Literature DB >> 20975325

Are treatment preferences relevant in response to serotonergic antidepressants and cognitive-behavioral therapy in depressed primary care patients? Results from a randomized controlled trial including a patients' choice arm.

Roland Mergl1, Verena Henkel, Antje-Kathrin Allgaier, Dietmar Kramer, Martin Hautzinger, Ralf Kohnen, James Coyne, Ulrich Hegerl.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the influence of depressed patients' preferences and expectations about treatments upon treatment outcome. We investigated whether better clinical outcome in depressed primary care patients is associated with receiving their preferred treatment.
METHODS: Within a randomized placebo-controlled single-centre 10-week trial with 5 arms (sertraline; placebo; cognitive-behavioral group therapy, CBT-G; moderated self-help group control; treatment with sertraline or CBT-G according to patients' choice), outcomes for 145 primary care patients with mild-to-moderate depressive disorders according to DSM-IV criteria were investigated. Preference for medication versus psychotherapy was assessed at screening using a single item. Post-baseline difference scores for the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17) were used to assess treatment outcome (mixed-model repeated-measures regression analysis).
RESULTS: Depressed patients receiving their preferred treatment (n = 63), whether sertraline or CBT-G, responded significantly better than those who did not receive their preferred therapy (n = 54; p = 0.001). The difference in outcome between both groups was 8.0 points on the HAMD-17 for psychotherapy and 2.9 points on the HAMD-17 for treatment with antidepressants. Results were not explained by differences in depression severity or dropout rates.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients' relative preference for medication versus psychotherapy should be considered when offering a treatment because receiving the preferred treatment conveys an additional and clinically relevant benefit (HAMD-17: +2.9 points for drugs; +8.0 points for CBT-G) in outcome.
Copyright © 2010 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20975325     DOI: 10.1159/000318772

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychother Psychosom        ISSN: 0033-3190            Impact factor:   17.659


  32 in total

1.  Treatment Satisfaction Among Patients Taking Antidepressant Medication.

Authors:  Jesús López-Torres Hidalgo; Yolanda López Gallardo; Ignacio Párraga Martínez; José María Del Campo Del Campo; Alejandro Villena Ferrer; Susana Morena Rayo
Journal:  Community Ment Health J       Date:  2015-04-02

2.  Recommendations on screening for depression in adults.

Authors:  Michel Joffres; Alejandra Jaramillo; James Dickinson; Gabriela Lewin; Kevin Pottie; Elizabeth Shaw; Sarah Connor Gorber; Marcello Tonelli
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2013-05-13       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Client preferences affect treatment satisfaction, completion, and clinical outcome: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Oliver Lindhiem; Charles B Bennett; Christopher J Trentacosta; Caitlin McLear
Journal:  Clin Psychol Rev       Date:  2014-06-16

4.  Patient Preferences and Acceptability of Evidence-Based and Novel Treatments for Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder.

Authors:  Sapana R Patel; Hanga Galfavy; Marcia B Kimeldorf; Lisa B Dixon; Helen Blair Simpson
Journal:  Psychiatr Serv       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 3.084

Review 5.  Treatment of co-occurring anxiety disorders and substance use disorders.

Authors:  R Kathryn McHugh
Journal:  Harv Rev Psychiatry       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.732

6.  Outcomes of acute phase cognitive therapy in outpatients with anxious versus nonanxious depression.

Authors:  Jasper A J Smits; Abu Minhajuddin; Michael E Thase; Robin B Jarrett
Journal:  Psychother Psychosom       Date:  2012-03-03       Impact factor: 17.659

7.  Depression beliefs, treatment preference, and outcomes in a randomized trial for major depressive disorder.

Authors:  Boadie W Dunlop; Mary E Kelley; Tanja C Mletzko; Cristina M Velasquez; W Edward Craighead; Helen S Mayberg
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  2011-11-26       Impact factor: 4.791

8.  A comparison of maternal outcomes from an alcohol, tobacco, and other drug prevention program for mothers choosing an intervention versus being randomized.

Authors:  Hilary F Byrnes; Brenda A Miller; Nicole Laborde
Journal:  Health Educ Behav       Date:  2012-04-13

9.  Evaluation of self-reported work ability and usefulness of interventions among sick-listed patients.

Authors:  Charlotte Wåhlin; Kerstin Ekberg; Jan Persson; Lars Bernfort; Birgitta Öberg
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2013-03

Review 10.  Effect of Treatment Preference in Randomized Controlled Trials: Systematic Review of the Literature and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Dimittri Delevry; Quang A Le
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 3.883

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.