Literature DB >> 22417619

Freeform fabricated scaffolds with roughened struts that enhance both stem cell proliferation and differentiation by controlling cell shape.

Girish Kumar1, Michael S Waters, Tanya M Farooque, Marian F Young, Carl G Simon.   

Abstract

We demonstrate that freeform fabricated (FFF) scaffolds with a roughened surface topography can support hBMSC proliferation, while also inducing osteogenic differentiation, for maximized generation of calcified, bone-like tissue. Previously, hBMSCs rapidly proliferated, without osteogenic differentiation, during culture in FFF scaffolds. In contrast, hBMSCs underwent osteogenic differentiation, with slow proliferation, during culture in nanofiber scaffolds. Analysis of cell morphology showed that the topography presented by the nanofiber scaffolds drove hBMSC differentiation by guiding them into a morphology that induced osteogenic differentiation. Herein, we hypothesized that using the high-surface area architecture of FFF scaffolds to present a surface roughness that drives hBMSCs into a morphology that induces osteogenic differentiation would yield a maximum amount differentiated hBMSCs and bone-like tissue. Thus, a solvent etching method was developed that imparted a 5-fold increase in roughness to the surface of the struts of poly(ε-caprolactone) (PCL) FFF scaffolds. The etched scaffolds induced osteogenic differentiation of the hBMSCs while un-etched scaffolds did not. The etched scaffolds also supported the same high levels of hBMSC proliferation that un-etched scaffolds supported. Finally, hBMSCs on un-etched scaffolds had a large spread area, while hBMSCs on etched scaffolds has a smaller area and were more rounded, indicating that the surface roughness from the etched scaffolds dictated the morphology of the hBMSCs. The results demonstrate that FFF scaffolds with surface roughness can support hBMSC proliferation, while also inducing osteogenic differentiation, to maximize generation of calcified tissue. This work validates a rational approach to scaffold fabrication where the structure of the scaffold was designed to optimize stem cell function by controlling cell morphology. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22417619      PMCID: PMC3428138          DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.02.048

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomaterials        ISSN: 0142-9612            Impact factor:   12.479


  30 in total

1.  Nano-fibrous scaffolding architecture selectively enhances protein adsorption contributing to cell attachment.

Authors:  Kyung Mi Woo; Victor J Chen; Peter X Ma
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2003-11-01       Impact factor: 4.396

2.  3D microtomographic characterization of precision extruded poly-epsilon-caprolactone scaffolds.

Authors:  A L Darling; W Sun
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2004-08-15       Impact factor: 3.368

3.  Cell shape, cytoskeletal tension, and RhoA regulate stem cell lineage commitment.

Authors:  Rowena McBeath; Dana M Pirone; Celeste M Nelson; Kiran Bhadriraju; Christopher S Chen
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 12.270

Review 4.  Exploring and engineering the cell surface interface.

Authors:  Molly M Stevens; Julian H George
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-11-18       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Bone regeneration on computer-designed nano-fibrous scaffolds.

Authors:  Victor J Chen; Laura A Smith; Peter X Ma
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2006-03-27       Impact factor: 12.479

6.  Geometric control of cell life and death.

Authors:  C S Chen; M Mrksich; S Huang; G M Whitesides; D E Ingber
Journal:  Science       Date:  1997-05-30       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Cell shape controls terminal differentiation of human epidermal keratinocytes.

Authors:  F M Watt; P W Jordan; C H O'Neill
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Bone response to 3D periodic hydroxyapatite scaffolds with and without tailored microporosity to deliver bone morphogenetic protein 2.

Authors:  Jennifer G Dellinger; Jo Ann C Eurell; Matthew Stewart; Russell D Jamison
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 4.396

9.  Role of cell shape in growth control.

Authors:  J Folkman; A Moscona
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1978-06-01       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Cytoskeletal organization of human mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) changes during their osteogenic differentiation.

Authors:  J Pablo Rodríguez; Mauricio González; Susana Ríos; Verónica Cambiazo
Journal:  J Cell Biochem       Date:  2004-11-01       Impact factor: 4.429

View more
  22 in total

1.  A surface-modified poly(ɛ-caprolactone) scaffold comprising variable nanosized surface-roughness using a plasma treatment.

Authors:  HoJun Jeon; Hyeongjin Lee; GeunHyung Kim
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part C Methods       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 3.056

2.  3D powder printed tetracalcium phosphate scaffold with phytic acid binder: fabrication, microstructure and in situ X-Ray tomography analysis of compressive failure.

Authors:  Sourav Mandal; Susanne Meininger; Uwe Gbureck; Bikramjit Basu
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2018-03-08       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 3.  Calcium Orthophosphate-Based Bioceramics.

Authors:  Sergey V Dorozhkin
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2013-09-06       Impact factor: 3.623

4.  Role of α2β1 integrins in mediating cell shape on microtextured titanium surfaces.

Authors:  Min Lai; Christopher D Hermann; Alice Cheng; Rene Olivares-Navarrete; Rolando A Gittens; Meredith M Bird; Marcus Walker; Ye Cai; Kaiyong Cai; Kenneth H Sandhage; Zvi Schwartz; Barbara D Boyan
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 4.396

5.  Multiscale porosity in mesoporous bioglass 3D-printed scaffolds for bone regeneration.

Authors:  M Natividad Gómez-Cerezo; Juan Peña; Sašo Ivanovski; Daniel Arcos; María Vallet-Regí; Cedryck Vaquette
Journal:  Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl       Date:  2020-11-06       Impact factor: 7.328

6.  Fabrication of Submicro-Nano Structures on Polyetheretherketone Surface by Femtosecond Laser for Exciting Cellular Responses of MC3T3-E1 Cells/Gingival Epithelial Cells.

Authors:  Dong Xie; Chenhui Xu; Cheng Ye; Shiqi Mei; Longqing Wang; Qi Zhu; Qing Chen; Qi Zhao; Zhiyan Xu; Jie Wei; Lili Yang
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2021-05-10

7.  Towards an in vitro model mimicking the foreign body response: tailoring the surface properties of biomaterials to modulate extracellular matrix.

Authors:  Febriyani F R Damanik; Tonia C Rothuizen; Clemens van Blitterswijk; Joris I Rotmans; Lorenzo Moroni
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2014-09-19       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Modeling, validation and verification of three-dimensional cell-scaffold contacts from terabyte-sized images.

Authors:  Peter Bajcsy; Soweon Yoon; Stephen J Florczyk; Nathan A Hotaling; Mylene Simon; Piotr M Szczypinski; Nicholas J Schaub; Carl G Simon; Mary Brady; Ram D Sriram
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Biomodification of PCL Scaffolds with Matrigel, HA, and SR1 Enhances De Novo Ectopic Bone Marrow Formation Induced by rhBMP-2.

Authors:  Wenjing Bao; Mei Gao; Yanyan Cheng; Hyun Jae Lee; Qinghao Zhang; Susan Hemingway; Zhibo Luo; Andrzej Krol; Guanlin Yang; Jing An
Journal:  Biores Open Access       Date:  2015-06-01

10.  Polycaprolactone-coated 3D printed tricalcium phosphate scaffolds for bone tissue engineering: in vitro alendronate release behavior and local delivery effect on in vivo osteogenesis.

Authors:  Solaiman Tarafder; Susmita Bose
Journal:  ACS Appl Mater Interfaces       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 9.229

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.