Literature DB >> 22415001

Comparison of 3-dimensional spinal reconstruction accuracy: biplanar radiographs with EOS versus computed tomography.

Diana A Glaser1, Josh Doan, Peter O Newton.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Experimental study for systematic evaluation of 3-dimensional (3D) reconstructions from low-dose digital stereoradiography.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the accuracy of EOS (EOS Imaging, Paris, France) 3-dimensional (3D) reconstructions compared with 3D computed tomography (CT) and the effect spine positioning within the EOS unit has on reconstruction accuracy. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Scoliosis is a 3D deformity, but 3D morphological analyses are still rare. A new low-dose radiation digital stereoradiography system (EOS) was previously evaluated for intra/interobserver variability, but data are limited for 3D reconstruction accuracy.
METHODS: Three synthetic scoliotic phantoms (T1-pelvis) were scanned in upright position at 0°, ±5°, and ±10° of axial rotation within EOS and in supine position using CT. Three-dimensional EOS reconstructions were superimposed on corresponding 3D computed tomographic reconstructions. Shape, position, and orientation accuracy were assessed for each vertebra and the entire spine. Additional routine planer clinical deformity measurements were compared: Cobb angle, kyphosis, lordosis, and pelvic incidence.
RESULTS: Mean EOS vertebral body shape accuracy was 1.1 ± 0.2 mm (maximum 4.7 mm), with 95% confidence interval of 1.7 mm. Different anatomical vertebral regions were modeled well with root-mean-square (RMS) values from 1.2 to 1.6 mm. Position and orientation accuracy of each vertebra were high: RMS offset was 1.2 mm (maximum 3.7 mm) and RMS axial rotation was 1.9° (maximum 5.8°). There was no significant difference in each of the analyzed parameters (P > 0.05) associated with varying the rotational position of the phantoms in EOS machine. Planer measurements accuracy was less than 1° mean difference for pelvic incidence, Cobb angle (mean 1.6°/maximum 3.9°), and sagittal kyphosis (mean less than 1°, maximum 4.9°).
CONCLUSION: The EOS image acquisition and reconstruction software provides accurate 3D spinal representations of scoliotic spinal deformities. The results of this study provide spinal deformity surgeons evidence pertaining to this new upright 3D imaging technology that may aid in the clinical diagnosis and decision making for patients with scoliosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22415001     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182518a15

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  42 in total

1.  Three dimensional analysis of brace biomechanical efficacy for patients with AIS.

Authors:  David E Lebel; Zaid Al-Aubaidi; Eyun-Jung Shin; Andrew Howard; Reinhard Zeller
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-07-20       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Assessment of the axial rotation of the pelvis with the EOS® imaging system: intra- and inter-observer reproducibility and accuracy study.

Authors:  Marc-Antoine Rousseau; Adrien Brusson; Jean-Yves Lazennec
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2013-08-13

3.  EOS suspension test for the assessment of spinal flexibility in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Caroline Hirsch; Brice Ilharreborde; Keyvan Mazda
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Will a low-dose biplanar radiograph become "gold standard" for three-dimensional assessment of spinal deformity in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis?

Authors:  Yu Yamato; Yukihiro Matsuyama
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-06

5.  Relative position of sacral base in the pelvis and its correlation with spino-pelvic parameters.

Authors:  Masashi Okamoto; Kazuhiro Hasegawa; Shun Hatsushikano; Kei Watanabe; Haruka Shimoda; Koichi Kobayashi; Makoto Sakamoto
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-08-23       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Bi-planar spinal stereoradiography of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: considerations in 3D alignment and functional balance.

Authors:  Saba Pasha; Anthony Capraro; Patrick J Cahill; John P Dormans; John M Flynn
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-06-22       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Patient-specific 3D models created by 3D imaging system or bi-planar imaging coupled with Moiré-Fringe projections: a comparative study of accuracy and reliability on spinal curvatures and vertebral rotation data.

Authors:  Arnaud Hocquelet; François Cornelis; Anna Jirot; Laurent Castaings; Mathieu de Sèze; Olivier Hauger
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  A three-dimensional analysis of scoliosis progression in non-idiopathic scoliosis: is it similar to adolescent idiopathic scoliosis?

Authors:  Keith R Bachmann; Burt Yaszay; Carrie E Bartley; Tracey P Bastrom; Fredrick G Reighard; Vidyadhar V Upasani; Peter O Newton
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2019-06-10       Impact factor: 1.475

9.  Sagittal balance measures are more reproducible when measured in 3D vs in 2D using full-body EOS® images.

Authors:  Masashi Okamoto; Fouad Jabour; Kenichiro Sakai; Shun Hatsushikano; J C Le Huec; Kazuhiro Hasegawa
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-05-07       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  The use of a photogrammetric method for the three-dimensional evaluation of spinal correction in scoliosis.

Authors:  Eric Berthonnaud; Patrice Papin; Julie Deceuninck; Radwan Hilmi; Jean Claude Bernard; Joannes Dimnet
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-01-04       Impact factor: 3.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.