Literature DB >> 22391058

A computational model of use-dependent motor recovery following a stroke: optimizing corticospinal activations via reinforcement learning can explain residual capacity and other strength recovery dynamics.

David J Reinkensmeyer1, Emmanuel Guigon, Marc A Maier.   

Abstract

This paper describes a computational model of use-dependent recovery of movement strength following a stroke. The model frames the problem of strength recovery as that of learning appropriate activations of residual corticospinal neurons to their target motoneuronal pools. For example, for an agonist/antagonist muscle pair, we assume the motor system must learn to activate preserved agonist-exciting corticospinal neurons and deactivate preserved antagonist-exciting corticospinal neurons. The model incorporates a biologically plausible reinforcement learning algorithm for adjusting cell activation patterns-stochastic search-using generated limb force as the teaching signal to adjust the synaptic weights that determine cell activations. The model makes predictions consistent with clinical and brain imaging data, such as that patients can achieve an increase in strength after appearing to reach a recovery plateau (i.e., "residual capacity"), that the differential effect of a dose of movement practice will be greater earlier in recovery, and that force-related brain activation will increase in secondary motor areas following a stroke. An interesting prediction that could be explored clinically is that temporarily inhibiting subpopulations of more powerfully connected corticospinal neurons during late movement training will allow the motor system to optimize corticospinal neurons with a weaker influence, whose optimization was blocked by the rapid optimization of more strongly connected neurons early in training.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22391058      PMCID: PMC3678524          DOI: 10.1016/j.neunet.2012.02.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neural Netw        ISSN: 0893-6080


  59 in total

1.  Motor outcome after subcortical stroke: MEPs correlate with hand strength but not dexterity.

Authors:  Gary W Thickbroom; Michelle L Byrnes; Sarah A Archer; Frank L Mastaglia
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.708

2.  Modeling reaching impairment after stroke using a population vector model of movement control that incorporates neural firing-rate variability.

Authors:  David J Reinkensmeyer; Mario G Iobbi; Leonard E Kahn; Derek G Kamper; Craig D Takahashi
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.026

3.  Longitudinal study of motor recovery after stroke: recruitment and focusing of brain activation.

Authors:  A Feydy; R Carlier; A Roby-Brami; B Bussel; F Cazalis; L Pierot; Y Burnod; M A Maier
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 7.914

4.  Improvements in the signal-to-noise ratio of motor cortex cells distinguish early versus late phases of motor skill learning.

Authors:  William J Kargo; Douglas A Nitz
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-06-16       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 5.  What's new in new technologies for upper extremity rehabilitation?

Authors:  Sylvain Brochard; Johanna Robertson; Béatrice Médée; Olivier Rémy-Néris
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 5.710

6.  Movement smoothness changes during stroke recovery.

Authors:  Brandon Rohrer; Susan Fasoli; Hermano Igo Krebs; Richard Hughes; Bruce Volpe; Walter R Frontera; Joel Stein; Neville Hogan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-09-15       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Preservation of directly stimulated muscle strength in hemiplegia due to stroke.

Authors:  William M Landau; Shirley A Sahrmann
Journal:  Arch Neurol       Date:  2002-09

Review 8.  Treatment interventions for the paretic upper limb of stroke survivors: a critical review.

Authors:  Susan Barreca; Steven L Wolf; Susan Fasoli; Richard Bohannon
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.919

9.  Loss of strength contributes more to physical disability after stroke than loss of dexterity.

Authors:  Colleen G Canning; Louise Ada; Roger Adams; Nicholas J O'Dwyer
Journal:  Clin Rehabil       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.477

10.  Effects of passive-active movement training on upper limb motor function and cortical activation in chronic patients with stroke: a pilot study.

Authors:  Påvel Lindberg; Christina Schmitz; Hans Forssberg; Margareta Engardt; Jörgen Borg
Journal:  J Rehabil Med       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.912

View more
  13 in total

1.  Robotic Rehabilitator of the Rodent Upper Extremity: A System and Method for Assessing and Training Forelimb Force Production after Neurological Injury.

Authors:  Kelli G Sharp; Jaime E Duarte; Berkenesh Gebrekristos; Sergi Perez; Oswald Steward; David J Reinkensmeyer
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2016-01-18       Impact factor: 5.269

2.  Time-sensitive reorganization of the somatosensory cortex poststroke depends on interaction between Hebbian and homeoplasticity: a simulation study.

Authors:  Amarpreet Singh Bains; Nicolas Schweighofer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Robot Training With Vector Fields Based on Stroke Survivors' Individual Movement Statistics.

Authors:  Zachary A Wright; Emily Lazzaro; Kelly O Thielbar; James L Patton; Felix C Huang
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 3.802

4.  Machine-Based, Self-guided Home Therapy for Individuals With Severe Arm Impairment After Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Daniel K Zondervan; Renee Augsburger; Barbara Bodenhoefer; Nizan Friedman; David J Reinkensmeyer; Steven C Cramer
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 3.919

5.  Breaking Proportional Recovery After Stroke.

Authors:  Merav R Senesh; David J Reinkensmeyer
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2019-08-16       Impact factor: 3.919

6.  Simulation of variable impedance as an intervention for upper extremity motor exploration.

Authors:  Felix C Huang
Journal:  IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot       Date:  2017-07

7.  Technologies and combination therapies for enhancing movement training for people with a disability.

Authors:  David J Reinkensmeyer; Michael L Boninger
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2012-03-30       Impact factor: 4.262

8.  Perspectives for computational modeling of cell replacement for neurological disorders.

Authors:  James B Aimone; Jason P Weick
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 2.380

9.  Neuromotor recovery from stroke: computational models at central, functional, and muscle synergy level.

Authors:  Maura Casadio; Irene Tamagnone; Susanna Summa; Vittorio Sanguineti
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2013-08-22       Impact factor: 2.380

Review 10.  Computational neurorehabilitation: modeling plasticity and learning to predict recovery.

Authors:  David J Reinkensmeyer; Etienne Burdet; Maura Casadio; John W Krakauer; Gert Kwakkel; Catherine E Lang; Stephan P Swinnen; Nick S Ward; Nicolas Schweighofer
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2016-04-30       Impact factor: 5.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.