Literature DB >> 28332165

Low microchimeric cell density in tumors suggests alternative antineoplastic mechanism.

Timothy W Jolis1, Brenna M Brucker2, Christoph Schorl3, James N Butera4, Peter J Quesenberry4.   

Abstract

Microchimerism has generally been shown to protect against cancer (Gilmore et al. in Exp Hematol 36(9):1073-1077, 2008). The mechanism of how this occurs is an area of intense study, as it may lead to new cancer treatments. The leading theory is that microchimeric cells perform immune surveillance by directly fighting cancerous cells and that they also act as stem cells, repairing damaged tissue (Khosrotehrani et al. in JAMA 292:75-80, 2004). However, there is conflicting evidence to support this theory. Several small studies have found few microchimeric cells in tumor tissue (Gadi in Breast Cancer Res Treat 121(1):241-244, 2010; Cirello et al. in Int J Cancer 126:2874-2878, 2010), while another study contradicted these findings by showing microchimeric cells clustered around tumor tissue (O'Donoghue et al. in Reprod Biomed Online 16:382-390, 2008). To date, we have designed the largest and broadest study to investigate this question of whether microchimeric cells really do cluster at tumor tissue. We analyzed 245 samples from a broad range of cancer types. Using PCR for the male chromosome marker TSPY1, we identified only 12 out of 245 samples with microchimerism for a rate of 4.9% (95% confidence interval 2.2-7.6%). Five of these samples were confirmed using Y fluorescence in situ hybridization. This rate of 4.9% microchimerism is the lowest reported in any study. The low percentage of microchimerism observed in our broad study suggests that microchimeric cells do not invade tumors to fight off neoplasm.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer genetics; Immunosurveillance; Microchimerism; Oncology; Oncopathology; Pathology; Tumor

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28332165     DOI: 10.1007/s12032-017-0921-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Oncol        ISSN: 1357-0560            Impact factor:   3.064


  7 in total

1.  Fetal microchimerism in women with breast cancer.

Authors:  Vijayakrishna K Gadi; J Lee Nelson
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2007-10-01       Impact factor: 12.701

2.  Fetal microchimerism in breast from women with and without breast cancer.

Authors:  Vijayakrishna K Gadi
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2009-09-19       Impact factor: 4.872

3.  Opposite effects of microchimerism on breast and colon cancer.

Authors:  Mads Kamper-Jørgensen; Robert J Biggar; Anne Tjønneland; Henrik Hjalgrim; Niels Kroman; Klaus Rostgaard; Casey L Stamper; Anja Olsen; Anne-Marie N Andersen; Vijayakrishna K Gadi
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2012-03-05       Impact factor: 9.162

4.  Transfer of fetal cells with multilineage potential to maternal tissue.

Authors:  Kiarash Khosrotehrani; Kirby L Johnson; Dong Hyun Cha; Robert N Salomon; Diana W Bianchi
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-07-07       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Microchimeric fetal cells cluster at sites of tissue injury in lung decades after pregnancy.

Authors:  Keelin O'Donoghue; Hanan A Sultan; Faisal A Al-Allaf; Jonathan R Anderson; Josephine Wyatt-Ashmead; Nicholas M Fisk
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.828

6.  Fetal cell microchimerism in papillary thyroid cancer: studies in peripheral blood and tissues.

Authors:  Valentina Cirello; Michela Perrino; Carla Colombo; Marina Muzza; Marcello Filopanti; Leonardo Vicentini; Paolo Beck-Peccoz; Laura Fugazzola
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 7.396

7.  Fetal-maternal microchimerism in normal parous females and parous female cancer patients.

Authors:  Gary L Gilmore; Bushra Haq; Richard K Shadduck; Sri Lakshmi Jasthy; John Lister
Journal:  Exp Hematol       Date:  2008-05-27       Impact factor: 3.084

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.