BACKGROUND: Relative myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) is the standard imaging approach for the diagnosis and prognostic work-up of coronary artery disease (CAD). However, this technique may underestimate the extent of disease in patients with 3-vessel CAD. Positron emission tomography (PET) is also able to quantify myocardial blood flow. Rubidium-82 ((82)Rb) is a valid PET tracer alternative in centers that lack a cyclotron. The aim of this study was to assess whether assessment of myocardial flow reserve (MFR) measured with (82)Rb PET is an independent predictor of severe obstructive 3-vessel CAD. METHODS: We enrolled a cohort of 120 consecutive patients referred to a dipyridamole (82)Rb PET MPI for evaluation of ischemia neither with prior coronary artery bypass graft nor with recent percutaneous coronary intervention that also underwent coronary angiogram within 6 months of the PET study. Patients with and without 3-vessel CAD were compared. RESULTS: Among patients with severe 3-vessel CAD, MFR was globally reduced (<2) in 88% (22/25). On the adjusted logistic Cox model, MFR was an independent predictor of 3-vessel CAD [.5 unit decrease, HR: 2.1, 95% CI (1.2-3.8); P = .015]. The incremental value of (82)Rb MFR over the SSS was also shown by comparing the adjusted SSS models with and without (82)Rb MFR (P = .005). CONCLUSION: (82)Rb MFR is an independent predictor of 3-vessel CAD and provided added value to relative MPI. Clinical integration of this approach should be considered to enhance detection and risk assessment of patients with known or suspected CAD.
BACKGROUND: Relative myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) is the standard imaging approach for the diagnosis and prognostic work-up of coronary artery disease (CAD). However, this technique may underestimate the extent of disease in patients with 3-vessel CAD. Positron emission tomography (PET) is also able to quantify myocardial blood flow. Rubidium-82 ((82)Rb) is a valid PET tracer alternative in centers that lack a cyclotron. The aim of this study was to assess whether assessment of myocardial flow reserve (MFR) measured with (82)Rb PET is an independent predictor of severe obstructive 3-vessel CAD. METHODS: We enrolled a cohort of 120 consecutive patients referred to a dipyridamole (82)Rb PET MPI for evaluation of ischemia neither with prior coronary artery bypass graft nor with recent percutaneous coronary intervention that also underwent coronary angiogram within 6 months of the PET study. Patients with and without 3-vessel CAD were compared. RESULTS: Among patients with severe 3-vessel CAD, MFR was globally reduced (<2) in 88% (22/25). On the adjusted logistic Cox model, MFR was an independent predictor of 3-vessel CAD [.5 unit decrease, HR: 2.1, 95% CI (1.2-3.8); P = .015]. The incremental value of (82)Rb MFR over the SSS was also shown by comparing the adjusted SSS models with and without (82)Rb MFR (P = .005). CONCLUSION: (82)Rb MFR is an independent predictor of 3-vessel CAD and provided added value to relative MPI. Clinical integration of this approach should be considered to enhance detection and risk assessment of patients with known or suspected CAD.
Authors: Manuel D Cerqueira; Neil J Weissman; Vasken Dilsizian; Alice K Jacobs; Sanjiv Kaul; Warren K Laskey; Dudley J Pennell; John A Rumberger; Thomas Ryan; Mario S Verani Journal: Circulation Date: 2002-01-29 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Hongcheng Shi; Cesar A Santana; Abel Rivero; Rupan Sanyal; Fabio P Esteves; Liudmila Verdes; Mario Ornelas; Russell D Folks; Stamatios Lerakis; Raghuveer K Halkar; Ernest V Garcia Journal: Nucl Med Commun Date: 2007-11 Impact factor: 1.690
Authors: Riikka Lautamäki; Richard T George; Kakuya Kitagawa; Takahiro Higuchi; Jennifer Merrill; Corina Voicu; Anthony DiPaula; Stephan G Nekolla; João A C Lima; Albert C Lardo; Frank M Bengel Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2008-11-05 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Bernhard A Herzog; Lars Husmann; Ines Valenta; Oliver Gaemperli; Patrick T Siegrist; Fabian M Tay; Nina Burkhard; Christophe A Wyss; Philipp A Kaufmann Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2009-07-07 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Mireille Lortie; Rob S B Beanlands; Keiichiro Yoshinaga; Ran Klein; Jean N Dasilva; Robert A DeKemp Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2007-07-07 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Maria Sciammarella; Uttam M Shrestha; Youngho Seo; Grant T Gullberg; Elias H Botvinick Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2017-08-03 Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: Ankur Gupta; Viviany R Taqueti; Tim P van de Hoef; Navkaranbir S Bajaj; Paco E Bravo; Venkatesh L Murthy; Michael T Osborne; Sara B Seidelmann; Tomas Vita; Courtney F Bibbo; Meagan Harrington; Jon Hainer; Ornella Rimoldi; Sharmila Dorbala; Deepak L Bhatt; Ron Blankstein; Paolo G Camici; Marcelo F Di Carli Journal: Circulation Date: 2017-09-01 Impact factor: 29.690