Literature DB >> 22399202

Microbiology of cardiac implantable electronic device infections.

Maria Grazia Bongiorni1, Carlo Tascini, Enrico Tagliaferri, Andrea Di Cori, Ezio Soldati, Alessandro Leonildi, Giulio Zucchelli, Ilaria Ciullo, Francesco Menichetti.   

Abstract

AIMS: The aim of the study was to describe the microbiological findings of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) infection in the 2000-2011 period at the Cardiology Unit of New Santa Chiara Hospital in Pisa (Italy). METHODS AND
RESULTS: Removed CIED leads and pocket material were seeded on solid media and isolates tested for antimicrobial susceptibility with the Kirby Bauer method. Electrodes from 1204 patients were analysed and 854 (70.9%) tested positive. In 663 (77.6%) cases only one species was isolated, in 175 (20.5%) two species, and in 14 (1.8%) >2 species. In 116 cases material from the pocket was also cultured. The result was consistent with that from the electrodes in 69 (59%) cases. In 359 cases a blood sample was also obtained for culture. The result was consistent with that from the leads in 124 (35%) cases. A total of 1068 strains were isolated from electrodes. Gram-positive organisms were most frequently isolated (92.5% of isolates); particularly, coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS), mainly Staphylococcus epidermidis, in 69% of cases and Staphylococcus aureus in 13.8%, Gram-negative rods in 6.1%, yeasts in 1% and molds in 0.4%. Overall, Oxacillin resistance was 30%, in particular 33% among CoNS and 13% among S. aureus. Oxacillin resistance and quinolones resistance have increased in the period 2006-2011 with respect to the 5 years before. Seventeen percent of Enterobacteriaceae strains had a phenotype compatible with extended spectrum beta-lactamase expression.
CONCLUSIONS: Culture of the leads offers the possibility of an aetiological diagnosis in the majority of cases. When material from the pocket can be obtained, the microbiological result is often consistent with that from the electrodes, while species isolated from blood cultures are often different and more likely to be the result of contamination. Cardiac implantable electronic device infection is more often monomicrobial, CoNS are most frequently isolated and S. epidermidis is largely the main single agent. Very early infections were associated with S. aureus infection. The pattern of susceptibility to antimicrobials is in general that of community-acquired infections, although oxacillin resistance and quinolones resistance has increased in the last 5 years.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22399202     DOI: 10.1093/europace/eus044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Europace        ISSN: 1099-5129            Impact factor:   5.214


  27 in total

Review 1.  Current trends in the management of cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infections.

Authors:  Emanuele Durante-Mangoni; Irene Mattucci; Federica Agrusta; Marie-Françoise Tripodi; Riccardo Utili
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2012-06-29       Impact factor: 3.397

2.  The Diagnosis and Treatment of Pacemaker-Associated Infection.

Authors:  Michael Döring; Sergio Richter; Gerhard Hindricks
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 5.594

3.  In vivo detection of endotracheal tube biofilms in intubated critical care patients using catheter-based optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Roshan Dsouza; Darold R Spillman; Ronit Barkalifa; Guillermo L Monroy; Eric J Chaney; Karen C White; Stephen A Boppart
Journal:  J Biophotonics       Date:  2019-01-22       Impact factor: 3.207

4.  Role of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT in the diagnosis of infective endocarditis in patients with an implanted cardiac device: a prospective study.

Authors:  Maddalena Graziosi; Cristina Nanni; Massimiliano Lorenzini; Igor Diemberger; Rachele Bonfiglioli; Ferdinando Pasquale; Matteo Ziacchi; Mauro Biffi; Cristian Martignani; Michele Bartoletti; Fabio Tumietto; Giuseppe Boriani; Pier Luigi Viale; Stefano Fanti; Claudio Rapezzi
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 5.  Infective Endocarditis in the Elderly: Diagnostic and Treatment Options.

Authors:  M P Ursi; E Durante Mangoni; R Rajani; J Hancock; J B Chambers; B Prendergast
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 6.  Micafungin for Candida albicans pacemaker-associated endocarditis: a case report and review of the literature.

Authors:  Carlo Tascini; Maria Grazia Bongiorni; Enrico Tagliaferri; Antonello Di Paolo; Sarah Flammini; Ezio Soldati; Alessandro Leonildi; Andrea Di Cori; Francesco Menichetti
Journal:  Mycopathologia       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 2.574

Review 7.  Approach to Diagnosis of Cardiovascular Implantable-Electronic-Device Infection.

Authors:  Daniel C DeSimone; M Rizwan Sohail
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2018-06-25       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Management of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Infection.

Authors:  Cristian Podoleanu; Jean-Claude Deharo
Journal:  Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev       Date:  2014-11-29

9.  Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Infections; Long-Term Outcome after Extraction and Antibiotic Treatment.

Authors:  Jonas Hörnsten; Louise Axelsson; Katarina Westling
Journal:  Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2021-07-06

10.  Influence of the type of pathogen on the clinical course of infectious complications related to cardiac implantable electronic devices.

Authors:  Anna Polewczyk; Wojciech Jacheć; Luca Segreti; Maria Grazia Bongiorni; Andrzej Kutarski
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-21       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.