PURPOSE: Intraoperative electron beam radiation therapy (IOERT) involves a modified strategy of conventional radiation therapy and surgery. The lack of specific planning tools limits the spread of this technique. The purpose of the present study is to describe a new simulation and planning tool and its initial evaluation by clinical users. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The tool works on a preoperative computed tomography scan. A physician contours regions to be treated and protected and simulates applicator positioning, calculating isodoses and the corresponding dose--volume histograms depending on the selected electron energy. Three radiation oncologists evaluated data from 15 IOERT patients, including different tumor locations. Segmentation masks, applicator positions, and treatment parameters were compared. RESULTS: High parameter agreement was found in the following cases: three breast and three rectal cancer, retroperitoneal sarcoma, and rectal and ovary monotopic recurrences. All radiation oncologists performed similar segmentations of tumors and high-risk areas. The average applicator position difference was 1.2 ± 0.95 cm. The remaining cancer sites showed higher deviations because of differences in the criteria for segmenting high-risk areas (one rectal, one pancreas) and different surgical access simulated (two rectal, one Ewing sarcoma). CONCLUSIONS: The results show that this new tool can be used to simulate IOERT cases involving different anatomic locations, and that preplanning has to be carried out with specialized surgical input.
PURPOSE: Intraoperative electron beam radiation therapy (IOERT) involves a modified strategy of conventional radiation therapy and surgery. The lack of specific planning tools limits the spread of this technique. The purpose of the present study is to describe a new simulation and planning tool and its initial evaluation by clinical users. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The tool works on a preoperative computed tomography scan. A physician contours regions to be treated and protected and simulates applicator positioning, calculating isodoses and the corresponding dose--volume histograms depending on the selected electron energy. Three radiation oncologists evaluated data from 15 IOERT patients, including different tumor locations. Segmentation masks, applicator positions, and treatment parameters were compared. RESULTS: High parameter agreement was found in the following cases: three breast and three rectal cancer, retroperitoneal sarcoma, and rectal and ovary monotopic recurrences. All radiation oncologists performed similar segmentations of tumors and high-risk areas. The average applicator position difference was 1.2 ± 0.95 cm. The remaining cancer sites showed higher deviations because of differences in the criteria for segmenting high-risk areas (one rectal, one pancreas) and different surgical access simulated (two rectal, one Ewing sarcoma). CONCLUSIONS: The results show that this new tool can be used to simulate IOERT cases involving different anatomic locations, and that preplanning has to be carried out with specialized surgical input.
Authors: Esther Carbó-Laso; Pablo Sanz-Ruiz; José Antonio Calvo-Haro; Miguel Cuervo-Dehesa; Rubén Pérez-Mañanes; Lydia Mediavilla-Santos; Coral Sánchez-Pérez; Ana Álvarez-González; Javier Vaquero-Martín Journal: Int J Clin Oncol Date: 2017-07-17 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Felipe A Calvo; Morena Sallabanda; Claudio V Sole; Carmen Gonzalez; Laura Alonso Murillo; Javier Martinez-Villanueva; Juan A Santos; Javier Serrano; Ana Alavrez; Jose Blanco; Ana Calin; Marina Gomez-Espi; Miguel Lozano; Rafael Herranz Journal: Rep Pract Oncol Radiother Date: 2013-08-13
Authors: Juan López-Tarjuelo; Ana Bouché-Babiloni; Virginia Morillo-Macías; Agustín Santos-Serra; Carlos Ferrer-Albiach Journal: Rep Pract Oncol Radiother Date: 2016-10-19
Authors: F A Calvo; C V Sole; M E González; E D Tangco; J López-Tarjuelo; I Koubychine; J A Santos; J Pascau; R Herranz; C Ferrer Journal: Clin Transl Oncol Date: 2013-03-05 Impact factor: 3.405
Authors: Juan López-Tarjuelo; Ana Bouché-Babiloni; Virginia Morillo-Macías; Noelia de Marco-Blancas; Agustín Santos-Serra; Juan David Quirós-Higueras; Carlos Ferrer-Albiach Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2014-06-26 Impact factor: 3.621
Authors: F A Calvo; C V Sole; R Obregón; M Gómez-Espí; C González-San Segundo; L González-Bayón; E Alvarez; J L García-Sabrido Journal: Clin Transl Oncol Date: 2012-11-10 Impact factor: 3.405
Authors: Felipe A Calvo; Claudio V Sole; Javier Serrano; Marcos Rodriguez; Francisco Marcos; Alberto Muñoz-Calero; Jaime Zorrilla; Jose A Lopez-Baena; Benjamin Diaz-Zorita; Jose Luis García-Sabrido; Emilio del Valle Journal: J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Date: 2013-09-05 Impact factor: 4.553
Authors: Claudio V Sole; Felipe A Calvo; Carlos Ferrer; Javier Pascau; Hugo Marsiglia Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2014-06-14 Impact factor: 3.621
Authors: F A Calvo; C V Sole; R Martinez-Monge; I Azinovic; J Aristu; J Zudaire; J L Garcia-Sabrido; J M Berian Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2012-12-09 Impact factor: 3.621