Literature DB >> 22415819

Does quantification of myocardial flow reserve using rubidium-82 positron emission tomography facilitate detection of multivessel coronary artery disease?

Maria C Ziadi1, Robert A Dekemp, Kathryn Williams, Ann Guo, Jennifer M Renaud, Benjamin J W Chow, Ran Klein, Terrence D Ruddy, May Aung, Linda Garrard, Rob S B Beanlands.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Relative myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) is the standard imaging approach for the diagnosis and prognostic work-up of coronary artery disease (CAD). However, this technique may underestimate the extent of disease in patients with 3-vessel CAD. Positron emission tomography (PET) is also able to quantify myocardial blood flow. Rubidium-82 ((82)Rb) is a valid PET tracer alternative in centers that lack a cyclotron. The aim of this study was to assess whether assessment of myocardial flow reserve (MFR) measured with (82)Rb PET is an independent predictor of severe obstructive 3-vessel CAD.
METHODS: We enrolled a cohort of 120 consecutive patients referred to a dipyridamole (82)Rb PET MPI for evaluation of ischemia neither with prior coronary artery bypass graft nor with recent percutaneous coronary intervention that also underwent coronary angiogram within 6 months of the PET study. Patients with and without 3-vessel CAD were compared.
RESULTS: Among patients with severe 3-vessel CAD, MFR was globally reduced (<2) in 88% (22/25). On the adjusted logistic Cox model, MFR was an independent predictor of 3-vessel CAD [.5 unit decrease, HR: 2.1, 95% CI (1.2-3.8); P = .015]. The incremental value of (82)Rb MFR over the SSS was also shown by comparing the adjusted SSS models with and without (82)Rb MFR (P = .005).
CONCLUSION: (82)Rb MFR is an independent predictor of 3-vessel CAD and provided added value to relative MPI. Clinical integration of this approach should be considered to enhance detection and risk assessment of patients with known or suspected CAD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22415819     DOI: 10.1007/s12350-011-9506-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol        ISSN: 1071-3581            Impact factor:   5.952


  31 in total

Review 1.  Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart. A statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Manuel D Cerqueira; Neil J Weissman; Vasken Dilsizian; Alice K Jacobs; Sanjiv Kaul; Warren K Laskey; Dudley J Pennell; John A Rumberger; Thomas Ryan; Mario S Verani
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2002-01-29       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Normal values and prospective validation of transient ischaemic dilation index in 82Rb PET myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Hongcheng Shi; Cesar A Santana; Abel Rivero; Rupan Sanyal; Fabio P Esteves; Liudmila Verdes; Mario Ornelas; Russell D Folks; Stamatios Lerakis; Raghuveer K Halkar; Ernest V Garcia
Journal:  Nucl Med Commun       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 1.690

3.  Automated determination of the left ventricular long axis in cardiac positron tomography.

Authors:  R A deKemp; C Nahmias
Journal:  Physiol Meas       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 2.833

4.  Absolute quantitation of coronary steal induced by intravenous dipyridamole.

Authors:  O O Akinboboye; O Idris; R L Chou; R R Sciacca; P J Cannon; S R Bergmann
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  Incremental prognostic value of gated Rb-82 positron emission tomography myocardial perfusion imaging over clinical variables and rest LVEF.

Authors:  Sharmila Dorbala; Rory Hachamovitch; Zelmira Curillova; Deepak Thomas; Divya Vangala; Raymond Y Kwong; Marcelo F Di Carli
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2009-07

6.  Positron emission tomographic measurements of absolute regional myocardial blood flow permits identification of nonviable myocardium in patients with chronic myocardial infarction.

Authors:  H Gewirtz; A J Fischman; S Abraham; M Gilson; H W Strauss; N M Alpert
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1994-03-15       Impact factor: 24.094

7.  Rubidium-82 PET-CT for quantitative assessment of myocardial blood flow: validation in a canine model of coronary artery stenosis.

Authors:  Riikka Lautamäki; Richard T George; Kakuya Kitagawa; Takahiro Higuchi; Jennifer Merrill; Corina Voicu; Anthony DiPaula; Stephan G Nekolla; João A C Lima; Albert C Lardo; Frank M Bengel
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2008-11-05       Impact factor: 9.236

8.  Long-term prognostic value of 13N-ammonia myocardial perfusion positron emission tomography added value of coronary flow reserve.

Authors:  Bernhard A Herzog; Lars Husmann; Ines Valenta; Oliver Gaemperli; Patrick T Siegrist; Fabian M Tay; Nina Burkhard; Christophe A Wyss; Philipp A Kaufmann
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2009-07-07       Impact factor: 24.094

9.  Quantification of myocardial blood flow with 82Rb dynamic PET imaging.

Authors:  Mireille Lortie; Rob S B Beanlands; Keiichiro Yoshinaga; Ran Klein; Jean N Dasilva; Robert A DeKemp
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2007-07-07       Impact factor: 9.236

10.  Underestimation of coronary artery disease with SPECT perfusion imaging.

Authors:  George A Beller
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2008 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.872

View more
  94 in total

1.  A combined static-dynamic single-dose imaging protocol to compare quantitative dynamic SPECT with static conventional SPECT.

Authors:  Maria Sciammarella; Uttam M Shrestha; Youngho Seo; Grant T Gullberg; Elias H Botvinick
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  Advances in clinical application of quantitative myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Juhani Knuuti; Antti Saraste
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 3.  PET: Is myocardial flow quantification a clinical reality?

Authors:  Antti Saraste; Sami Kajander; Chunlei Han; Sergey V Nesterov; Juhani Knuuti
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 4.  Reasons and implications of agreements and disagreements between coronary flow reserve, fractional flow reserve, and myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Manish Motwani; Mahsaw Motlagh; Anuj Gupta; Daniel S Berman; Piotr J Slomka
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-12-29       Impact factor: 5.952

5.  Myocardial blood flow: Putting it into clinical perspective.

Authors:  Thomas Hellmut Schindler
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 5.952

6.  Cardiovascular risk assessment with regadenoson SPECT MPI in patients with end-stage renal disease is safe, effective, and well tolerated: Does it matter?

Authors:  Erica O Miller; Ronald G Schwartz
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 7.  Quantitative myocardial blood flow with Rubidium-82 PET: a clinical perspective.

Authors:  Christoffer E Hagemann; Adam A Ghotbi; Andreas Kjær; Philip Hasbak
Journal:  Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2015-10-12

Review 8.  Clinical use of quantitative cardiac perfusion PET: rationale, modalities and possible indications. Position paper of the Cardiovascular Committee of the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM).

Authors:  Roberto Sciagrà; Alessandro Passeri; Jan Bucerius; Hein J Verberne; Riemer H J A Slart; Oliver Lindner; Alessia Gimelli; Fabien Hyafil; Denis Agostini; Christopher Übleis; Marcus Hacker
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 9.  Advances in stress cardiac MRI and computed tomography.

Authors:  Yasmin S Hamirani; Christopher M Kramer
Journal:  Future Cardiol       Date:  2013-09

10.  Integrated Noninvasive Physiological Assessment of Coronary Circulatory Function and Impact on Cardiovascular Mortality in Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease.

Authors:  Ankur Gupta; Viviany R Taqueti; Tim P van de Hoef; Navkaranbir S Bajaj; Paco E Bravo; Venkatesh L Murthy; Michael T Osborne; Sara B Seidelmann; Tomas Vita; Courtney F Bibbo; Meagan Harrington; Jon Hainer; Ornella Rimoldi; Sharmila Dorbala; Deepak L Bhatt; Ron Blankstein; Paolo G Camici; Marcelo F Di Carli
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 29.690

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.