Literature DB >> 22405676

The RECOVER I: a multicenter prospective study of Impella 5.0/LD for postcardiotomy circulatory support.

Bartley P Griffith1, Mark B Anderson, Louis E Samuels, Walter E Pae, Yoshifumi Naka, O Howard Frazier.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Cardiogenic shock after cardiac surgery is accompanied by a high mortality rate. Early institution of hemodynamic support with a versatile, easy to insert left ventricular assist device might help bridge patients to recovery or to the next therapy, and improve the outcomes.
METHODS: Patients developing cardiogenic shock or low cardiac output syndrome after being weaned off cardiopulmonary bypass were enrolled in a prospective single-arm feasibility study (RECOVER I). The primary safety endpoint was the frequency of major adverse events (death, stroke) at 30 days or discharge, whichever was longer. The primary efficacy endpoint was survival of the patient to implementation of the next therapy, which included recovery at 30 days after device removal and bridge-to-other-therapy.
RESULTS: Sixteen patients provided informed consent and were enrolled in the study. Hemodynamics improved immediately after the initiation of mechanical support: cardiac index, 1.65 versus 2.7 L/min/m(2) (P = .0001); mean arterial pressure, 71.4 versus 83.1 mm Hg (P = .01); and pulmonary artery diastolic pressure, 28.0 versus 19.8 mm Hg (P < .0001). The pump provided an average of 4.0 ± 0.6 L/min of flow for an average duration of 3.7 ± 2.9 days (range, 1.7-12.6). The primary safety endpoint occurred in 2 patients (13%; 1 stroke and 1 death). For the primary efficacy endpoint, recovery of the native heart function was obtained in 93% of the patients discharged, with bridge-to-other-therapy in 7%. Survival to 30 days, 3 months, and 1 year was 94%, 81%, and 75%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The use of the Impella 5.0/left direct device is safe and feasible in patients presenting with postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock. The device was rapidly inserted, enabled early support, and yielded favorable outcomes.
Copyright © 2013. Published by Mosby, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22405676     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.01.067

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  24 in total

Review 1.  Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices in Cardiogenic Shock.

Authors:  Aditya Mandawat; Sunil V Rao
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 6.546

Review 2.  The Impella Device: Historical Background, Clinical Applications and Future Directions.

Authors:  James J Glazier; Amir Kaki
Journal:  Int J Angiol       Date:  2018-12-20

3.  Acute Cardiac Unloading and Recovery: Proceedings of the 4th Annual Acute Cardiac Unloading and REcovery (A-CURE) symposium held on 30 August 2019 in Paris, France.

Authors: 
Journal:  Interv Cardiol       Date:  2019-11-18

Review 4.  Contemporary mechanical circulatory support therapy for postcardiotomy shock.

Authors:  Shinichi Fukuhara; Koji Takeda; Arthur Reshad Garan; Paul Kurlansky; Jonathan Hastie; Yoshifumi Naka; Hiroo Takayama
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2016-02-13

5.  New Impella Cardiac Power Device Used in Patient with Cardiogenic Shock due to Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Marek Cena; Frances Karam; Rajesh Ramineni; Wissam Khalife; Alejandro Barbagelata
Journal:  Int J Angiol       Date:  2014-12-02

Review 6.  Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Devices: A Health Technology Assessment.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2017-02-07

Review 7.  Defining the role for percutaneous mechanical circulatory support devices for medically refractory heart failure.

Authors:  Navin K Kapur; Marwan F Jumean
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2013-06

Review 8.  Advanced Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices for Cardiogenic Shock.

Authors:  P Elliott Miller; Michael A Solomon; Dorothea McAreavey
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 7.598

Review 9.  Clinical Applications of Extracorporeal Membranous Oxygenation: A Mini-Review.

Authors:  Jiun Hsu; Chih-Hsien Wang; Shu-Chien Huang; Hsi-Yu Yu; Nai-Hsin Chi; I-Hui Wu; Chih-Yang Chan; Chung-I Chang; Shoei-Shen Wang; Yih-Sharng Chen
Journal:  Acta Cardiol Sin       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 2.672

10.  Microaxial Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device as a Bridge to Transplantation after LVAD Malfunction.

Authors:  Heidi J Reich; Aamir Shah; Babak Azarbal; Jon Kobashigawa; Jaime Moriguchi; Lawrence Czer; Fardad Esmailian
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2015-12-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.