Literature DB >> 22420813

Strong tobacco control program requirements and secure funding are not enough: lessons from Florida.

Allison Kennedy1, Sarah Sullivan, Yogi Hendlin, Richard Barnes, Stanton Glantz.   

Abstract

Florida's Tobacco Pilot Program (TPP; 1998-2003), with its edgy Truth media campaign, achieved unprecedented youth smoking reductions and became a model for tobacco control programming. In 2006, 3 years after the TPP was defunded, public health groups restored funding for tobacco control programming by convincing Florida voters to amend their constitution. Despite the new program's strong legal structure, Governor Charlie Crist's Department of Health implemented a low-impact program. Although they secured the program's strong structure and funding, Florida's nongovernmental public health organizations did not mobilize to demand a high-impact program. Implementation of Florida's Amendment 4 demonstrates that a strong programmatic structure and secure funding are insufficient to ensure a successful public health program, without external pressure from nongovernmental groups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22420813      PMCID: PMC3325324          DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2011.300459

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  47 in total

1.  The Florida "truth" anti-tobacco media evaluation: design, first year results, and implications for planning future state media evaluations.

Authors:  D F Sly; G R Heald; S Ray
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 7.552

2.  Influence of a counteradvertising media campaign on initiation of smoking: the Florida "truth" campaign.

Authors:  D F Sly; R S Hopkins; E Trapido; S Ray
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Getting to the truth: evaluating national tobacco countermarketing campaigns.

Authors:  Matthew C Farrelly; Cheryl G Healton; Kevin C Davis; Peter Messeri; James C Hersey; M Lyndon Haviland
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Tobacco industry documents: treasure trove or quagmire?

Authors:  R E Malone; E D Balbach
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 7.552

5.  Failure to defend a successful state tobacco control program: policy lessons from Florida.

Authors:  M S Givel; S A Glantz
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Priorities among recommended clinical preventive services.

Authors:  A B Coffield; M V Maciosek; J M McGinnis; J R Harris; M B Caldwell; S M Teutsch; D Atkins; J H Richland; A Haddix
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 5.043

7.  Effect of the Arizona tobacco control program on cigarette consumption and healthcare expenditures.

Authors:  James Lightwood; Stanton Glantz
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2010-11-24       Impact factor: 4.634

8.  Association of the California Tobacco Control Program with declines in cigarette consumption and mortality from heart disease.

Authors:  C M Fichtenberg; S A Glantz
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-12-14       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Changes in youth cigarette use and intentions following implementation of a tobacco control program: findings from the Florida Youth Tobacco Survey, 1998-2000.

Authors:  U E Bauer; T M Johnson; R S Hopkins; R G Brooks
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2000-08-09       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Declines in lung cancer rates--California, 1988-1997.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2000-12-01       Impact factor: 17.586

View more
  1 in total

1.  The effect of tobacco control measures during a period of rising cardiovascular disease risk in India: a mathematical model of myocardial infarction and stroke.

Authors:  Sanjay Basu; Stanton Glantz; Asaf Bitton; Christopher Millett
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2013-07-09       Impact factor: 11.069

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.