Literature DB >> 22397765

Opposite effects of microchimerism on breast and colon cancer.

Mads Kamper-Jørgensen1, Robert J Biggar, Anne Tjønneland, Henrik Hjalgrim, Niels Kroman, Klaus Rostgaard, Casey L Stamper, Anja Olsen, Anne-Marie N Andersen, Vijayakrishna K Gadi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Detection of Y chromosome, thought to originate from previous pregnancies with a male fetus, is common in women. Lower concentrations have been reported in women with breast cancer than cancer-free women. Data in women with other types of cancer are sparse. The purpose of the study was to determine whether the lower concentrations predate cancer diagnosis, and whether a possible beneficial effect was specific to breast cancer.
METHODS: We conducted a prospective case-cohort study of 50-64-year-old Danish women enrolled in the diet, cancer and health cohort. Blood samples and questionnaire data were obtained during 1993-1997 when all women were cancer-free. In 2006 all women were followed up for incident breast and colon cancer in national registers. In blinded analyses, we analysed buffy coat DNA for Y chromosome (DYS14) as a marker of male microchimerism.
RESULTS: We detected male microchimerism in 70% of 272 cancer-free women, 40% of 89 women who later developed breast cancer, and 90% of 67 women who later developed colon cancer. The corresponding odds ratios were 0.30 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.17-0.52) for breast, and 3.9 (95%CI 1.6-9.5) for colon cancer.
CONCLUSION: Detection of male microchimerism was strongly associated with reduced risk of developing breast cancer and also the increased risk of developing colon cancer. Confirmatory findings based on an improved study design, failure to identify important confounders and the strength of the associations lead us to believe that microchimerism may be highly relevant to later cancer development. However, the present study does not allow us to identify the underlying biological mechanisms.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22397765     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2012.02.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


  22 in total

1.  Microchimeric Cells, Sex Chromosome Aneuploidies and Cancer.

Authors:  Deniz Taştemir Korkmaz; Osman Demirhan; Deniz Abat; Bülent Demirberk; Erdal Tunç; Sedat Kuleci
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2015-05-24       Impact factor: 3.201

Review 2.  Outcome of patients with pregnancy during or after breast cancer: a review of the recent literature.

Authors:  J Raphael; M E Trudeau; K Chan
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.677

3.  Statistical Methods for Unusual Count Data: Examples From Studies of Microchimerism.

Authors:  Katherine A Guthrie; Hilary S Gammill; Mads Kamper-Jørgensen; Anne Tjønneland; Vijayakrishna K Gadi; J Lee Nelson; Wendy Leisenring
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2016-11-15       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  Low microchimeric cell density in tumors suggests alternative antineoplastic mechanism.

Authors:  Timothy W Jolis; Brenna M Brucker; Christoph Schorl; James N Butera; Peter J Quesenberry
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2017-03-22       Impact factor: 3.064

5.  Prognostic impact of pregnancy after breast cancer according to estrogen receptor status: a multicenter retrospective study.

Authors:  Hatem A Azim; Niels Kroman; Marianne Paesmans; Shari Gelber; Nicole Rotmensz; Lieveke Ameye; Leticia De Mattos-Arruda; Barbara Pistilli; Alvaro Pinto; Maj-Britt Jensen; Octavi Cordoba; Evandro de Azambuja; Aron Goldhirsch; Martine J Piccart; Fedro A Peccatori
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-11-19       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Fetal microchimerism in human brain tumors.

Authors:  Lauren Broestl; Joshua B Rubin; Sonika Dahiya
Journal:  Brain Pathol       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 6.508

7.  The occurrence of fetal microchimeric cells in endometrial tissues is a very common phenomenon in benign uterine disorders, and the lower prevalence of fetal microchimerism is associated with better uterine cancer prognoses.

Authors:  Ilona Hromadnikova; Katerina Kotlabova; Petra Pirkova; Pavla Libalova; Zdenka Vernerova; Bohuslav Svoboda; Eduard Kucera
Journal:  DNA Cell Biol       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 3.311

8.  Microchimerism of male origin in a cohort of Danish girls.

Authors:  Amanda Cecilie Müller; Marianne Antonius Jakobsen; Torben Barington; Allan Arthur Vaag; Louise Groth Grunnet; Sjurdur Frodi Olsen; Mads Kamper-Jørgensen
Journal:  Chimerism       Date:  2016-08-11

Review 9.  Novel insights into the link between fetal cell microchimerism and maternal cancers.

Authors:  Valentina Cirello; Laura Fugazzola
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 4.553

10.  Predictors of male microchimerism.

Authors:  Mads Kamper-Jørgensen; Laust Hvas Mortensen; Anne-Marie Nybo Andersen; Henrik Hjalgrim; Vijayakrishna K Gadi; Anne Tjønneland
Journal:  Chimerism       Date:  2012-07-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.