Literature DB >> 22415351

Chromosome fragility in river buffalo cows exposed to dioxins.

V Genualdo1, A Perucatti, A Iannuzzi, G P Di Meo, S M Spagnuolo, A Caputi-Jambrenghi, A Coletta, G Vonghia, L Iannuzzi.   

Abstract

Fifty river buffalo (Bubalus bubalis, 2n = 50) cows reared in two different provinces of Campania (southern Italy) underwent cytogenetic investigations to ascertain possible differences in their chromosome stability. One group (Caserta province) was under legal sequestration due to the presence in the milk mass of higher mean values of dioxins [21.79 pg/g of fat as sum of polychloro-dibenzo-dioxins (PCDDs), polychloro-dibenzo-furans (PCDFs) and dioxin-like polychlorobiphenyls (DL-PCBs)] than both those permitted (6.0 pg/g of fat as WHO-TEQ) and those (1.3 pg/g of fat as WHO-TEQ) observed in the control group raised in Salerno province. Two types of peripheral blood cell cultures were performed: without (normal cultures for the chromosome abnormality (CA) test: chromatid breaks, chromosome breaks, fragments) and with the addition of BrdU for the sister chromatid exchange (SCE) test). The CA test revealed a significantly (P < 0.01) higher chromosome fragility in the exposed cows compared to the control. Indeed, mean values of CA/cell were 1.26 ± 1.15 in exposed cows and 0.37 ± 0.71 in the control. Mean SCE was higher in exposed cows (8.50 ± 3.35) than that (8.29 ± 3.51) found in the control but the difference was not significant. Comparison within the same group of cows at first (FL) and multiple (ML) lactations revealed significantly (P < 0.01) higher mean values of CA/cell in exposed ML-cows vs FL-cows while no statistical differences were found between ML-cows and FL-cows in the control farm. By contrast, significantly (P < 0.01) higher mean values of SCE were found in both groups of FL-cows versus ML-cows. Comparisons with other previous studied species (sheep and cattle) were also performed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22415351     DOI: 10.1007/s13353-012-0092-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Genet        ISSN: 1234-1983            Impact factor:   3.240


  12 in total

Review 1.  Progress towards understanding the nature of chromatid breakage.

Authors:  P E Bryant; L J Gray; N Peresse
Journal:  Cytogenet Genome Res       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.636

2.  Increased frequencies of both chromosome abnormalities and SCEs in two sheep flocks exposed to high dioxin levels during pasturage.

Authors:  A Perucatti; G P Di Meo; S Albarella; F Ciotola; D Incarnato; A Caputi Jambrenghi; V Peretti; G Vonghia; L Iannuzzi
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  2006-01-24       Impact factor: 3.000

Review 3.  Dioxin: a review of its environmental effects and its aryl hydrocarbon receptor biology.

Authors:  Prabir K Mandal
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2005-04-08       Impact factor: 2.200

4.  Fluorescence in situ hybridization mapping of six loci containing genes involved in the dioxin metabolism of domestic bovids.

Authors:  Viviana Genualdo; Veronica Spalenza; Angela Perucatti; Alessandra Iannuzzi; Giulia Pia Di Meo; Annamaria Caputi-Jambrenghi; Gino Vonghia; Roberto Rasero; Carlo Nebbia; Paola Sacchi; Leopoldo Iannuzzi
Journal:  J Appl Genet       Date:  2011-04-05       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Chromosome fragility in dairy cows exposed to dioxins and dioxin-like PCBs.

Authors:  G P Di Meo; A Perucatti; V Genualdo; A Caputi-Jambrenghi; R Rasero; C Nebbia; L Iannuzzi
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 3.000

Review 6.  Ah receptor: dioxin-mediated toxic responses as hints to deregulated physiologic functions.

Authors:  Karl Walter Bock; Christoph Köhle
Journal:  Biochem Pharmacol       Date:  2006-03-20       Impact factor: 5.858

Review 7.  The aryl hydrocarbon receptor complex and the control of gene expression.

Authors:  Timothy V Beischlag; J Luis Morales; Brett D Hollingshead; Gary H Perdew
Journal:  Crit Rev Eukaryot Gene Expr       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.807

8.  Determinants of TCDD half-life in veterans of operation ranch hand.

Authors:  W H Wolfe; J E Michalek; J C Miner; J L Pirkle; S P Caudill; D G Patterson; L L Needham
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health       Date:  1994-04

9.  Age and accumulation of persistent organochlorines: a study of Arctic-breeding glaucous gulls (Larus hyperboreus).

Authors:  Jan Ove Bustnes; Vidar Bakken; Janneche Utne Skaare; Kjell Einar Erikstad
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.742

Review 10.  Dioxin revisited: developments since the 1997 IARC classification of dioxin as a human carcinogen.

Authors:  Kyle Steenland; Pier Bertazzi; Andrea Baccarelli; Manolis Kogevinas
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Heavy Environmental Pressure in Campania and Other Italian Regions: A Short Review of Available Evidence.

Authors:  Alfredo Mazza; Prisco Piscitelli; Andrea Falco; Maria Lucia Santoro; Manuela Colangelo; Giovanni Imbriani; Adele Idolo; Antonella De Donno; Leopoldo Iannuzzi; Annamaria Colao
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 3.390

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.