Literature DB >> 12904995

Rectal cancer: how accurate can imaging predict the T stage and the circumferential resection margin?

R G H Beets-Tan1, G L Beets.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: One of the concerns after rectal cancer surgery is the local recurrence rate. Randomized trials have shown that the best local control rate for rectal cancer patients overall is obtained by a short preoperative course of radiotherapy followed by a total mesorectal excision, but there are however subgroups of rectal cancer patients with varying risks of recurrences. DISCUSSION: At one end of the continuum are patients with stage I disease who are at very low risk of local recurrence. At the other end are the patients with locally advanced tumor who are at very high risk, and who would benefit from a more extensive neoadjuvant treatment schedule. This kind of differentiated treatment can be performed only when there is an accurate tool to identify preoperatively the different risk groups. There is recent evidence, suggesting that MRI can serve for this purpose, because it accurately predicts the tumor free circumferential resection margin at TME.
CONCLUSION: This article provides a literature review of the value of preoperative imaging in rectal cancer surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12904995     DOI: 10.1007/s00384-003-0480-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 0179-1958            Impact factor:   2.571


  67 in total

1.  The value of endorectal ultrasound in the assessment of adenomas, T1- and T2-carcinomas.

Authors:  M Sailer; R Leppert; M Kraemer; K H Fuchs; A Thiede
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Endorectal ultrasonography for the assessment of wall invasion and lymph node metastasis in rectal cancer.

Authors:  Y Katsura; K Yamada; T Ishizawa; H Yoshinaka; H Shimazu
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 4.585

3.  Assessment of rectal tumor infiltration utilizing endorectal MR imaging and comparison with endoscopic rectal sonography.

Authors:  R J Zagoria; C A Schlarb; D J Ott; R I Bechtold; N T Wolfman; E S Scharling; M Y Chen; B W Loggie
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 3.454

4.  Effects of endorectal ultrasonography in the surgical management of rectal adenomas and carcinomas.

Authors:  P Lee; K Oyama; L Homer; E Sullivan
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 2.565

5.  Rectal cancer: CT local staging with histopathologic correlation.

Authors:  M Chiesura-Corona; P C Muzzio; G Giust; M Zuliani; S Pucciarelli; P Toppan
Journal:  Abdom Imaging       Date:  2001 Mar-Apr

6.  Endorectal ultrasonography and treatment of early stage rectal cancer.

Authors:  T Akasu; H Kondo; Y Moriya; K Sugihara; T Gotoda; S Fujita; T Muto; T Kakizoe
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Computed tomography in carcinoma of the rectum.

Authors:  W Zaunbauer; M Haertel; W A Fuchs
Journal:  Gastrointest Radiol       Date:  1981-01-15

8.  Staging rectal cancer by MR and CT.

Authors:  R J Butch; D D Stark; J Wittenberg; J E Tepper; S Saini; J F Simeone; P R Mueller; J T Ferrucci
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  Endoscopic ultrasound and endorectal magnetic resonance imaging: a prospective, comparative study for preoperative staging and follow-up of rectal cancer.

Authors:  C Meyenberger; R A Huch Böni; P Bertschinger; G F Zala; H P Klotz; G P Krestin
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 10.093

10.  Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography in the preoperative staging of rectal cancer.

Authors:  C Guinet; J N Buy; M A Ghossain; A Sézeur; A Mallet; J M Bigot; D Vadrot; J Ecoiffier
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1990-03
View more
  12 in total

1.  Preoperative evaluation of the depth of anal canal invasion in very low rectal cancer by magnetic resonance imaging and surgical indications for intersphincteric resection.

Authors:  Yoshiko Bamba; Michio Itabashi; Shingo Kameoka
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 2.549

2.  Is there a benefit in using magnetic resonance imaging in the prediction of preoperative neoadjuvant therapy response in locally advanced rectal cancer?

Authors:  Lian-Ming Wu; Jiong Zhu; Jiani Hu; Yan Yin; Hai-Yan Gu; Jia Hua; Jie Chen; Jian-Rong Xu
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Comparison of CT, MRI and FDG-PET in response prediction of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer after multimodal preoperative therapy: is there a benefit in using functional imaging?

Authors:  T Denecke; B Rau; K-T Hoffmann; B Hildebrandt; J Ruf; M Gutberlet; M Hünerbein; R Felix; P Wust; H Amthauer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-04-02       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Net survival of patients with colorectal cancer: a comparison of two periods.

Authors:  Zdravko Štor; Rok Blagus; Alessandro Tropea; Antonio Biondi
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2019-06-12

5.  [PET/CT for colorectal and hepatic tumors].

Authors:  J Stollfuss; H Wieder; E Rummeny; M Schwaiger
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 0.635

6.  Dynamic graciloplasty for total anorectal reconstruction after abdominoperineal resection for rectal tumour.

Authors:  K S Ho; F Seow-Choen
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2004-08-04       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  [Imaging modalities in the preoperative staging of rectal carcinoma].

Authors:  P Hohenberger; M Hünerbein; B Gebauer; Ch Stroszczynski
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 0.955

8.  Optimizing adjuvant treatment decisions for stage t2 rectal cancer based on mesorectal node size: a decision analysis.

Authors:  Rebecca I Hartman; Connie Y Chang; Jennifer Y Wo; Jonathan D Eisenberg; Theodore S Hong; Mukesh G Harisinghani; G Scott Gazelle; Pari V Pandharipande
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2012-09-02       Impact factor: 3.173

9.  Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in rectal cancer: a comprehensive review.

Authors:  Michael R Torkzad; Lars Påhlman; Bengt Glimelius
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2010-08-15

10.  The importance of rectal cancer MRI protocols on interpretation accuracy.

Authors:  Chikako Suzuki; Michael R Torkzad; Soichi Tanaka; Gabriella Palmer; Johan Lindholm; Torbjörn Holm; Lennart Blomqvist
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2008-08-20       Impact factor: 2.754

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.