Literature DB >> 25681649

A distributed network critical for selecting among tool-directed actions.

Christine E Watson1, Laurel J Buxbaum2.   

Abstract

Tools pose a challenge to the need to select actions appropriate for task goals and environmental constraints. For many tools (e.g., calculator), actions for "using" and "grasping-to-move" conflict with each other and may compete during selection. To date, little is known about the mechanisms that enable selection between possible tool actions or their neural substrates. The study of patients with chronic left hemisphere stroke, many of whom are deficient in tool-use action (apraxic), provides an opportunity to elucidate these issues. Here, 31 such patients pantomimed or recognized tool use actions for "conflict" and "non-conflict" tools. Voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping (VLSM), lesion subtraction, and tractographic overlap analyses were used to determine brain regions necessary for selecting among tool-directed actions. Lesions to posterior middle temporal gyrus (pMTG) and anterior intraparietal sulcus (aIPS) tended to impair production of use actions similarly for both conflict and non-conflict tools. By contrast, lesions to the supramarginal gyrus (SMG), inferior frontal gyrus (IFG)/anterior insula, and superior longitudinal fasciculus (SLF) specifically impaired production of use actions for conflict tools. Patients' errors on conflict tools suggested inappropriate selection of grasping actions and difficulty selecting single actions. Use/grasp conflict had no effect on action recognition. We suggest that the SMG/SLF/IFG pathway implements biased competition between possible tool actions, while aIPS and pMTG compute the structure-based and skilled use actions, respectively, that constitute input to this competitive process. This is the first study to demonstrate a reliable link between a characteristic of single tools (i.e., their association with different use and grasp actions) and action selection difficulties. Additionally, the data allow us to posit an SMG-involved subtype of apraxia characterized by an inability to resolve action competition.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Action selection; Apraxia; Inferior parietal lobe; Tool use; VLSM

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25681649      PMCID: PMC4385438          DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2015.01.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cortex        ISSN: 0010-9452            Impact factor:   4.027


  89 in total

1.  Neural correlates of a decision in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex of the macaque.

Authors:  J N Kim; M N Shadlen
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Actions speak louder than functions: the importance of manipulability and action in tool representation.

Authors:  Marion L Kellenbach; Matthew Brett; Karalyn Patterson
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2003-01-01       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Action concepts in the brain: an activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis.

Authors:  Christine E Watson; Eileen R Cardillo; Geena R Ianni; Anjan Chatterjee
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2013-04-11       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Human anterior intraparietal area subserves prehension: a combined lesion and functional MRI activation study.

Authors:  F Binkofski; C Dohle; S Posse; K M Stephan; H Hefter; R J Seitz; H J Freund
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 9.910

5.  Aphasic naming: what matters?

Authors:  L Nickels; D Howard
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 3.139

6.  Cognitive representations of hand posture in ideomotor apraxia.

Authors:  Laurel J Buxbaum; Angela Sirigu; Myrna F Schwartz; Roberta Klatzky
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.139

7.  Different left brain regions are essential for grasping a tool compared with its subsequent use.

Authors:  Jennifer Randerath; Georg Goldenberg; Will Spijkers; Yong Li; Joachim Hermsdörfer
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-06-22       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Response interference between functional and structural object-related actions is increased in patients with ideomotor apraxia.

Authors:  Steven A Jax; Laurel J Buxbaum
Journal:  J Neuropsychol       Date:  2012-04-20       Impact factor: 2.864

9.  Tool use and mechanical problem solving in apraxia.

Authors:  G Goldenberg; S Hagmann
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 3.139

10.  Optic ataxia: a specific disruption in visuomotor mechanisms. I. Different aspects of the deficit in reaching for objects.

Authors:  M T Perenin; A Vighetto
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 13.501

View more
  31 in total

1.  Movement Imitation via an Abstract Trajectory Representation in Dorsal Premotor Cortex.

Authors:  Aaron L Wong; Steven A Jax; Louisa L Smith; Laurel J Buxbaum; John W Krakauer
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-02-25       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Impact of correction factors in human brain lesion-behavior inference.

Authors:  Christoph Sperber; Hans-Otto Karnath
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2017-01-03       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Reply: apraxia: a gestural or a cognitive disorder?

Authors:  Laurel J Buxbaum; Allison D Shapiro; H Branch Coslett
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2014-08-29       Impact factor: 13.501

4.  A Connectomic Atlas of the Human Cerebrum-Chapter 3: The Motor, Premotor, and Sensory Cortices.

Authors:  Cordell M Baker; Joshua D Burks; Robert G Briggs; John R Sheets; Andrew K Conner; Chad A Glenn; Goksel Sali; Tressie M McCoy; James D Battiste; Daniel L O'Donoghue; Michael E Sughrue
Journal:  Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown)       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 2.703

Review 5.  Limb apraxia and the left parietal lobe.

Authors:  Laurel J Buxbaum; Jennifer Randerath
Journal:  Handb Clin Neurol       Date:  2018

6.  Word selection deficits and multiword speech.

Authors:  Tatiana T Schnur
Journal:  Cogn Neuropsychol       Date:  2017 Feb - Mar       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Reduced competition between tool action neighbors in left hemisphere stroke.

Authors:  Frank E Garcea; Harrison Stoll; Laurel J Buxbaum
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2019-06-19       Impact factor: 4.027

8.  Shared and Distinct Neuroanatomic Regions Critical for Tool-related Action Production and Recognition: Evidence from 131 Left-hemisphere Stroke Patients.

Authors:  Leyla Y Tarhan; Christine E Watson; Laurel J Buxbaum
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Differential Tuning of Ventral and Dorsal Streams during the Generation of Common and Uncommon Tool Uses.

Authors:  Heath E Matheson; Laurel J Buxbaum; Sharon L Thompson-Schill
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  The role of conflict, feedback, and action comprehension in monitoring of action errors: Evidence for internal and external routes.

Authors:  Cortney M Howard; Louisa L Smith; H Branch Coslett; Laurel J Buxbaum
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2019-02-14       Impact factor: 4.027

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.