Literature DB >> 22401588

A study on the learning curve of the robotic virtual reality simulator.

Sung Gu Kang1, Kyung Sook Yang, Young Hwii Ko, Seok Ho Kang, Hong Seok Park, Jeong Gu Lee, Je Jong Kim, Jun Cheon.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: A robotic virtual reality simulator (dV-Trainer™, Mimic Technologies) has been accepted as an effective training tool for the da Vinci(®) Surgical System (Intuitive Surgical, Inc.) in previous reports. However, there are no data available so far on how much time is required for an individual using the simulator to become proficient. We investigated how long and how many performances it takes to gain proficiency with the robotic virtual reality simulator through the learning curve. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The novice group included 20 medical students who had no previous experience. The "Tube 2" task, a program released for the dV-Trainer that imitates a vesicourethral anastomosis, was repeated more than 80 times to obtain the plateau of the learning curve. The learning curve of "Tube 2" was obtained through the S-curve trend model and cumulative sum control chart graph.
RESULTS: In the comparison of the initial and final sessions, every parameter such as mean time, collision, and critical errors was significantly improved. The repeat count for acquiring sufficient proficiency was 74 times, and the total amount of time invested for this was calculated as about 4 hours. The mean time at the plateau of the learning curve was 138 seconds.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that the robotic virtual reality simulator (dV-Trainer) can yield sufficient improvement in technical performance in the "Tube 2" task within 4 hours. The simulator improves the technical surgical performance, but the development of more applications to reflect actual surgical situations is needed to improve and maximize the usefulness of the simulator.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22401588     DOI: 10.1089/lap.2011.0452

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A        ISSN: 1092-6429            Impact factor:   1.878


  7 in total

Review 1.  Current state of virtual reality simulation in robotic surgery training: a review.

Authors:  Justin D Bric; Derek C Lumbard; Matthew J Frelich; Jon C Gould
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-08-25       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Can we become better robot surgeons through simulator practice?

Authors:  Ankit Patel; Meghna Patel; Nathaniel Lytle; Juan P Toro; Rachel L Medbery; Sheryl Bluestein; Sebastian D Perez; John F Sweeney; S Scott Davis; Edward Lin
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Can a virtual reality surgical simulation training provide a self-driven and mentor-free skills learning? Investigation of the practical influence of the performance metrics from the virtual reality robotic surgery simulator on the skill learning and associated cognitive workloads.

Authors:  Gyusung I Lee; Mija R Lee
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Virtual reality surgical simulators- a prerequisite for robotic surgery.

Authors:  Anupama Rajanbabu; Laura Drudi; Susie Lau; Joshua Z Press; Walter H Gotlieb
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-05-30

5.  Concurrent and predictive validation of robotic simulator Tube 3 module.

Authors:  Jae Yoon Kim; Seung Bin Kim; Jong Hyun Pyun; Hyung Keun Kim; Seok Cho; Jeong Gu Lee; Je Jong Kim; Jun Cheon; Seok Ho Kang; Sung Gu Kang
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2015-11-03

6.  Validation of a novel virtual reality simulator for robotic surgery.

Authors:  Henk W R Schreuder; Jan E U Persson; Richard G H Wolswijk; Ingmar Ihse; Marlies P Schijven; René H M Verheijen
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2014-01-30

7.  Virtual Reality in Medical Students' Education: Scoping Review.

Authors:  Haowen Jiang; Sunitha Vimalesvaran; Jeremy King Wang; Kee Boon Lim; Sreenivasulu Reddy Mogali; Lorainne Tudor Car
Journal:  JMIR Med Educ       Date:  2022-02-02
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.