Literature DB >> 22417800

Residual ¹⁸F-FDG-PET uptake 12 weeks after stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for stage I non-small-cell lung cancer predicts local control.

Vikram Rao Bollineni1, Joachim Widder, Jan Pruim, Johannes A Langendijk, Erwin M Wiegman.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the prognostic value of [(18)F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) uptake at 12 weeks after stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) for stage I non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS AND MATERIALS: From November 2006 to February 2010, 132 medically inoperable patients with proven Stage I NSCLC or FDG-PET-positive primary lung tumors were analyzed retrospectively. SABR consisted of 60 Gy delivered in 3 to 8 fractions. Maximum standardized uptake value (SUV(max)) of the treated lesion was assessed 12 weeks after SABR, using FDG-PET. Patients were subsequently followed at regular intervals using computed tomography (CT) scans. Association between post-SABR SUV(max) and local control (LC), mediastinal failure, distant failure, overall survival (OS), and disease-specific survival (DSS) was examined.
RESULTS: Median follow-up time was 17 months (range, 3-40 months). Median lesion size was 25 mm (range, 9-70 mm). There were 6 local failures: 15 mediastinal failures, 15 distant failures, 13 disease-related deaths, and 16 deaths from intercurrent diseases. Glucose corrected post-SABR median SUV(max) was 3.0 (range, 0.55-14.50). Using SUV(max) 5.0 as a cutoff, the 2-year LC was 80% versus 97.7% for high versus low SUV(max), yielding an adjusted subhazard ratio (SHR) for high post-SABR SUV(max) of 7.3 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.4-38.5; p = 0.019). Two-year DSS rates were 74% versus 91%, respectively, for high and low SUV(max) values (SHR, 2.2; 95% CI, 0.8-6.3; p = 0.113). Two-year OS was 62% versus 81% (hazard ratio [HR], 1.6; 95% CI, 0.7-3.7; p = 0.268).
CONCLUSIONS: Residual FDG uptake (SUV(max) ≥5.0) 12 weeks after SABR signifies increased risk of local failure. A single FDG-PET scan at 12 weeks could be used to tailor further follow-up according to the risk of failure, especially in patients potentially eligible for salvage surgery.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22417800     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.01.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  24 in total

Review 1.  New techniques for assessing response after hypofractionated radiotherapy for lung cancer.

Authors:  Sarah A Mattonen; Kitty Huang; Aaron D Ward; Suresh Senan; David A Palma
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  Cone-beam computed tomography in lung stereotactic ablative radiation therapy: predictive parameters of early response.

Authors:  Rosario Mazzola; Alba Fiorentino; Francesco Ricchetti; Niccolò Giaj Levra; Sergio Fersino; Gioacchino Di Paola; Antonio Lo Casto; Ruggero Ruggieri; Filippo Alongi
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 3.  Pulmonary imaging after stereotactic radiotherapy-does RECIST still apply?

Authors:  Sarah A Mattonen; Aaron D Ward; David A Palma
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 4.  The role of texture analysis in imaging as an outcome predictor and potential tool in radiotherapy treatment planning.

Authors:  S Alobaidli; S McQuaid; C South; V Prakash; P Evans; A Nisbet
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-07-23       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Use of 18F-FDG PET/CT to predict short-term outcomes early in the course of chemoradiotherapy in stage III adenocarcinoma of the lung.

Authors:  Xiang-Rong Zhao; Yong Zhang; Yong-Hua Yu
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2018-05-18       Impact factor: 2.967

6.  Early PET-CT After Stereotactic Radiotherapy for Stage 1 Non-small Cell Lung Carcinoma Is Predictive of Local Control.

Authors:  Marguerite Tyran; Nathalie Charrier; Julien Darreon; Anne Madroszyk; Agnes Tallet; Naji Salem
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2018 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.155

Review 7.  Anatomic, functional and molecular imaging in lung cancer precision radiation therapy: treatment response assessment and radiation therapy personalization.

Authors:  Michael MacManus; Sarah Everitt; Tanja Schimek-Jasch; X Allen Li; Ursula Nestle; Feng-Ming Spring Kong
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2017-12

8.  Positron-emission tomography CT to identify local recurrence in stage I lung cancer patients 1 year after stereotactic body radiation therapy.

Authors:  M Essler; J Wantke; B Mayer; K Scheidhauer; R A Bundschuh; B Haller; S T Astner; M Molls; N Andratschke
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2013-04-24       Impact factor: 3.621

9.  Does early posttreatment surveillance imaging affect subsequent management following stereotactic body radiation therapy for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer?

Authors:  Megan E Daly; Laurel A Beckett; Allen M Chen
Journal:  Pract Radiat Oncol       Date:  2013-10-08

Review 10.  Pathologic response after modern radiotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Simon F Roy; Alexander V Louie; Moishe Liberman; Philip Wong; Houda Bahig
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2019-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.