Literature DB >> 22395536

A new single chamber implantable defibrillator with atrial sensing: a practical demonstration of sensing and ease of implantation.

Dietmar Bänsch1, Ralph Schneider, Ibrahim Akin, Cristoph A Nienaber.   

Abstract

Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) terminate ventricular tachycardia (VT) and ventricular fibrillation (VF) with high efficacy and can protect patients from sudden cardiac death (SCD). However, inappropriate shocks may occur if tachycardias are misdiagnosed. Inappropriate shocks are harmful and impair patient quality of life. The risk of inappropriate therapy increases with lower detection rates programmed in the ICD. Single-chamber detection poses greater risks for misdiagnosis when compared with dual-chamber devices that have the benefit of additional atrial information. However, using a dual-chamber device merely for the sake of detection is generally not accepted, since the risks associated with the second electrode may outweigh the benefits of detection. Therefore, BIOTRONIK developed a ventricular lead called the Linox(SMART) S DX, which allows for the detection of atrial signals from two electrodes positioned at the atrial part of the ventricular electrode. This device contains two ring electrodes; one that contacts the atrial wall at the junction of the superior vena cava (SVC) and one positioned at the free floating part of the electrode in the atrium. The excellent signal quality can only be achieved by a special filter setting in the ICD (Lumax 540 and 740 VR-T DX, BIOTRONIK). Here, the ease of implantation of the system will be demonstrated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22395536      PMCID: PMC3399500          DOI: 10.3791/3750

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis Exp        ISSN: 1940-087X            Impact factor:   1.355


  8 in total

1.  Complication rates associated with pacemaker or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator generator replacements and upgrade procedures: results from the REPLACE registry.

Authors:  Jeanne E Poole; Marye J Gleva; Theofanie Mela; Mina K Chung; Daniel Z Uslan; Richard Borge; Venkateshwar Gottipaty; Timothy Shinn; Dan Dan; Leon A Feldman; Hanscy Seide; Stuart A Winston; John J Gallagher; Jonathan J Langberg; Kevin Mitchell; Richard Holcomb
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2010-10-04       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Do current dual chamber cardioverter defibrillators have advantages over conventional single chamber cardioverter defibrillators in reducing inappropriate therapies? A randomized, prospective study.

Authors:  I Deisenhofer; C Kolb; G Ndrepepa; J Schreieck; M Karch; S Schmieder; B Zrenner; C Schmitt
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2001-02

3.  Dual-chamber implantable cardioverter-defibrillator selection is associated with increased complication rates and mortality among patients enrolled in the NCDR implantable cardioverter-defibrillator registry.

Authors:  Thomas A Dewland; Cara N Pellegrini; Yongfei Wang; Gregory M Marcus; Edmund Keung; Paul D Varosy
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2011-08-30       Impact factor: 24.094

4.  Real world evaluation of dual-zone ICD and CRT-D programming compared to single-zone programming: the ALTITUDE REDUCES study.

Authors:  F Roosevelt Gilliam; David L Hayes; John P Boehmer; John Day; Paul A Heidenreich; Milan Seth; Paul W Jones; Kenneth M Stein; Leslie A Saxon
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2011-05-31

5.  Comparison of a novel, single-lead atrial sensing system with a dual-chamber implantable cardioverter-defibrillator system in patients without antibradycardia pacing indications: results of a randomized study.

Authors:  Christian Sticherling; Markus Zabel; Sebastian Spencker; Udo Meyerfeldt; Lars Eckardt; Steffen Behrens; Michael Niehaus
Journal:  Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol       Date:  2010-12-14

6.  Implantation of a dual chamber pacing and sensing single pass defibrillation lead.

Authors:  R Gradaus; M Block; A Dorszewski; C Schriever; D Hammel; H H Scheld; M Borggrefe; G Breithardt; D Böcker
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 1.976

7.  Multicenter experiences with a single lead electrode for dual chamber ICD systems.

Authors:  M Niehaus; A Schuchert; S Thamasett; D Pfeiffer; T Korte; M Pichlmaier; B Panning; R Belke; J Tebbenjohanns
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 1.976

8.  The 1+1 trial: a prospective trial of a dual- versus a single-chamber implantable defibrillator in patients with slow ventricular tachycardias.

Authors:  Dietmar Bänsch; Frank Steffgen; Gerian Grönefeld; Christian Wolpert; Dirk Böcker; Ralph-Uwe Mletzko; Wolfgang Schöls; Karlheinz Seidl; Michael Piel; Feifan Ouyang; Stefan H Hohnloser; Karl-Heinz Kuck
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2004-08-23       Impact factor: 29.690

  8 in total
  2 in total

1.  Psychiatric disorders and quality of life in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ana Claudia C de Ornelas Maia; Gastão Soares-Filho; Valeska Pereira; Antonio Egidio Nardi; Adriana Cardoso Silva
Journal:  Prim Care Companion CNS Disord       Date:  2013-04-18

2.  Home monitoring report from a single lead Lumax DX implantable cardioverter defibrillator: New observations in a new system.

Authors:  Yuval Konstantino; Alex Kleiman; Guy Amit
Journal:  J Arrhythm       Date:  2016-01-25
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.