Literature DB >> 11418251

Priorities among recommended clinical preventive services.

A B Coffield1, M V Maciosek, J M McGinnis, J R Harris, M B Caldwell, S M Teutsch, D Atkins, J H Richland, A Haddix.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Many recommended clinical preventive services are delivered at low rates. Decision-makers who wish to improve delivery rates, but face competing demands for finite resources, need information on the relative value of these services. This article describes the results of a systematic assessment of the value of clinical preventive services recommended for average-risk patients by the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.
METHODS: The assessment of services' value for the U.S. population was based on two dimensions: burden of disease prevented by each service and cost effectiveness. Methods were developed for measuring these criteria consistently across different types of services. A companion article describes the methods in greater detail. Each service received 1 to 5 points on each of the two dimensions, for total scores ranging from 2 to 10. Priority opportunities for improving delivery rates were determined by comparing the ranking of services with what is known of current delivery rates nationally.
RESULTS: The highest ranked services (scores of 7+) with the lowest delivery rates (< or =50% nationally) are providing tobacco cessation counseling to adults, screening older adults for undetected vision impairments, offering adolescents an anti-tobacco message or advice to quit, counseling adolescents on alcohol and drug abstinence, screening adults for colorectal cancer, screening young women for chlamydial infection, screening adults for problem drinking, and vaccinating older adults against pneumococcal disease.
CONCLUSIONS: Decision-makers can use the results to set their own priorities for increasing delivery of clinical preventive services. The methods provide a basis for future priority-setting efforts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11418251     DOI: 10.1016/s0749-3797(01)00308-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Prev Med        ISSN: 0749-3797            Impact factor:   5.043


  72 in total

1.  Primary care: is there enough time for prevention?

Authors:  Kimberly S H Yarnall; Kathryn I Pollak; Truls Østbye; Katrina M Krause; J Lloyd Michener
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  The cost of screening and brief intervention in employee assistance programs.

Authors:  Alexander J Cowell; Jeremy W Bray; Jesse M Hinde
Journal:  J Behav Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.505

3.  The role of quantitative policy analysis in HIV prevention technology transfer.

Authors:  David R Holtgrave
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.792

Review 4.  Promotion of smoking cessation in developing countries: a framework for urgent public health interventions.

Authors:  A S M Abdullah; C G Husten
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 9.139

5.  Barriers to colorectal cancer screening in Latino and Vietnamese Americans. Compared with non-Latino white Americans.

Authors:  Judith M E Walsh; Celia P Kaplan; Bang Nguyen; Ginny Gildengorin; Stephen J McPhee; Eliseo J Pérez-Stable
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  The Italian health surveillance (SiVeAS) prioritization approach to reduce chronic disease risk factors.

Authors:  Eduardo J Simoes; Sergio Mariotti; Alessandra Rossi; Alicia Heim; Felipe Lobello; Ali H Mokdad; Emanuele Scafato
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2012-02-14       Impact factor: 3.380

7.  Colorectal cancer screening. The time is now!

Authors:  Judith Walsh
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Reevaluating the benefits of folic acid fortification in the United States: economic analysis, regulation, and public health.

Authors:  Scott D Grosse; Norman J Waitzman; Patrick S Romano; Joseph Mulinare
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2005-09-29       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 9.  Clarifying efficiency-equity tradeoffs through explicit criteria, with a focus on developing countries.

Authors:  Chris James; Guy Carrin; William Savedoff; Piya Hanvoravongchai
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2005-03

10.  The cost-effectiveness of improving diabetes care in U.S. federally qualified community health centers.

Authors:  Elbert S Huang; Qi Zhang; Sydney E S Brown; Melinda L Drum; David O Meltzer; Marshall H Chin
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.402

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.