orientation in an at-home environment.
METHODS: Twenty-one participants (11 test individuals [DTSG] and 10 control individuals [COG]) received instructions on the modified Bass technique (MBT) after their toothbrushing performance was monitored and they received professional tooth cleaning (T0). After 36 hours (T1), without mechanical oral hygiene measures, plaque and gingival indices were recorded, and the brushing technique was reviewed. After randomization, participants individually performed oral hygiene for 6 weeks (T2) with the provided oral hygiene kits. The DTSG group additionally used DTS. During the following 8 weeks (T3), participants used their original brushing devices without any additional interference. Investigators at each visit were masked regarding group identity. Data were statistically evaluated using Mann-Whitney U, Friedman, Wilcoxon, and paired tests and Pearson correlation.
RESULTS: At T0, 27.27% of DTSG participants used the MBT correctly (COG, 50%), increasing to 54.55% (COG, 60%) after professional instruction (T1) and further to 90.91% at T2 (COG, 60%) (P <0.001). Plaque scores were reduced in DTSG (P <0.05). At T3, 80% of the DTSG (COG, 40%) totally adopted the MBT (P <0.05). The plaque scores on buccal surfaces of the DTSG showed an additional slight improvement between T2 and T3, in contrast to a decline on oral surfaces (P <0.001). At T2 and T3, the DTSG brushed >120 seconds (COG, 90% and 50%) (P <0.05).
CONCLUSION: Apparently, the tested DTS effectively improves the brushing technique and leads to a prolonged learning effect, including improved oral hygiene.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22420876     DOI: 10.1902/jop.2012.110675

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Periodontol        ISSN: 0022-3492            Impact factor:   6.993


  13 in total

1.  Removal of simulated biofilm: a preclinical ergonomic comparison of instruments and operators.

Authors:  Christian Graetz; Anna Plaumann; Sebastian Rauschenbach; Jule Bielfeldt; Christof E Dörfer; Falk Schwendicke
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2015-09-29       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Efficacy of computer-assisted, 3D motion-capture toothbrushing instruction.

Authors:  Kee-Deog Kim; Jin-Sun Jeong; Hae Na Lee; Yu Gu; Kyeong-Seop Kim; Jeong-Whan Lee; Wonse Park
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Bristle splaying and its effect on pre-existing gingival recession-a 12-month randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  C Graetz; A Plaumann; N Heinevetter; S Sälzer; J Bielfeldt; C E Dörfer
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2016-10-31       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Toothbrushing and flossing behaviour in young adults--a video observation.

Authors:  T Winterfeld; N Schlueter; D Harnacke; J Illig; J Margraf-Stiksrud; R Deinzer; C Ganss
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2014-09-04       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  mTeeth: Identifying Brushing Teeth Surfaces Using Wrist-Worn Inertial Sensors.

Authors:  Sayma Akther; Nazir Saleheen; Mithun Saha; Vivek Shetty; Santosh Kumar
Journal:  Proc ACM Interact Mob Wearable Ubiquitous Technol       Date:  2021-06-24

6.  In Defense of Flossing: Part II-Can We Agree It's Premature to Claim Flossing Is Ineffective to Help Prevent Periodontal Diseases?

Authors:  Lance T Vernon; Andre Paes B Da Silva; Jason D Seacat
Journal:  J Evid Based Dent Pract       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 5.267

7.  No difference between manual and different power toothbrushes with and without specific instructions in young, oral healthy adults-results of a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Gerhard Schmalz; Katharina Kiehl; Jan Schmickler; Sven Rinke; Jana Schmidt; Felix Krause; Rainer Haak; Dirk Ziebolz
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2017-09-13       Impact factor: 3.573

8.  Analysis of tooth brushing cycles.

Authors:  Yuki Tosaka; Kuniko Nakakura-Ohshima; Nozomi Murakami; Rikako Ishii; Issei Saitoh; Yoko Iwase; Akihiro Yoshihara; Akitsugu Ohuchi; Haruaki Hayasaki
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2014-01-14       Impact factor: 3.573

9.  Quantitative evaluation of toothbrush and arm-joint motion during tooth brushing.

Authors:  Emi Inada; Issei Saitoh; Yong Yu; Daisuke Tomiyama; Daisuke Murakami; Yoshihiko Takemoto; Ken Morizono; Tomonori Iwasaki; Yoko Iwase; Youichi Yamasaki
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2014-12-04       Impact factor: 3.573

10.  Tooth brushing frequency in Mexican schoolchildren and associated socio-demographic, socioeconomic, and dental variables.

Authors:  Alejandro José Casanova-Rosado; Carlo Eduardo Medina-Solís; Juan Fernando Casanova-Rosado; Ana Alicia Vallejos-Sánchez; Mirna Minaya-Sánchez; Martha Mendoza-Rodríguez; Sonia Márquez-Rodríguez; Gerardo Maupomé
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2014-06-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.