Literature DB >> 12464343

Motor outcome after subcortical stroke: MEPs correlate with hand strength but not dexterity.

Gary W Thickbroom1, Michelle L Byrnes, Sarah A Archer, Frank L Mastaglia.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitude and threshold are predictors of functional outcome in the early stages after stroke, and improvement in these parameters usually accompanies motor recovery. The aim of this study in patients with subcortical stroke was to determine whether there is a correlation between MEP amplitude and threshold and the degree of recovery of strength and dexterity in the affected hand.
METHODS: MEP amplitude and threshold were measured on the affected and unaffected sides in 23 patients who had suffered a subcortical ischaemic stroke up to 23 years previously. Grip strength was measured using a hand-held dynamometer and dexterity was assessed using a modification of the McCarron test battery.
RESULTS: Grip strength correlated with both MEP amplitude and threshold (r=0.49 and r=-0.54, respectively, P<0.05), whereas the McCarron score for motor dexterity did not correlate significantly with either of these MEP parameters.
CONCLUSIONS: Grip strength and dexterity correlate differentially with MEP parameters of excitability and conduction in the corticospinal pathway after recovery in patients with subcortical stroke. Grip strength is dependent on restoration of corticospinal excitability and conduction whereas additional factors such as cortical reorganization may underlie recovery of motor dexterity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12464343     DOI: 10.1016/s1388-2457(02)00318-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 1388-2457            Impact factor:   3.708


  26 in total

1.  The nature of hand motor impairment after stroke and its treatment.

Authors:  Preeti Raghavan
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2007-06

Review 2.  Modulation of brain plasticity in stroke: a novel model for neurorehabilitation.

Authors:  Giovanni Di Pino; Giovanni Pellegrino; Giovanni Assenza; Fioravante Capone; Florinda Ferreri; Domenico Formica; Federico Ranieri; Mario Tombini; Ulf Ziemann; John C Rothwell; Vincenzo Di Lazzaro
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2014-09-09       Impact factor: 42.937

Review 3.  Spontaneous and Therapeutic-Induced Mechanisms of Functional Recovery After Stroke.

Authors:  Jessica M Cassidy; Steven C Cramer
Journal:  Transl Stroke Res       Date:  2016-04-25       Impact factor: 6.829

4.  A computational model of use-dependent motor recovery following a stroke: optimizing corticospinal activations via reinforcement learning can explain residual capacity and other strength recovery dynamics.

Authors:  David J Reinkensmeyer; Emmanuel Guigon; Marc A Maier
Journal:  Neural Netw       Date:  2012-02-13

Review 5.  Neurochemical changes underpinning the development of adjunct therapies in recovery after stroke: A role for GABA?

Authors:  Ainslie Johnstone; Jacob M Levenstein; Emily L Hinson; Charlotte J Stagg
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 6.200

6.  The origins of neuromuscular fatigue post-stroke.

Authors:  S Knorr; T D Ivanova; T J Doherty; J A Campbell; S J Garland
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 7.  Contribution of transcranial magnetic stimulation to the understanding of functional recovery mechanisms after stroke.

Authors:  Michael A Dimyan; Leonardo G Cohen
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2009-09-18       Impact factor: 3.919

8.  TMS-evoked N100 responses as a prognostic factor in acute stroke.

Authors:  Paolo Manganotti; Michele Acler; Stefano Masiero; Alessandra Del Felice
Journal:  Funct Neurol       Date:  2015 Apr-Jun

9.  Finger strength, individuation, and their interaction: Relationship to hand function and corticospinal tract injury after stroke.

Authors:  Eric T Wolbrecht; Justin B Rowe; Vicky Chan; Morgan L Ingemanson; Steven C Cramer; David J Reinkensmeyer
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-02-03       Impact factor: 3.708

Review 10.  The corticospinal system and transcranial magnetic stimulation in stroke.

Authors:  Monica A Perez; Leonardo G Cohen
Journal:  Top Stroke Rehabil       Date:  2009 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.119

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.