OBJECTIVE: : To analyze lung lesion volume variations by contouring on cone-beam CT (CBCT) images to evaluate the early predictive parameters of stereotactic ablative radiation therapy (SABR) treatment response. METHODS: : The prescribed dose of SABR was varied according to the tumour site (central or peripheral) and maximum diameter of the lesions by using a strategy of risk-adapted dose prescription with a dose range between 48 and 70 Gy in 3-10 consecutive fractions. For the purpose of the analysis, the gross tumour volume (GTV) was recontoured for each patient at first and last CBCT using two lung levels/windows: (a) -600/1000 HU and (b) -1000/250 HU. Univariate analysis was performed to evaluate a correlation between lung lesion variations on CBCT using the two levels/windows and treatment response 6 months after SABR. Independent variables were the number of fractions, time between initial and final fraction, biologically effective dose and pre-SABR GTV. Cut points of lesion volume reduction were evaluated to determine the correlation with complete response 6 months after SABR. RESULTS: : 41 lung lesions were evaluated. 82 lung lesions were recontoured for each CBCT level/window. A lung lesion shrinkage of at least 20% was revealed to be statistically related to complete response 6 months after SABR for both the CBCT levels/windows used. The probability of complete response ranged between six and eight times higher in respect to CBCT levels/windows -600/1000 HU and -1000/250 HU, respectively, compared with patients without a lesion shrinkage of 20% at the last session of SABR. CONCLUSION: : According to current findings, a lung lesion shrinkage of at least 20% at the last session of SABR could be predictable of complete response 6 months thereafter. Further investigations about this topic are needed. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE:: Prediction of the early tumour response could be useful to personalize imaging restaging after the completion of SABR or to incorporate additional therapies in case of poor responders to improve clinical outcomes.
OBJECTIVE: : To analyze lung lesion volume variations by contouring on cone-beam CT (CBCT) images to evaluate the early predictive parameters of stereotactic ablative radiation therapy (SABR) treatment response. METHODS: : The prescribed dose of SABR was varied according to the tumour site (central or peripheral) and maximum diameter of the lesions by using a strategy of risk-adapted dose prescription with a dose range between 48 and 70 Gy in 3-10 consecutive fractions. For the purpose of the analysis, the gross tumour volume (GTV) was recontoured for each patient at first and last CBCT using two lung levels/windows: (a) -600/1000 HU and (b) -1000/250 HU. Univariate analysis was performed to evaluate a correlation between lung lesion variations on CBCT using the two levels/windows and treatment response 6 months after SABR. Independent variables were the number of fractions, time between initial and final fraction, biologically effective dose and pre-SABR GTV. Cut points of lesion volume reduction were evaluated to determine the correlation with complete response 6 months after SABR. RESULTS: : 41 lung lesions were evaluated. 82 lung lesions were recontoured for each CBCT level/window. A lung lesion shrinkage of at least 20% was revealed to be statistically related to complete response 6 months after SABR for both the CBCT levels/windows used. The probability of complete response ranged between six and eight times higher in respect to CBCT levels/windows -600/1000 HU and -1000/250 HU, respectively, compared with patients without a lesion shrinkage of 20% at the last session of SABR. CONCLUSION: : According to current findings, a lung lesion shrinkage of at least 20% at the last session of SABR could be predictable of complete response 6 months thereafter. Further investigations about this topic are needed. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE:: Prediction of the early tumour response could be useful to personalize imaging restaging after the completion of SABR or to incorporate additional therapies in case of poor responders to improve clinical outcomes.
Authors: Robert Timmerman; Rebecca Paulus; James Galvin; Jeffrey Michalski; William Straube; Jeffrey Bradley; Achilles Fakiris; Andrea Bezjak; Gregory Videtic; David Johnstone; Jack Fowler; Elizabeth Gore; Hak Choy Journal: JAMA Date: 2010-03-17 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Joe Y Chang; Suresh Senan; Marinus A Paul; Reza J Mehran; Alexander V Louie; Peter Balter; Harry J M Groen; Stephen E McRae; Joachim Widder; Lei Feng; Ben E E M van den Borne; Mark F Munsell; Coen Hurkmans; Donald A Berry; Erik van Werkhoven; John J Kresl; Anne-Marie Dingemans; Omar Dawood; Cornelis J A Haasbeek; Larry S Carpenter; Katrien De Jaeger; Ritsuko Komaki; Ben J Slotman; Egbert F Smit; Jack A Roth Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2015-05-13 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: A Fiorentino; M Cozzolino; R Caivano; P Pedicini; C Chiumento; C Oliviero; S Clemente; V Fusco Journal: Clin Transl Oncol Date: 2012-10-13 Impact factor: 3.405
Authors: Frank J Lagerwaard; Cornelis J A Haasbeek; Egbert F Smit; Ben J Slotman; S Senan Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2007-12-31 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: F Alongi; L Nicosia; V Figlia; V De Sanctis; R Mazzola; N Giaj-Levra; C Reverberi; M Valeriani; M F Osti Journal: Clin Transl Oncol Date: 2021-04-10 Impact factor: 3.405
Authors: Roman O Kowalchuk; Michael R Waters; K Martin Richardson; Kelly Spencer; James M Larner; William P Irvin; Charles R Kersh Journal: Radiat Oncol Date: 2020-05-13 Impact factor: 3.481