PURPOSE: Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is the leading cause of blindness in the elderly. Evidence suggests oxidative stress plays a role in the disease. To assess the potential contribution of epigenetic regulation of antioxidant genes relevant to AMD pathogenesis, we evaluated DNA methylation, a tissue-specific genetic modulation that affects gene expression. METHODS: Using the Infinium HumanMethylation27 Illumina platform, we performed DNA bisulfite sequencing to compare the methylation status in postmortem retina pigment epithelium (RPE)/choroid between patients with AMD and age-matched controls. Gene expression was assessed with the Affymetrix Exon Array. TaqMan gene expression assays were used for relative quantification (RT-PCR) confirmation of the expression array results: Glutathione S-transferase isoform mu1 (GSTM1) and mu5 (GSTM5) promoter methylation was confirmed by CpG island bisulfite pyrosequencing. To assess protein levels and localization, we used Western analysis, immunohistochemistry, and immunofluorescence with murine and human samples. RESULTS: The mRNA levels of GSTM1 and GSTM5 were significantly reduced in AMD versus age-matched controls in RPE/choroid and neurosensory retina (NSR), which corresponded to hypermethylation of the GSTM1 promoter. mRNA and protein levels were decreased (RPE to a greater extent than NSR) in AMD postmortem samples, irrespective of age. Immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescence confirm the presence of the enzymes in the NSR and RPE. CONCLUSIONS: Comparison of DNA methylation, together with mRNA levels, revealed significant differences between AMD versus normal retinas. The evidence presented suggests that GSTM1 and GSTM5 undergo epigenetic repression in AMD RPE/choroid, which may increase susceptibility to oxidative stress in AMD retinas.
PURPOSE: Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is the leading cause of blindness in the elderly. Evidence suggests oxidative stress plays a role in the disease. To assess the potential contribution of epigenetic regulation of antioxidant genes relevant to AMD pathogenesis, we evaluated DNA methylation, a tissue-specific genetic modulation that affects gene expression. METHODS: Using the Infinium HumanMethylation27 Illumina platform, we performed DNA bisulfite sequencing to compare the methylation status in postmortem retina pigment epithelium (RPE)/choroid between patients with AMD and age-matched controls. Gene expression was assessed with the Affymetrix Exon Array. TaqMan gene expression assays were used for relative quantification (RT-PCR) confirmation of the expression array results: Glutathione S-transferase isoform mu1 (GSTM1) and mu5 (GSTM5) promoter methylation was confirmed by CpG island bisulfite pyrosequencing. To assess protein levels and localization, we used Western analysis, immunohistochemistry, and immunofluorescence with murine and human samples. RESULTS: The mRNA levels of GSTM1 and GSTM5 were significantly reduced in AMD versus age-matched controls in RPE/choroid and neurosensory retina (NSR), which corresponded to hypermethylation of the GSTM1 promoter. mRNA and protein levels were decreased (RPE to a greater extent than NSR) in AMD postmortem samples, irrespective of age. Immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescence confirm the presence of the enzymes in the NSR and RPE. CONCLUSIONS: Comparison of DNA methylation, together with mRNA levels, revealed significant differences between AMD versus normal retinas. The evidence presented suggests that GSTM1 and GSTM5 undergo epigenetic repression in AMD RPE/choroid, which may increase susceptibility to oxidative stress in AMD retinas.
Authors: Majda Hadziahmetovic; Ying Song; Padmavathi Ponnuru; Jared Iacovelli; Allan Hunter; Nadine Haddad; John Beard; James R Connor; Sophie Vaulont; Joshua L Dunaief Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2011-01-05 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Courtney Prochnow; Ronda Bransteitter; Michael G Klein; Myron F Goodman; Xiaojiang S Chen Journal: Nature Date: 2006-12-24 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Ximena Corso-Díaz; James Gentry; Ryan Rebernick; Catherine Jaeger; Matthew J Brooks; Freekje van Asten; Keshav Kooragayala; Linn Gieser; Jacob Nellissery; Raul Covian; Tiziana Cogliati; Anupam K Mondal; Ke Jiang; Anand Swaroop Journal: Cell Rep Date: 2020-04-21 Impact factor: 9.423
Authors: Allan A Hunter; Zeljka Smit-McBride; Rachel Anderson; Matthew H Bordbari; Gui-shuang Ying; Esther S Kim; Susanna S Park; David G Telander; Joshua L Dunaief; Leonard M Hjelmeland; Lawrence S Morse Journal: Curr Eye Res Date: 2015-04-21 Impact factor: 2.424
Authors: Verity F Oliver; Andrew E Jaffe; Jin Song; Guohua Wang; Pingwu Zhang; Kari E Branham; Anand Swaroop; Charles G Eberhart; Donald J Zack; Jiang Qian; Shannath L Merbs Journal: Epigenetics Date: 2015 Impact factor: 4.528