Literature DB >> 23389701

Defining the role for percutaneous mechanical circulatory support devices for medically refractory heart failure.

Navin K Kapur1, Marwan F Jumean.   

Abstract

Despite significant advances in the management of heart failure, short-term mortality due to advanced heart failure and cardiogenic shock remains high. Developed over the past few decades, percutaneous circulatory support devices offer a rapid and effective approach to slow the downward spiral of hemodynamic instability in patients presenting with decompensated heart failure until a more definitive strategy is pursued or patients recover. This review will discuss the goals of percutaneous circulatory support, the types of devices currently available, and the most recent clinical datasets examining the utility of these devices.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23389701      PMCID: PMC5864116          DOI: 10.1007/s11897-013-0132-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep        ISSN: 1546-9530


  40 in total

1.  The RECOVER I: a multicenter prospective study of Impella 5.0/LD for postcardiotomy circulatory support.

Authors:  Bartley P Griffith; Mark B Anderson; Louis E Samuels; Walter E Pae; Yoshifumi Naka; O Howard Frazier
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2012-03-09       Impact factor: 5.209

2.  Impella LP 2.5 for left ventricular unloading during venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support.

Authors:  Michael S Koeckert; Ulrich P Jorde; Yoshifumi Naka; Jeffrey W Moses; Hiroo Takayama
Journal:  J Card Surg       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.620

3.  Left ventricular unloading in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients is safe and feasible and provides acute and sustained left ventricular recovery.

Authors:  Krischan D Sjauw; Maurice Remmelink; Jan Baan; Kayan Lam; Annemarie E Engström; René J van der Schaaf; Marije M Vis; Karel T Koch; Jan P van Straalen; Jan G P Tijssen; Bas A J M de Mol; Robbert J de Winter; Jan J Piek; José P S Henriques
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2008-03-11       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 4.  Myocardial reperfusion injury.

Authors:  Derek M Yellon; Derek J Hausenloy
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-09-13       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Reversal of cardiogenic shock by percutaneous left atrial-to-femoral arterial bypass assistance.

Authors:  H Thiele; B Lauer; R Hambrecht; E Boudriot; H A Cohen; G Schuler
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2001-12-11       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Randomized comparison of intra-aortic balloon support with a percutaneous left ventricular assist device in patients with revascularized acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock.

Authors:  Holger Thiele; Peter Sick; Enno Boudriot; Klaus-Werner Diederich; Rainer Hambrecht; Josef Niebauer; Gerhard Schuler
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2005-02-25       Impact factor: 29.983

7.  A randomized multicenter clinical study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the TandemHeart percutaneous ventricular assist device versus conventional therapy with intraaortic balloon pumping for treatment of cardiogenic shock.

Authors:  Daniel Burkhoff; Howard Cohen; Corinna Brunckhorst; William W O'Neill
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 4.749

Review 8.  Right ventricular failure after cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Gus J Vlahakes
Journal:  Cardiol Clin       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 2.213

9.  Percutaneous intraaortic balloon insertion.

Authors:  D Bregman; A B Nichols; M B Weiss; E R Powers; E C Martin; W J Casarella
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1980-08       Impact factor: 2.778

10.  Outcomes and long-term quality-of-life of patients supported by extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for refractory cardiogenic shock.

Authors:  Alain Combes; Pascal Leprince; Charles-Edouard Luyt; Nicolas Bonnet; Jean-Louis Trouillet; Philippe Léger; Alain Pavie; Jean Chastre
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 7.598

View more
  4 in total

1.  Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support for Cardiogenic Shock.

Authors:  Kevin J Morine; Navin K Kapur
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2016-01

2.  Abdominal Positioning of the Next-Generation Intra-Aortic Fluid Entrainment Pump (Aortix) Improves Cardiac Output in a Swine Model of Heart Failure.

Authors:  Shiva K Annamalai; Michele L Esposito; Lara A Reyelt; Peter Natov; Lena E Jorde; Richard H Karas; Navin K Kapur
Journal:  Circ Heart Fail       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 8.790

3.  Effect of cardiogenic shock hospital volume on mortality in patients with cardiogenic shock.

Authors:  Shahzad Shaefi; Brian O'Gara; Robb D Kociol; Karen Joynt; Ariel Mueller; Junaid Nizamuddin; Eitezaz Mahmood; Daniel Talmor; Sajid Shahul
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2015-01-05       Impact factor: 5.501

Review 4.  Temporary mechanical circulatory support: a review of the options, indications, and outcomes.

Authors:  Nisha A Gilotra; Gerin R Stevens
Journal:  Clin Med Insights Cardiol       Date:  2015-02-03
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.