OBJECTIVE: Compared to nonanxious depressed patients, anxious depressed patients respond less to pharmacotherapy, prompting consideration of alternate treatments. Based on the transdiagnostic principles of cognitive therapy (CT), we predicted that anxious depressed patients would respond as well to CT as nonanxious depressed patients. METHOD: Adults (n = 523) with recurrent major depressive disorder received 12-14 weeks of CT as part of the Continuation Phase Cognitive Therapy Relapse Prevention Trial. Anxious depressed patients (n = 264; 50.4%) were compared to nonanxious depressed patients (n = 259; 49.6%) on demographic variables, initial severity, attrition, and rates and patterns of response and remission. RESULTS: Anxious depressed patients presented with greater illness severity and had significantly lower response (55.3 vs. 68.3%) and remission rates (26.9 vs. 40.2%) based on clinician-administered measures. By contrast, smaller between-group differences for attrition, and for response (59.1 vs. 64.9%) and remission (41.7 vs. 48.7%) rates on self-report measures were not significant. Further, anxious depressed patients had greater speed of improvement on self-reported anxiety symptom severity and clinician-rated depressive and anxiety symptom severity measures. CONCLUSION: Consistent with prior reports, anxious depressed patients presented with greater severity and, following CT, had lower response and remission rates on clinician-administered scales. However, anxious depressed patients improved more rapidly and response and remission rates on self-report measures were not significantly different from nonanxious depressed patients. Our findings suggest that anxious depressed patients may simply need additional time or more CT sessions to reach outcomes fully comparable to those of less anxious patients.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: Compared to nonanxious depressedpatients, anxious depressedpatients respond less to pharmacotherapy, prompting consideration of alternate treatments. Based on the transdiagnostic principles of cognitive therapy (CT), we predicted that anxious depressedpatients would respond as well to CT as nonanxious depressedpatients. METHOD: Adults (n = 523) with recurrent major depressive disorder received 12-14 weeks of CT as part of the Continuation Phase Cognitive Therapy Relapse Prevention Trial. Anxious depressedpatients (n = 264; 50.4%) were compared to nonanxious depressedpatients (n = 259; 49.6%) on demographic variables, initial severity, attrition, and rates and patterns of response and remission. RESULTS:Anxious depressedpatients presented with greater illness severity and had significantly lower response (55.3 vs. 68.3%) and remission rates (26.9 vs. 40.2%) based on clinician-administered measures. By contrast, smaller between-group differences for attrition, and for response (59.1 vs. 64.9%) and remission (41.7 vs. 48.7%) rates on self-report measures were not significant. Further, anxious depressedpatients had greater speed of improvement on self-reported anxiety symptom severity and clinician-rated depressive and anxiety symptom severity measures. CONCLUSION: Consistent with prior reports, anxious depressedpatients presented with greater severity and, following CT, had lower response and remission rates on clinician-administered scales. However, anxious depressedpatients improved more rapidly and response and remission rates on self-report measures were not significantly different from nonanxious depressedpatients. Our findings suggest that anxious depressedpatients may simply need additional time or more CT sessions to reach outcomes fully comparable to those of less anxiouspatients.
Authors: Joseph M Trombello; Jeffrey R Vittengl; Wayne H Denton; Abu Minhajuddin; Michael E Thase; Robin B Jarrett Journal: Behav Ther Date: 2018-12-06
Authors: Robin B Jarrett; Abu Minhajuddin; Howard Gershenfeld; Edward S Friedman; Michael E Thase Journal: JAMA Psychiatry Date: 2013-11 Impact factor: 21.596
Authors: Jeffrey R Vittengl; Lee Anna Clark; Jasper A J Smits; Michael E Thase; Robin B Jarrett Journal: J Affect Disord Date: 2018-08-25 Impact factor: 4.839
Authors: Gay Florian; Allison Singier; Bruno Aouizerate; Francesco Salvo; Thomas C M Bienvenu Journal: Front Psychiatry Date: 2022-07-01 Impact factor: 5.435
Authors: Jasper A J Smits; Stefan G Hofmann; David Rosenfield; Lindsey B DeBoer; Paul T Costa; Naomi M Simon; Conall O'Cleirigh; Alicia E Meuret; Luana Marques; Michael W Otto; Mark H Pollack Journal: J Consult Clin Psychol Date: 2013-08-12
Authors: R C Kessler; H M van Loo; K J Wardenaar; R M Bossarte; L A Brenner; D D Ebert; P de Jonge; A A Nierenberg; A J Rosellini; N A Sampson; R A Schoevers; M A Wilcox; A M Zaslavsky Journal: Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci Date: 2016-01-26 Impact factor: 6.892