Literature DB >> 22418703

Accuracy of quantitative ultrasound elastography for differentiation of malignant and benign breast abnormalities: a meta-analysis.

Gelareh Sadigh1, Ruth C Carlos, Colleen H Neal, Ben A Dwamena.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to systematically review recent literature on diagnostic performance of strain ratio and length ratio, two different strain measurements in ultrasound elastography, for differentiating benign and malignant breast masses. A literature search of PubMed and other medical and general purpose databases from inception through January 2012 was conducted. Published studies that evaluated the diagnostic performance of ultrasound elastography alone reporting either strain ratio or length ratio for characterization of focal breast lesions and using cytology (fine needle aspiration) or histology (core biopsy) as a reference standard were included. Summary diagnostic performance measures were assessed using bivariate generalized linear mixed modeling. Nine studies reported strain ratio for 2,087 breast masses (667 cancers, 1,420 benign lesions). Summary sensitivity and specificity were 88 % (95 % Credible Interval (CrI), 84-91 %), and 83 % (95 % CrI, 78-88 %), respectively. The positive and negative likelihood ratios (LR) were 5.57 (95 % CrI, 3.85-8.01) and 0.14 (95 % CrI, 0.09-0.20), respectively. The inconsistency index for heterogeneity was 6 % (95 % CrI, 1-22 %) for sensitivity and 8 % (95 % CrI, 3-24 %) for specificity. Analysis of three studies reporting length ratio for 450 breast masses demonstrated sensitivity and specificity of 98 % (95 % CrI, 93-99 %) and 72 % (95 % CrI, 31-96 %), respectively. Strain ratio and length ratio have good diagnostic performance for distinguishing benign from malignant breast masses. Although, this performance may not be incrementally superior to that of breast imaging reporting and data system (BIRADS) in B-mode ultrasound, the application of USE using strain ratio or length ratio in combination with USB may have the potential to benefit the patients, and this requires further comparative effectiveness and cost-effectiveness analyses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22418703     DOI: 10.1007/s10549-012-2020-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  41 in total

1.  Combination of two-dimensional shear wave elastography with ultrasound breast imaging reporting and data system in the diagnosis of breast lesions: a new method to increase the diagnostic performance.

Authors:  Dan-Dan Li; Hui-Xiong Xu; Le-Hang Guo; Xiao-Wan Bo; Xiao-Long Li; Rong Wu; Jun-Mei Xu; Yi-Feng Zhang; Kun Zhang
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-12-29       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Auto strain ratio system for the quality control of breast strain elastography.

Authors:  Kazutaka Nakashima; Akiko Mizutou; Sayaka Sakurai
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2017-09-27       Impact factor: 1.314

3.  Optimal Endobronchial Ultrasound Strain Elastography Assessment Strategy: An Explorative Study.

Authors:  Roel L J Verhoeven; Chris L de Korte; Erik H F M van der Heijden
Journal:  Respiration       Date:  2018-12-14       Impact factor: 3.580

4.  Value of Strain Elastography Ultrasound in Differentiation of Breast Masses and Histopathologic Correlation.

Authors:  Aysun Okar Atabey; Erkin Arıbal; Rabia Ergelen; Handan Kaya
Journal:  J Breast Health       Date:  2014-10-01

5.  Diagnosis of sub-centimetre breast lesions: combining BI-RADS-US with strain elastography and contrast-enhanced ultrasound-a preliminary study in China.

Authors:  Xiaoyun Xiao; Qiongchao Jiang; Huan Wu; Xiaofeng Guan; Wei Qin; Baoming Luo
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Three-dimensional shear-wave elastography for differentiating benign and malignant breast lesions: comparison with two-dimensional shear-wave elastography.

Authors:  Ji Hyun Youk; Hye Mi Gweon; Eun Ju Son; Jin Chung; Jeong-Ah Kim; Eun-Kyung Kim
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-12-02       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Diagnostic performances of shear-wave elastography for identification of malignant breast lesions: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Limin Chen; Jun He; Gang Liu; Kezhong Shao; Minda Zhou; Beilei Li; Xiaofei Chen
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2014-09-07       Impact factor: 2.374

Review 8.  JSUM ultrasound elastography practice guidelines: breast.

Authors:  Kazutaka Nakashima; Tsuyoshi Shiina; Masaru Sakurai; Katsutoshi Enokido; Tokiko Endo; Hiroko Tsunoda; Etsuo Takada; Takeshi Umemoto; Ei Ueno
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2013-07-31       Impact factor: 1.314

9.  Modeling Uncertainty of Strain Ratio Measurements in Ultrasound Breast Strain Elastography: A Factorial Experiment.

Authors:  David Rosen; Jingfeng Jiang
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2019-09-23       Impact factor: 2.725

Review 10.  Magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) in cancer: Technique, analysis, and applications.

Authors:  Kay M Pepin; Richard L Ehman; Kiaran P McGee
Journal:  Prog Nucl Magn Reson Spectrosc       Date:  2015-06-23       Impact factor: 9.795

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.