Melissa L Anderson1, Kelly S Wolf Craig2, Sheri Hostovsky2, Maureen Bligh2, Emily Bramande3, Kristin Walker2, Kathleen Biebel4, Nancy Byatt2. 1. Implementation Science & Practice Advances Research Center (iSPARC), Department of Psychiatry, University of Massachusetts Medical School, 222 Maple Avenue, Chang Building, Shrewsbury, MA 01545, USA. Electronic address: melissa.anderson@umassmed.edu. 2. Implementation Science & Practice Advances Research Center (iSPARC), Department of Psychiatry, University of Massachusetts Medical School, 222 Maple Avenue, Chang Building, Shrewsbury, MA 01545, USA. 3. Implementation Science & Practice Advances Research Center (iSPARC), Department of Psychiatry, University of Massachusetts Medical School, 222 Maple Avenue, Chang Building, Shrewsbury, MA 01545, USA; Department of Psychology, Gallaudet University, 800 Florida Avenue, NE, Washington, DC 20002, USA. 4. Implementation Science & Practice Advances Research Center (iSPARC), Department of Psychiatry, University of Massachusetts Medical School, 222 Maple Avenue, Chang Building, Shrewsbury, MA 01545, USA; Massachusetts Rehabilitation Commission, 600 Washington St, Boston, MA 02111, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Compared to hearing women, Deaf female sign language users receive sub-optimal maternal health care and report more dissatisfaction with their prenatal care experiences. As healthcare providers begin to regularly screen for perinatal depression, validated screening tools are not accessible to Deaf women due to severe disparities in English literacy and health literacy. DESIGN AND SETTING: We conducted a one-year, community-engaged pilot study to create an initial American Sign Language (ASL) translation of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS); conduct videophone screening interviews with Deaf perinatal women from across the United States; and perform preliminary statistical analyses of the resulting pilot data. PARTICIPANTS: We enrolled 36 Deaf perinatal women between 5 weeks gestation up to one year postpartum. MEASUREMENTS AND FINDINGS: Results supported the internal consistency of the full ASL EPDS, but did not provide evidence of internal consistency for the anxiety or depression subscales when presented in our ASL format. Participants reported a mean total score of 5.6 out of 30 points on the ASL EPDS (SD = 4.2). Thirty-one percent of participants reported scores in the mild depression range, six percent in the moderate range, and none in the severe range. KEY CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Limitations included small sample size, a restricted range of depression scores, non-normality of our distribution, and lack of a fully-standardized ASL EPDS administration due to our interview approach. Informed by study strengths, limitations, and lessons learned, future efforts will include a larger, more robust psychometric study to inform the development of a Computer-Assisted Self-Interviewing version of the ASL EPDS with automated scoring functions that hearing, non-signing medical providers can use to screen Deaf women for perinatal depression.
OBJECTIVE: Compared to hearing women, Deaf female sign language users receive sub-optimal maternal health care and report more dissatisfaction with their prenatal care experiences. As healthcare providers begin to regularly screen for perinatal depression, validated screening tools are not accessible to Deaf women due to severe disparities in English literacy and health literacy. DESIGN AND SETTING: We conducted a one-year, community-engaged pilot study to create an initial American Sign Language (ASL) translation of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS); conduct videophone screening interviews with Deaf perinatal women from across the United States; and perform preliminary statistical analyses of the resulting pilot data. PARTICIPANTS: We enrolled 36 Deaf perinatal women between 5 weeks gestation up to one year postpartum. MEASUREMENTS AND FINDINGS: Results supported the internal consistency of the full ASL EPDS, but did not provide evidence of internal consistency for the anxiety or depression subscales when presented in our ASL format. Participants reported a mean total score of 5.6 out of 30 points on the ASL EPDS (SD = 4.2). Thirty-one percent of participants reported scores in the mild depression range, six percent in the moderate range, and none in the severe range. KEY CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Limitations included small sample size, a restricted range of depression scores, non-normality of our distribution, and lack of a fully-standardized ASL EPDS administration due to our interview approach. Informed by study strengths, limitations, and lessons learned, future efforts will include a larger, more robust psychometric study to inform the development of a Computer-Assisted Self-Interviewing version of the ASL EPDS with automated scoring functions that hearing, non-signing medical providers can use to screen Deaf women for perinatal depression.
Authors: Annamária Töreki; Bálint Andó; Attila Keresztúri; János Sikovanyecz; Robert B Dudas; Zoltán Janka; Zoltan Kozinszky; Attila Pál Journal: Midwifery Date: 2012-03-13 Impact factor: 2.372
Authors: Annie G Steinberg; Erin A Wiggins; Carlin Henry Barmada; Vicki Joy Sullivan Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Date: 2002-10 Impact factor: 2.681
Authors: Patricia M Dietz; Selvi B Williams; William M Callaghan; Donald J Bachman; Evelyn P Whitlock; Mark C Hornbrook Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2007-10 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Sumitra Devi Shrestha; Rina Pradhan; Thach D Tran; Rosa C Gualano; Jane R W Fisher Journal: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Date: 2016-04-04 Impact factor: 3.007