Literature DB >> 2241316

Intrarectal ultrasonography in rectal cancer staging and in the evaluation of pelvic disease. Clinical uses of intrarectal ultrasound.

J W Milsom1, H Graffner.   

Abstract

Accurate preoperative staging of a rectal cancer patient may impact heavily on subsequent management. This study attempts to evaluate the accuracy of intrarectal ultrasonography (IRUS) in staging rectal cancers compared to clinical and pathologic examination. In addition the accuracy of IRUS was assessed in a group of patients with uncertain pelvic-perirectal disease after a negative physical examination. In a prospective manner, 52 cancer patients were staged with digital exam and IRUS. Accuracy rates were 48% and 83%, respectively, compared to pathologic evaluation in assessing wall penetration, and IRUS identified positive lymph nodes in 12 of 17 cases. In patients with pelvic disease, IRUS corresponded with pathologic diagnosis in 15 of 17 cases and revealed new information in 6 patients. Intrarectal ultrasonography appears to be the most accurate imaging technique for staging rectal cancers and demonstrates promise in the evaluation of perirectal-pelvic disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2241316      PMCID: PMC1358188          DOI: 10.1097/00000658-199011000-00007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  25 in total

1.  The prognostic significance of direct extension of carcinoma of the colon and rectum.

Authors:  V B ASTLER; F A COLLER
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1954-06       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  President's address. Rectal cancer: the spectrum of selective surgery.

Authors:  A Y Mason
Journal:  Proc R Soc Med       Date:  1976-04

3.  Preoperative assessment of the extension of rectal carcinoma: correlation of MR, surgical, and histopathologic findings.

Authors:  C Guinet; J N Buy; A Sezeur; H Mosnier; M Ghossain; M Malafosse; M Guivarc'h; D Vadrot; J Ecoiffier
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1988 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.826

4.  Preoperative staging of rectal carcinoma by computed tomography and 0.15T magnetic resonance imaging. Preliminary report.

Authors:  C G Hodgman; R L MacCarty; B G Wolff; G R May; T H Berquist; P F Sheedy; R W Beart; R J Spencer
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 4.585

5.  Transrectal ultrasonotomography of the prostate.

Authors:  H Watanabe; D Igari; Y Tanahashi; K Harada; M Saitoh
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1975-11       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Endoluminal ultrasound in the assessment of local invasion in rectal cancer.

Authors:  J Beynon; D M Foy; A M Roe; L N Temple; N J Mortensen
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 6.939

7.  Endosonographic staging of rectal carcinoma.

Authors:  G Di Candio; F Mosca; A Campatelli; A Cei; M Ferrari; F Basolo
Journal:  Gastrointest Radiol       Date:  1987

8.  Detection and staging of primary rectal and rectosigmoid cancer by computed tomography.

Authors:  R F Thoeni; A A Moss; P Schnyder; A R Margulis
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1981-10       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Endorectal ultrasound: instrumentation and clinical aspects.

Authors:  U Hildebrandt; G Feifel; H P Schwarz; O Scherr
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  Staging rectal cancer by MR and CT.

Authors:  R J Butch; D D Stark; J Wittenberg; J E Tepper; S Saini; J F Simeone; P R Mueller; J T Ferrucci
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 3.959

View more
  11 in total

1.  The prognosis of rectal carcinoid tumours.

Authors:  B Teleky; F Herbst; F Längle; N Neuhold; B Niederle
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 2.  Electrocoagulation for adenocarcinoma of the low rectum.

Authors:  T E Eisenstat; G C Oliver
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1992 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Technique of per anal excision for carcinoma of the low rectum.

Authors:  S Nivatvongs; B G Wolff
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1992 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Endoscopic ultrasound-guided transrectal biopsies of pelvic tumors.

Authors:  Marco Sailer; Dieter Bussen; Martin Fein; Stephan Freys; Sebastian E Debus; Arnulf Thiede; Karl-Hermann Fuchs
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2002 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Preoperative adjuvant radiation with chemotherapy for rectal cancer: its impact on stage of disease and the role of endorectal ultrasound.

Authors:  A Bernini; K I Deen; R D Madoff; W D Wong
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 5.344

6.  Colonoscopic indirect lymphangiography in a canine model.

Authors:  D Sudan; S Miller; J Mellinger
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1993 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 7.  The value of endosonographic rectal carcinoma staging in routine diagnostics: a 10-year analysis.

Authors:  W K H Kauer; L Prantl; H J Dittler; J R Siewert
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-05-27       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Endoscopic ultrasound-guided transrectal aspiration of pelvic fluid collections.

Authors:  M Sailer; D Bussen; K-H Fuchs; A Thiede
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-04-06       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Improved accuracy of computed tomography in local staging of rectal cancer using water enema.

Authors:  L Lupo; G Angelelli; O Pannarale; D Altomare; L Macarini; V Memeo
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 10.  Rectal cancer: how accurate can imaging predict the T stage and the circumferential resection margin?

Authors:  R G H Beets-Tan; G L Beets
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2003-03-07       Impact factor: 2.571

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.