Literature DB >> 23984031

Improving vaginal examinations performed by midwives.

Rhoda S Muliira1, Vidya Seshan, Shanthi Ramasubramaniam.   

Abstract

A vaginal examination (VE) is an essential part of midwifery care, and is routinely performed when assessing the progress of labour. As evidence shows that during labour women may find VEs unpleasant, embarrassing and sometimes painful, the aim of this article is to review literature on the use of VEs during labour and to synthesise information from the available literature on how to provide an effective VE. The studies considered were retrieved from three databases (the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature [CINAHL], SCOPUS and MEDLINE) using the following search terms: "VEs in labour", "midwives and use of VEs" and "women experiences of VEs in labour". The literature reviewed suggests that midwives are not careful about VEs. Therefore, a concerted effort is needed to pay attention to the frequency of VEs, the management of pain and distress, information-giving and the preferences of the patient, so that the patient can feel in control during a VE.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Labour; Midwifery; Midwifery care; Vagina; Vaginal Examination

Year:  2013        PMID: 23984031      PMCID: PMC3749030     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J        ISSN: 2075-051X


  25 in total

1.  Supervision in action: developing a guidance paper on consent and treatment of minors.

Authors:  Michelle Kulkielka
Journal:  RCM Midwives J       Date:  2002-05

2.  Perception of intimate pelvic examination by gynaecological clinic attendees in rural Southeast Nigeria.

Authors:  Umeora Ouj; G O Igberase; J N Eze; B N Ejikeme
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2010-10-05       Impact factor: 2.344

Review 3.  Critical incident analysis: informed consent and the use of vaginal examinations during labour.

Authors:  Edel O'Loughlin
Journal:  RCM Midwives       Date:  2003-08

4.  A clinical audit of the number of vaginal examinations in labor: a NOVEL idea.

Authors:  Noelle Borders; Robyn Lawton; Shannon R Martin
Journal:  J Midwifery Womens Health       Date:  2012-02-10       Impact factor: 2.388

5.  The purple line as a measure of labour progress: a longitudinal study.

Authors:  Ashley Shepherd; Helen Cheyne; Susan Kennedy; Colette McIntosh; Maggie Styles; Catherine Niven
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2010-09-16       Impact factor: 3.007

6.  Strong discomfort during vaginal examination: why consider a history of abuse?

Authors:  Katarina Swahnberg; Barbro Wijma; Karin Siwe
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  2011-04-05       Impact factor: 2.435

7.  The landscape of caring for women: a narrative study of midwifery practice.

Authors:  Holly Powell Kennedy; Maureen T Shannon; Usa Chuahorm; M Kathryn Kravetz
Journal:  J Midwifery Womens Health       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.388

8.  Making the diagnosis of labour: midwives' diagnostic judgement and management decisions.

Authors:  Helen Cheyne; Dawn W Dowding; Vanora Hundley
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.187

9.  Interobserver agreement in intrapartum estimation of fetal head station.

Authors:  Eckhart Buchmann; Elena Libhaber
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2008-01-28       Impact factor: 3.561

10.  Prevalence and risk factors of childbirth-related post-traumatic stress symptoms.

Authors:  Maryam Modarres; Sedigheh Afrasiabi; Parvin Rahnama; Ali Montazeri
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2012-09-03       Impact factor: 3.007

View more
  2 in total

1.  Intrapartum ultrasound assessment of cervical dilatation and its value in detecting active labor.

Authors:  Yaw A Wiafe; Bill Whitehead; Heather Venables; Edward T Dassah; Torbjørn M Eggebø
Journal:  J Ultrasound       Date:  2018-07-28

2.  Potential excess of vaginal examinations during the management of labor: frequency and associated factors in 13 Peruvian hospitals.

Authors:  Jessica Hanae Zafra-Tanaka; Renee Montesinos-Segura; Pamela D Flores-Gonzales; Alvaro Taype-Rondan
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2019-10-10       Impact factor: 3.223

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.