IMPORTANCE: Strategies to improve the course of recurrent major depressive disorder have great public health relevance. To reduce the risk of relapse/recurrence after acute phase cognitive therapy (CT), a continuation phase model of therapy may improve outcomes. OBJECTIVES: To test the efficacy of continuation phase CT (C-CT) and fluoxetine for relapse prevention in a pill placebo (PBO)-controlled randomized trial and compare the durability of prophylaxis after discontinuation of treatments. DESIGN: A sequential, 3-stage design with an acute phase (all patients received 12 weeks of CT); 8-month experimental phase (responders at higher risk were randomized to C-CT, fluoxetine, or PBO); and 24 months of longitudinal, posttreatment follow-up. SETTING:Two university-based specialty clinics. PATIENTS: A total of 523 adults with recurrent major depressive disorder began acute phase CT, of which 241 higher-risk responders were randomized and 181 subsequently entered the follow-up. INTERVENTIONS:Cognitive therapy responders at higher risk for relapse were randomized to receive 8 months of C-CT (n = 86), fluoxetine (n = 86), or PBO (n = 69). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Survival analyses of relapse/recurrence rates, as determined by blinded evaluators using DSM-IV criteria and the Longitudinal Interval Follow-up Evaluation. RESULTS As predicted, the C-CT or fluoxetine groups were significantly less likely to relapse than the PBO group across 8 months. Relapse/recurrence rates for C-CT and fluoxetine were nearly identical during the 8 months of treatment, although C-CT patients were more likely to accept randomization, stayed in treatment longer, and attended more sessions than those in the fluoxetine and PBO groups. Contrary to prediction, relapse/recurrence rates following the discontinuation of C-CT and fluoxetine did not differ. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Relapse risk was reduced by both C-CT and fluoxetine in an enriched randomization sampling only CT responders. The preventive effects of C-CT were not significantly more durable than those of fluoxetine after treatment was stopped, suggesting that some higher-risk patients may require alternate longer-term interventions. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifiers: NCT00118404, NCT00183664, and NCT00218764.
RCT Entities:
IMPORTANCE: Strategies to improve the course of recurrent major depressive disorder have great public health relevance. To reduce the risk of relapse/recurrence after acute phase cognitive therapy (CT), a continuation phase model of therapy may improve outcomes. OBJECTIVES: To test the efficacy of continuation phase CT (C-CT) and fluoxetine for relapse prevention in a pill placebo (PBO)-controlled randomized trial and compare the durability of prophylaxis after discontinuation of treatments. DESIGN: A sequential, 3-stage design with an acute phase (all patients received 12 weeks of CT); 8-month experimental phase (responders at higher risk were randomized to C-CT, fluoxetine, or PBO); and 24 months of longitudinal, posttreatment follow-up. SETTING: Two university-based specialty clinics. PATIENTS: A total of 523 adults with recurrent major depressive disorder began acute phase CT, of which 241 higher-risk responders were randomized and 181 subsequently entered the follow-up. INTERVENTIONS: Cognitive therapy responders at higher risk for relapse were randomized to receive 8 months of C-CT (n = 86), fluoxetine (n = 86), or PBO (n = 69). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Survival analyses of relapse/recurrence rates, as determined by blinded evaluators using DSM-IV criteria and the Longitudinal Interval Follow-up Evaluation. RESULTS As predicted, the C-CT or fluoxetine groups were significantly less likely to relapse than the PBO group across 8 months. Relapse/recurrence rates for C-CT and fluoxetine were nearly identical during the 8 months of treatment, although C-CTpatients were more likely to accept randomization, stayed in treatment longer, and attended more sessions than those in the fluoxetine and PBO groups. Contrary to prediction, relapse/recurrence rates following the discontinuation of C-CT and fluoxetine did not differ. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Relapse risk was reduced by both C-CT and fluoxetine in an enriched randomization sampling only CT responders. The preventive effects of C-CT were not significantly more durable than those of fluoxetine after treatment was stopped, suggesting that some higher-risk patients may require alternate longer-term interventions. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifiers: NCT00118404, NCT00183664, and NCT00218764.
Authors: Sona Dimidjian; Steven D Hollon; Keith S Dobson; Karen B Schmaling; Robert J Kohlenberg; Michael E Addis; Robert Gallop; Joseph B McGlinchey; David K Markley; Jackie K Gollan; David C Atkins; David L Dunner; Neil S Jacobson Journal: J Consult Clin Psychol Date: 2006-08
Authors: L L Judd; H S Akiskal; J D Maser; P J Zeller; J Endicott; W Coryell; M P Paulus; J L Kunovac; A C Leon; T I Mueller; J A Rice; M B Keller Journal: J Affect Disord Date: 1998-09 Impact factor: 4.839
Authors: Claudi L H Bockting; Hermien J Elgersma; Gerard D van Rijsbergen; Peter de Jonge; Johan Ormel; Erik Buskens; A Dennis Stant; Peter J de Jong; Frenk P M L Peeters; Marcus J H Huibers; Arnoud Arntz; Peter Muris; Willem A Nolen; Aart H Schene; Steven D Hollon Journal: BMC Psychiatry Date: 2011-01-12 Impact factor: 3.630
Authors: Boadie W Dunlop; Devon LoParo; Becky Kinkead; Tanja Mletzko-Crowe; Steven P Cole; Charles B Nemeroff; Helen S Mayberg; W Edward Craighead Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2019-02-15 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Jamie C Kennedy; Boadie W Dunlop; Linda W Craighead; Charles B Nemeroff; Helen S Mayberg; W Edward Craighead Journal: J Consult Clin Psychol Date: 2018-02
Authors: Betsy D Kennard; Graham J Emslie; Taryn L Mayes; Paul A Nakonezny; Jessica M Jones; Aleksandra A Foxwell; Jessica King Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2014-10 Impact factor: 18.112