| Literature DB >> 22408418 |
Abstract
Obesity is a global health problem. It is also known to be a risk factor for the development of metabolic disorders, type 2 diabetes, systemic hypertension, cardiovascular disease, dyslipidemia, and atherosclerosis. In this study, we screened crude extracts from 400 plants to test their anti-obesity activity using porcine pancreatic lipase assay (PPL; triacylglycerol lipase, EC 3.1.1.3) in vitro activity. Among the 400 plants species examined, 44 extracts from plants, showed high anti-lipase activity using 2,4-dinitrophenylbutyrate as a substrate in porcine pancreatic lipase assay. Furthermore, 44 plant extracts were investigated for their inhibition of lipid accumulation in 3T3-L1 cells. Among these 44 extracts examined, crude extracts from 4 natural plant species were active. Salicis Radicis Cortex had the highest fat inhibitory activity, whereas Rubi Fructus, Corni Fructus, and Geranium nepalense exhibited fat inhibitory capacity higher than 30% at 100 μg/mL in 3T3-L1 adipocytes, suggesting anti-obesity activity. These results suggest that four potent plant extracts might be of therapeutic interest with respect to the treatment of obesity.Entities:
Keywords: anti-obesity; lipid inhibition; plant extracts; screening
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22408418 PMCID: PMC3291987 DOI: 10.3390/ijms13021710
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 6.208
Forty four plant extracts that inhibit porcine pancreatic lipase (PPL).
| No. | Latin Name | Scientific Name | Family Name | Plant Part | Inhibition (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Campanulaceae | Root | 3.5 ± 0.7 | ||
| 2 | Ranunculaceae | Root | 12.1 ± 1.1 | ||
| 3 | Moraceae | Seed | 7.7 ± 0.2 | ||
| 4 | Rosaceae | Fruit | 7.1 ± 0.7 | ||
| 5 | Actinidiaceae | Fruit | 3.2 ± 0.2 | ||
| 6 | Zygophyllaceae | Seed | 2.5 ± 0.6 | ||
| 7 | Liliaceae | Stem | 6.5 ± 1.2 | ||
| 8 | Cucurbitaceae | Fruit | 8.2 ± 1.4 | ||
| 9 | Rosaceae | Fruit | 5.5 ± 1.2 | ||
| 10 | Leguminosae | Root | 3.2 ± 0.1 | ||
| 11 | Valerianaceae | Rhizoma | 6.4 ± 0.5 | ||
| 12 | Rhamnaceae | Fruit | 6.6 ± 1.5 | ||
| 13 | Lardizabalaceae | Stem | 11.5 ± 0.1 | ||
| 14 | Combretaceae | Fruit | 11.8 ± 0.3 | ||
| 15 | Loranthaceae | Whole grass | 13.5 ± 0.7 | ||
| 16 | Schizandraceae | Fruit | 5.8 ± 0.2 | ||
| 17 | Caprifoliaceae | Stem | 6.4 ± 0.5 | ||
| 18 | Scrophulariaceae | Root | 6.8 ± 1.1 | ||
| 19 | Dipsacaceae | Root | 12.5 ± 0.3 | ||
| 20 | Rubiaceae | Root | 3.9 ± 0.7 | ||
| 21 | Labiatae | Seed | 8.4 ± 0.3 | ||
| 22 | Rosaceae | Seed | 7.7 ± 0.6 | ||
| 23 | Meliaceae | Fruit | 8.6 ± 0.8 | ||
| 24 | Orchidaceae | Rhizoma | 12.1 ± 0.4 | ||
| 25 | Rubiaceae | Whole grass | 1.80 ± 0.4 | ||
| 26 | Polyporaceae | Bark | 12.7 ± 0.5 | ||
| 27 | Orochidaceae | Rhizoma | 8.4 ± 0.8 | ||
| 28 | Sympetalae | Root | 7.5 ± 1.1 | ||
| 29 | Convolvulaceae | Seed | 5.8 ± 0.4 | ||
| 30 | Araliaceae | Stem | 6.6 ± 0.7 | ||
| 31 | Liliaceae | Stem | 8.7 ± 0.5 | ||
| 32 | Valerianaceae | Root | 7.7 ± 1.4 | ||
| 33 | Labiatae | Root | 8.7 ± 0.4 | ||
| 34 | Leguminosae | Root | 7.4 ± 1.4 | ||
| 35 | Rutaceae | Bark | 11.5 ± 0.2 | ||
| 36 | Polypodiaceae | Rhizoma | 10.5 ± 0.4 | ||
| 37 | Rosaceae | Fruit | 32.5 ± 1.1 | ||
| 38 | Rosaceae | Leaf | 9.8 ± 0.3 | ||
| 39 | Cornaceae | Fruit | 34.8 ± 2.3 | ||
| 40 | Oleaceae | Fruit | 5.7 ± 1.2 | ||
| 41 | Ulmaceae | Bark | 38.0 ± 1.9 | ||
| 42 | Zingiberaceae | Fruit | 7.5 ± 0.6 | ||
| 43 | Polygonaceae | Whole grass | 21.2 ± 1.7 | ||
| 44 | Geraniaceae | Whole grass | 31.4 ± 0.7 | ||
| 45 | Orlistat | 42.0 ± 2.5 |
The inhibition of lipase activity by crude natural extracts was compared to the one observed with the positive control (Orlistat). Data are presented as average ± standard deviation (n = 3) and the anti-lipase activity was investigated at a concentration of 100 μg/mL for PPL inhibition.
Figure 1Porcine pancreatic lipase (PPL) inhibitory activities of Rubi Fructus, Corni Fructus, Salicis Radicis Cortex, Geranium nepalense. Orlistat was used as a positive control. Experiments have been performed in triplicate.
Figure 2Effects of plant extracts on Oil Red O staining in cultured 3T3-L1 adipocytes. (A) Effects of plant extracts on fat droplet formation in 3T3-L1 cells. It was stained with Oil Red O dye and examined using a light microscope; (B) Relative lipid content by quantification method of Oil Red O staining. Data are presented as average ± SD (n = 3). * indicates p < 0.05.
Figure 3Effects of plant extracts on adipocyte differentiation in 3T3-L1 cells. (A) Triglyceride (TG) accumulation was measured by TG contents of 3T3-L1 cells differentiated in the presence of natural extracts; (B) Lipolysis was assessed by the measurement of glycerol released into the medium. Data are presented as average ± SD (n = 3). * indicates p < 0.05.