Literature DB >> 29520670

3D powder printed tetracalcium phosphate scaffold with phytic acid binder: fabrication, microstructure and in situ X-Ray tomography analysis of compressive failure.

Sourav Mandal1, Susanne Meininger2, Uwe Gbureck3, Bikramjit Basu4,5.   

Abstract

One of the important aspects in 3D powder printing (3DPP) is the selection of binder for a specific material composition to produce scaffolds with desired microstructure and physico-chemical properties. To this end, a new powder-binder combination, namely tetracalcium phosphate (TTCP) and phytic acid (IP6) was investigated at ambient temperature, for low load bearing application. A minimal deviation (<200 µm, w.r.t. computer aided design) was observed in the final sample through optimization of 3DPP process, along with minimum strut and macro-pore size of 200 and 750 µm, respectively. Importantly, the printed scaffolds exhibited compressive strength of 4-8.5 MPa (in the range of cancellous bone) and in vitro dissolution experiments in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) upto one month revealed gradual degradation in strength property. The TTCP scaffolds are characterized to be moderately porous (~40%) with high interconnectivity, which is essential for vascularization and good osteoconductivity. Another major aim of this study was to demonstrate the failure mechanism of 3D powder-printed scaffolds using monotonic and intermittent compression coupled with micro-computed tomography (µCT) imaging. Analyzing these results, we have demonstrated the origin of crack generation and propagation under compressive loading in relation to the unique microstructure, obtained through 3DPP. These findings enable us to acquire a deeper insight of the relationship between structural attributes and failure behavior, to further tailor the 3D powder printing process for ceramic biomaterials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29520670     DOI: 10.1007/s10856-018-6034-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med        ISSN: 0957-4530            Impact factor:   3.896


  40 in total

Review 1.  Advancing the field of 3D biomaterial printing.

Authors:  Adam E Jakus; Alexandra L Rutz; Ramille N Shah
Journal:  Biomed Mater       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 3.715

2.  3D-printed silicate porous bioceramics using a non-sacrificial preceramic polymer binder.

Authors:  A Zocca; H Elsayed; E Bernardo; C M Gomes; M A Lopez-Heredia; C Knabe; P Colombo; J Günster
Journal:  Biofabrication       Date:  2015-05-22       Impact factor: 9.954

3.  Printability of calcium phosphate powders for three-dimensional printing of tissue engineering scaffolds.

Authors:  Andre Butscher; Marc Bohner; Christian Roth; Annika Ernstberger; Roman Heuberger; Nicola Doebelin; Philipp Rudolf von Rohr; Ralph Müller
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2011-09-06       Impact factor: 8.947

Review 4.  Tetracalcium phosphate: Synthesis, properties and biomedical applications.

Authors:  C Moseke; U Gbureck
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2010-05-21       Impact factor: 8.947

5.  Synthesis and characterization of porous beta-tricalcium phosphate blocks.

Authors:  M Bohner; G H van Lenthe; S Grünenfelder; W Hirsiger; R Evison; R Müller
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 12.479

6.  Surface roughness modulates the local production of growth factors and cytokines by osteoblast-like MG-63 cells.

Authors:  K Kieswetter; Z Schwartz; T W Hummert; D L Cochran; J Simpson; D D Dean; B D Boyan
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1996-09

7.  Highly porous polymer-derived wollastonite-hydroxycarbonate apatite ceramics for bone regeneration.

Authors:  L Fiocco; S Li; E Bernardo; M M Stevens; J R Jones
Journal:  Biomed Mater       Date:  2016-04-12       Impact factor: 3.715

8.  Bioresorption behavior of tetracalcium phosphate-derived calcium phosphate cement implanted in femur of rabbits.

Authors:  Chih-Hung Tsai; Ruey-Mo Lin; Chien-Ping Ju; Jiin-Huey Chern Lin
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 12.479

9.  Micro-CT studies on 3-D bioactive glass-ceramic scaffolds for bone regeneration.

Authors:  Chiara Renghini; Vladimir Komlev; Fabrizio Fiori; Enrica Verné; Francesco Baino; Chiara Vitale-Brovarone
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2008-11-07       Impact factor: 8.947

Review 10.  A review on powder-based additive manufacturing for tissue engineering: selective laser sintering and inkjet 3D printing.

Authors:  Seyed Farid Seyed Shirazi; Samira Gharehkhani; Mehdi Mehrali; Hooman Yarmand; Hendrik Simon Cornelis Metselaar; Nahrizul Adib Kadri; Noor Azuan Abu Osman
Journal:  Sci Technol Adv Mater       Date:  2015-05-05       Impact factor: 8.090

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  3D Printing of Bioceramic Scaffolds-Barriers to the Clinical Translation: From Promise to Reality, and Future Perspectives.

Authors:  Kang Lin; Rakib Sheikh; Sara Romanazzo; Iman Roohani
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2019-08-21       Impact factor: 3.623

2.  Effects of surface area and topography on 3D printed tricalcium phosphate scaffolds for bone grafting applications.

Authors:  Ashley A Vu; Destany A Burke; Amit Bandyopadhyay; Susmita Bose
Journal:  Addit Manuf       Date:  2021-01-26

Review 3.  Additive Manufacturing for Guided Bone Regeneration: A Perspective for Alveolar Ridge Augmentation.

Authors:  Patrick Rider; Željka Perić Kačarević; Said Alkildani; Sujith Retnasingh; Reinhard Schnettler; Mike Barbeck
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 5.923

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.