Literature DB >> 22417756

The Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale: translation and antepartum validation for a Hungarian sample.

Annamária Töreki1, Bálint Andó, Attila Keresztúri, János Sikovanyecz, Robert B Dudas, Zoltán Janka, Zoltan Kozinszky, Attila Pál.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) is an important screening instrument routinely used during the peripartum period for the identification of depression. The purpose of the study was to assess the validity of the 10-item EPDS in screening for antepartum depression (APD) in Hungary.
DESIGN: validation study carried out between July and December 2010.
SETTING: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Szeged, Hungary. PARTICIPANTS: 219 women attending a routine check-up at 12 weeks antepartum.
INTERVENTIONS: participants completed the newly translated Hungarian version of the EPDS and underwent a clinical assessment with the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV disorders (SCID-I). MEASUREMENT AND
FINDINGS: seven (3.2%) of the mothers were diagnosed with major antepartum depression and 15 persons (6.85%) with minor depression on the basis of the SCID. Internal consistency of the EPDS was satisfactory (Cronbach α coefficients ≥0.728). The best cut-off on the Hungarian version of the EPDS for major depression was 8/9, with a sensitivity of 71.4%, and a specificity of 91.5%. The area under the ROC curve was found significant for combined depression as well and at a cut-off of 6/7 indicated a sensitivity of 81.8% and a specificity of 83.2%. KEY
CONCLUSIONS: the EPDS showed acceptable validity despite a considerable scatter in the total scores in our sample. IMPLICATION FOR PRACTICE: the EPDS is a reliable instrument for the screening of depressive disorders, especially major depressive disorder in early pregnancy among Hungarian women.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22417756     DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2012.01.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Midwifery        ISSN: 0266-6138            Impact factor:   2.372


  15 in total

1.  Comparative performance of Patient Health Questionnaire-9 and Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale for screening antepartum depression.

Authors:  Qiuyue Zhong; Bizu Gelaye; Marta Rondon; Sixto E Sánchez; Pedro J García; Elena Sánchez; Yasmin V Barrios; Gregory E Simon; David C Henderson; Swee May Cripe; Michelle A Williams
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2014-03-26       Impact factor: 4.839

2.  Associations among attitudes towards motherhood, pet-keeping, and postpartum depression symptoms.

Authors:  Andrea Temesi; Nóra Bunford; Ádám Miklósi
Journal:  Biol Futur       Date:  2020-05-13

3.  Antenatal depressive symptoms associated with specific life events and sources of social support among Italian women.

Authors:  Francesca Agostini; Erica Neri; Paola Salvatori; Sara Dellabartola; Laura Bozicevic; Fiorella Monti
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2015-05

4.  Creating the Capacity to Screen Deaf Women for Perinatal Depression: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Melissa L Anderson; Kelly S Wolf Craig; Sheri Hostovsky; Maureen Bligh; Emily Bramande; Kristin Walker; Kathleen Biebel; Nancy Byatt
Journal:  Midwifery       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 2.372

5.  Stable factor structure of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale during the whole peripartum period: Results from a Japanese prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Chika Kubota; Toshiya Inada; Yukako Nakamura; Tomoko Shiino; Masahiko Ando; Branko Aleksic; Aya Yamauchi; Mako Morikawa; Takashi Okada; Masako Ohara; Maya Sato; Satomi Murase; Setsuko Goto; Atsuko Kanai; Norio Ozaki
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Validation of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale against both DSM-5 and ICD-10 diagnostic criteria for depression.

Authors:  Johanne Smith-Nielsen; Stephen Matthey; Theis Lange; Mette Skovgaard Væver
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2018-12-20       Impact factor: 3.630

7.  Maternal Prenatal Mental Health and Placental 11β-HSD2 Gene Expression: Initial Findings from the Mercy Pregnancy and Emotional Wellbeing Study.

Authors:  Sunaina Seth; Andrew James Lewis; Richard Saffery; Martha Lappas; Megan Galbally
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 5.923

8.  The use of the edinburgh postpartum depression scale in a population of teenager pregnant women in Mexico: a validation study.

Authors:  Cosme Alvarado-Esquivel; Antonio Sifuentes-Alvarez; Carlos Salas-Martinez
Journal:  Clin Pract Epidemiol Ment Health       Date:  2014-11-26

9.  Parental divorce in childhood does not independently predict maternal depressive symptoms during pregnancy.

Authors:  Elviira Porthan; Matti Lindberg; Eeva Ekholm; Noora M Scheinin; Linnea Karlsson; Hasse Karlsson; Juho Härkönen
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2020-09-07       Impact factor: 3.007

10.  Overestimation of Postpartum Depression Prevalence Based on a 5-item Version of the EPDS: Systematic Review and Individual Participant Data Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Brett D Thombs; Brooke Levis; Anita Lyubenova; Dipika Neupane; Zelalem Negeri; Yin Wu; Ying Sun; Chen He; Ankur Krishnan; Simone N Vigod; Parash Mani Bhandari; Mahrukh Imran; Danielle B Rice; Marleine Azar; Matthew J Chiovitti; Nazanin Saadat; Kira E Riehm; Jill T Boruff; Pim Cuijpers; Simon Gilbody; John P A Ioannidis; Lorie A Kloda; Scott B Patten; Ian Shrier; Roy C Ziegelstein; Liane Comeau; Nicholas D Mitchell; Marcello Tonelli; Jacqueline Barnes; Cheryl Tatano Beck; Carola Bindt; Barbara Figueiredo; Nadine Helle; Louise M Howard; Jane Kohlhoff; Zoltán Kozinszky; Angeliki A Leonardou; Sandra Nakić Radoš; Chantal Quispel; Tamsen J Rochat; Alan Stein; Robert C Stewart; Meri Tadinac; S Darius Tandon; Iva Tendais; Annamária Töreki; Thach D Tran; Kylee Trevillion; Katherine Turner; Johann M Vega-Dienstmaier; Andrea Benedetti
Journal:  Can J Psychiatry       Date:  2020-10-26       Impact factor: 4.356

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.