Literature DB >> 26414700

Robotic Rehabilitator of the Rodent Upper Extremity: A System and Method for Assessing and Training Forelimb Force Production after Neurological Injury.

Kelli G Sharp1,2, Jaime E Duarte3, Berkenesh Gebrekristos2, Sergi Perez3, Oswald Steward2,4,5,6, David J Reinkensmeyer2,3,4.   

Abstract

Rodent models of spinal cord injury are critical for the development of treatments for upper limb motor impairment in humans, but there are few methods for measuring forelimb strength of rodents, an important outcome measure. We developed a novel robotic device--the Robotic Rehabilitator of the Rodent Upper Extremity (RUE)--that requires rats to voluntarily reach for and pull a bar to retrieve a food reward; the resistance of the bar can be programmed. We used RUE to train forelimb strength of 16 rats three times per week for 23 weeks before and 38 weeks after a mild (100 kdyne) unilateral contusion at the cervical level 5 (C5). We measured maximum force produced when RUE movement was unexpectedly blocked. We compared this blocked pulling force (BPF) to weekly measures of forelimb strength obtained with a previous, well-established method: the grip strength meter (GSM). Before injury, BPF was 2.6 times higher (BPF, 444.6 ± 19.1 g; GSM, 168.4 ± 3.1 g) and 4.9 times more variable (p < 0.001) than pulling force measured with the GSM; the two measurement methods were uncorrelated (R(2) = 0.03; p = 0.84). After injury, there was a significant decrease in BPF of 134.35 g ± 14.71 g (p < 0.001). Together, our findings document BPF as a repeatable measure of forelimb force production, sensitive to a mild spinal cord injury, which comes closer to measuring maximum force than the GSM and thus may provide a useful measure for quantifying the effects of treatment in rodent models of SCI.

Entities:  

Keywords:  grip strength; motor learning; motor system; rat; recovery of function; rehabilitation; robotics; spinal cord injury

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26414700      PMCID: PMC4779318          DOI: 10.1089/neu.2015.3987

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurotrauma        ISSN: 0897-7151            Impact factor:   5.269


  21 in total

1.  One day of motor training with amphetamine impairs motor recovery following spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Jamie K Wong; Oswald Steward
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 5.330

Review 2.  The emerging relationship between regenerative medicine and physical therapeutics.

Authors:  Fabrisia Ambrosio; Steven L Wolf; Anthony Delitto; G Kelley Fitzgerald; Stephen F Badylak; Michael L Boninger; Alan J Russell
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2010-10-28

3.  Paretic upper-limb strength best explains arm activity in people with stroke.

Authors:  Jocelyn E Harris; Janice J Eng
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2006-12-19

Review 4.  Motor training induces experience-specific patterns of plasticity across motor cortex and spinal cord.

Authors:  DeAnna L Adkins; Jeffery Boychuk; Michael S Remple; Jeffrey A Kleim
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2006-09-07

5.  Reaching training in rats with spinal cord injury promotes plasticity and task specific recovery.

Authors:  J Girgis; D Merrett; S Kirkland; G A S Metz; V Verge; K Fouad
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2007-10-10       Impact factor: 13.501

Review 6.  Rehabilitative training and plasticity following spinal cord injury.

Authors:  K Fouad; W Tetzlaff
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  2011-02-17       Impact factor: 5.330

7.  A computational model of use-dependent motor recovery following a stroke: optimizing corticospinal activations via reinforcement learning can explain residual capacity and other strength recovery dynamics.

Authors:  David J Reinkensmeyer; Emmanuel Guigon; Marc A Maier
Journal:  Neural Netw       Date:  2012-02-13

8.  Forelimb locomotor assessment scale (FLAS): novel assessment of forelimb dysfunction after cervical spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Kim D Anderson; Kelli G Sharp; Maura Hofstadter; Karen-Amanda Irvine; Marion Murray; Oswald Steward
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  2009-09-03       Impact factor: 5.330

Review 9.  Rat models of upper extremity impairment in stroke.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Kleim; Jeffery A Boychuk; DeAnna L Adkins
Journal:  ILAR J       Date:  2007

10.  A bilateral cervical contusion injury model in mice: assessment of gripping strength as a measure of forelimb motor function.

Authors:  Roberto M Aguilar; Oswald Steward
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  2009-10-06       Impact factor: 5.330

View more
  5 in total

1.  Investigating Motor Skill Learning Processes with a Robotic Manipulandum.

Authors:  Susan Leemburg; Maiko Iijima; Olivier Lambercy; Lauriane Nallet-Khosrofian; Roger Gassert; Andreas Luft
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2017-02-12       Impact factor: 1.355

Review 2.  Translational Challenges of Rat Models of Upper Extremity Dysfunction After Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  Laura Krisa; Madeline Runyen; Megan Ryan Detloff
Journal:  Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil       Date:  2018

Review 3.  Neuroplastic Changes Following Brain Ischemia and their Contribution to Stroke Recovery: Novel Approaches in Neurorehabilitation.

Authors:  Claudia Alia; Cristina Spalletti; Stefano Lai; Alessandro Panarese; Giuseppe Lamola; Federica Bertolucci; Fabio Vallone; Angelo Di Garbo; Carmelo Chisari; Silvestro Micera; Matteo Caleo
Journal:  Front Cell Neurosci       Date:  2017-03-16       Impact factor: 5.505

Review 4.  A narrative review of machine learning as promising revolution in clinical practice of scoliosis.

Authors:  Kai Chen; Xiao Zhai; Kaiqiang Sun; Haojue Wang; Changwei Yang; Ming Li
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-01

Review 5.  When Spinal Neuromodulation Meets Sensorimotor Rehabilitation: Lessons Learned From Animal Models to Regain Manual Dexterity After a Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  África Flores; Diego López-Santos; Guillermo García-Alías
Journal:  Front Rehabil Sci       Date:  2021-12-07
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.