Literature DB >> 33104415

Overestimation of Postpartum Depression Prevalence Based on a 5-item Version of the EPDS: Systematic Review and Individual Participant Data Meta-analysis.

Brett D Thombs1,2,3,4,5,6,7, Brooke Levis1,2,8, Anita Lyubenova1, Dipika Neupane1,2, Zelalem Negeri1,2, Yin Wu1,2,4, Ying Sun1, Chen He1,2, Ankur Krishnan1, Simone N Vigod9, Parash Mani Bhandari1,2, Mahrukh Imran1, Danielle B Rice1,3, Marleine Azar1,2, Matthew J Chiovitti1, Nazanin Saadat1, Kira E Riehm1,10, Jill T Boruff11, Pim Cuijpers12, Simon Gilbody13, John P A Ioannidis14, Lorie A Kloda15, Scott B Patten16,17,18, Ian Shrier1,2,19, Roy C Ziegelstein20, Liane Comeau21, Nicholas D Mitchell22,23, Marcello Tonelli24, Jacqueline Barnes25, Cheryl Tatano Beck26, Carola Bindt27, Barbara Figueiredo28, Nadine Helle27, Louise M Howard29,30, Jane Kohlhoff31,32,33, Zoltán Kozinszky34, Angeliki A Leonardou35, Sandra Nakić Radoš36, Chantal Quispel37, Tamsen J Rochat38,39, Alan Stein40,41, Robert C Stewart42,43, Meri Tadinac44, S Darius Tandon45, Iva Tendais28, Annamária Töreki46, Thach D Tran47, Kylee Trevillion29, Katherine Turner48, Johann M Vega-Dienstmaier49, Andrea Benedetti2,5,50.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The Maternal Mental Health in Canada, 2018/2019, survey reported that 18% of 7,085 mothers who recently gave birth reported "feelings consistent with postpartum depression" based on scores ≥7 on a 5-item version of the Edinburgh Postpartum Depression Scale (EPDS-5). The EPDS-5 was designed as a screening questionnaire, not to classify disorders or estimate prevalence; the extent to which EPDS-5 results reflect depression prevalence is unknown. We investigated EPDS-5 ≥7 performance relative to major depression prevalence based on a validated diagnostic interview, the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM (SCID).
METHODS: We searched Medline, Medline In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations, PsycINFO, and the Web of Science Core Collection through June 2016 for studies with data sets with item response data to calculate EPDS-5 scores and that used the SCID to ascertain depression status. We conducted an individual participant data meta-analysis to estimate pooled percentage of EPDS-5 ≥7, pooled SCID major depression prevalence, and the pooled difference in prevalence.
RESULTS: A total of 3,958 participants from 19 primary studies were included. Pooled prevalence of SCID major depression was 9.2% (95% confidence interval [CI] 6.0% to 13.7%), pooled percentage of participants with EPDS-5 ≥7 was 16.2% (95% CI 10.7% to 23.8%), and pooled difference was 8.0% (95% CI 2.9% to 13.2%). In the 19 included studies, mean and median ratios of EPDS-5 to SCID prevalence were 2.1 and 1.4 times.
CONCLUSIONS: Prevalence estimated based on EPDS-5 ≥7 appears to be substantially higher than the prevalence of major depression. Validated diagnostic interviews should be used to establish prevalence.

Entities:  

Keywords:  epidemiology; evidence-based medicine; obstetrics and gynecology; psychiatry; statistics and research methods

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33104415      PMCID: PMC7658422          DOI: 10.1177/0706743720934959

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Psychiatry        ISSN: 0706-7437            Impact factor:   4.356


  34 in total

Review 1.  Postpartum Depression.

Authors:  Donna E Stewart; Simone Vigod
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  A comparison of three screening tools to identify perinatal depression among low-income African American women.

Authors:  S Darius Tandon; Fallon Cluxton-Keller; Julie Leis; Huynh-Nhu Le; Deborah F Perry
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2011-08-23       Impact factor: 4.839

3.  Postpartum depression screening by telephone: a good alternative for public health and research.

Authors:  Felipe Pinheiro de Figueiredo; Ana Paula Parada; Viviane Cunha Cardoso; Rosângela Fernandes Lucena Batista; Antônio Augusto Moura da Silva; Marco Antônio Barbieri; Ricardo de Carvalho Cavalli; Heloisa Bettiol; Cristina Marta Del-Ben
Journal:  Arch Womens Ment Health       Date:  2014-11-09       Impact factor: 3.633

4.  Comparative analysis of the performance of the Postpartum Depression Screening Scale with two other depression instruments.

Authors:  C T Beck; R K Gable
Journal:  Nurs Res       Date:  2001 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.381

5.  The Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale: translation and antepartum validation for a Hungarian sample.

Authors:  Annamária Töreki; Bálint Andó; Attila Keresztúri; János Sikovanyecz; Robert B Dudas; Zoltán Janka; Zoltan Kozinszky; Attila Pál
Journal:  Midwifery       Date:  2012-03-13       Impact factor: 2.372

6.  Validation of the subscales of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale in a sample of women with unsettled infants.

Authors:  Jane Phillips; Margaret Charles; Louise Sharpe; Stephen Matthey
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2009-03-10       Impact factor: 4.839

7.  Successful five-item triage for the broad spectrum of mental disorders in pregnancy - a validation study.

Authors:  Chantal Quispel; Tom A J Schneider; Witte J G Hoogendijk; Gouke J Bonsel; Mijke P Lambregtse-van den Berg
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2015-02-28       Impact factor: 3.007

8.  Diagnostic accuracy of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) for detecting major depression in pregnant and postnatal women: protocol for a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analyses.

Authors:  Brett D Thombs; Andrea Benedetti; Lorie A Kloda; Brooke Levis; Kira E Riehm; Marleine Azar; Pim Cuijpers; Simon Gilbody; John P A Ioannidis; Dean McMillan; Scott B Patten; Ian Shrier; Russell J Steele; Roy C Ziegelstein; Marcello Tonelli; Nicholas Mitchell; Liane Comeau; Joy Schinazi; Simone Vigod
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Postpartum GAD is a risk factor for postpartum MDD: the course and longitudinal relationships of postpartum GAD and MDD.

Authors:  Jason Prenoveau; Michelle Craske; Nicholas Counsell; Valerie West; Beverley Davies; Peter Cooper; Elizabeth Rapa; Alan Stein
Journal:  Depress Anxiety       Date:  2013-01-03       Impact factor: 6.505

10.  Comparison of major depression diagnostic classification probability using the SCID, CIDI, and MINI diagnostic interviews among women in pregnancy or postpartum: An individual participant data meta-analysis.

Authors:  Brooke Levis; Dean McMillan; Ying Sun; Chen He; Danielle B Rice; Ankur Krishnan; Yin Wu; Marleine Azar; Tatiana A Sanchez; Matthew J Chiovitti; Parash Mani Bhandari; Dipika Neupane; Nazanin Saadat; Kira E Riehm; Mahrukh Imran; Jill T Boruff; Pim Cuijpers; Simon Gilbody; John P A Ioannidis; Lorie A Kloda; Scott B Patten; Ian Shrier; Roy C Ziegelstein; Liane Comeau; Nicholas D Mitchell; Marcello Tonelli; Simone N Vigod; Franca Aceti; Rubén Alvarado; Cosme Alvarado-Esquivel; Muideen O Bakare; Jacqueline Barnes; Cheryl Tatano Beck; Carola Bindt; Philip M Boyce; Adomas Bunevicius; Tiago Castro E Couto; Linda H Chaudron; Humberto Correa; Felipe Pinheiro de Figueiredo; Valsamma Eapen; Michelle Fernandes; Barbara Figueiredo; Jane R W Fisher; Lluïsa Garcia-Esteve; Lisa Giardinelli; Nadine Helle; Louise M Howard; Dina Sami Khalifa; Jane Kohlhoff; Laima Kusminskas; Zoltán Kozinszky; Lorenzo Lelli; Angeliki A Leonardou; Beth A Lewis; Michael Maes; Valentina Meuti; Sandra Nakić Radoš; Purificación Navarro García; Daisuke Nishi; Daniel Okitundu Luwa E-Andjafono; Emma Robertson-Blackmore; Tamsen J Rochat; Heather J Rowe; Bonnie W M Siu; Alkistis Skalkidou; Alan Stein; Robert C Stewart; Kuan-Pin Su; Inger Sundström-Poromaa; Meri Tadinac; S Darius Tandon; Iva Tendais; Pavaani Thiagayson; Annamária Töreki; Anna Torres-Giménez; Thach D Tran; Kylee Trevillion; Katherine Turner; Johann M Vega-Dienstmaier; Karen Wynter; Kimberly A Yonkers; Andrea Benedetti; Brett D Thombs
Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res       Date:  2019-09-30       Impact factor: 4.035

View more
  2 in total

1.  Gestational anemia and maternal antenatal and postpartum psychological distress in a prospective FinnBrain Birth Cohort Study.

Authors:  Kaarin Mäkikallio; Linnea Karlsson; Lotta Kemppinen; Mirjami Mattila; Eeva Ekholm; Linda Huolila; Juho Pelto; Hasse Karlsson
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2022-09-13       Impact factor: 3.105

2.  Scalable Screening and Treatment Response Monitoring for Perinatal Depression in Low- and Middle-Income Countries.

Authors:  Ahmed Waqas; Abid Malik; Najia Atif; Anum Nisar; Huma Nazir; Siham Sikander; Atif Rahman
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-06-22       Impact factor: 3.390

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.