Literature DB >> 22389760

Design of clinical trials for biomarker research in oncology.

Sumithra J Mandrekar1, Daniel J Sargent.   

Abstract

The developmental pathway from discovery to clinical practice for biomarkers and biomarker-directed therapies is complex. While several issues need careful consideration, two critical issues that surround the validation of biomarkers are the choice of clinical trial design (which is based on the strength of the preliminary evidence and marker prevalence) and the biomarker assay related issues surrounding the marker assessment methods such as the reliability and reproducibility of the assay. This review focuses on trial designs for marker validation, both in the setting of early phase trials for initial validation, as well as in the context of larger definitive trials. Designs for biomarker validation are broadly classified as retrospective (i.e., using data from previously well-conducted, randomized, controlled trials) or prospective (enrichment, allcomers or adaptive). We believe that the systematic evaluation and implementation of these design strategies are essential to accelerate the clinical validation of biomarker-guided therapy, thereby taking us a step closer to the goal of personalized medicine.

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 22389760      PMCID: PMC3290127          DOI: 10.4155/CLI.11.152

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Investig (Lond)        ISSN: 2041-6792


  44 in total

1.  Steady progress against HER2-positive breast cancer.

Authors:  Daniel F Hayes
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-10-06       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  A method for testing a prespecified subgroup in clinical trials.

Authors:  Yang Song; George Y H Chi
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2007-08-30       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Use of genomic signatures in therapeutics development in oncology and other diseases.

Authors:  R Simon; S-J Wang
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics J       Date:  2006 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.550

4.  HER2 status and benefit from adjuvant trastuzumab in breast cancer.

Authors:  Soonmyung Paik; Chungyeul Kim; Norman Wolmark
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-03-27       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 5.  Clinical trial designs for predictive marker validation in cancer treatment trials.

Authors:  Daniel J Sargent; Barbara A Conley; Carmen Allegra; Laurence Collette
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-03-20       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 6.  Molecular predictors of response to epidermal growth factor receptor antagonists in non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Lecia V Sequist; Daphne W Bell; Thomas J Lynch; Daniel A Haber
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-02-10       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Biospecimen reporting for improved study quality (BRISQ).

Authors:  Helen M Moore; Andrea B Kelly; Scott D Jewell; Lisa M McShane; Douglas P Clark; Renata Greenspan; Daniel F Hayes; Pierre Hainaut; Paula Kim; Elizabeth A Mansfield; Olga Potapova; Peter Riegman; Yaffa Rubinstein; Edward Seijo; Stella Somiari; Peter Watson; Heinz-Ulrich Weier; Claire Zhu; Jim Vaught
Journal:  Cancer Cytopathol       Date:  2011-03-22       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Trastuzumab plus adjuvant chemotherapy for operable HER2-positive breast cancer.

Authors:  Edward H Romond; Edith A Perez; John Bryant; Vera J Suman; Charles E Geyer; Nancy E Davidson; Elizabeth Tan-Chiu; Silvana Martino; Soonmyung Paik; Peter A Kaufman; Sandra M Swain; Thomas M Pisansky; Louis Fehrenbacher; Leila A Kutteh; Victor G Vogel; Daniel W Visscher; Greg Yothers; Robert B Jenkins; Ann M Brown; Shaker R Dakhil; Eleftherios P Mamounas; Wilma L Lingle; Pamela M Klein; James N Ingle; Norman Wolmark
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-10-20       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Wild-type KRAS is required for panitumumab efficacy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Rafael G Amado; Michael Wolf; Marc Peeters; Eric Van Cutsem; Salvatore Siena; Daniel J Freeman; Todd Juan; Robert Sikorski; Sid Suggs; Robert Radinsky; Scott D Patterson; David D Chang
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-03-03       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Genomic advances and their impact on clinical trial design.

Authors:  Sumithra J Mandrekar; Daniel J Sargent
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2009-07-13       Impact factor: 11.117

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Evolving notions on immune response in colorectal cancer and their implications for biomarker development.

Authors:  Fabio Grizzi; Gianluca Basso; Elena Monica Borroni; Tommaso Cavalleri; Paolo Bianchi; Sanja Stifter; Maurizio Chiriva-Internati; Alberto Malesci; Luigi Laghi
Journal:  Inflamm Res       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 4.575

Review 2.  Biomarker-Guided Non-Adaptive Trial Designs in Phase II and Phase III: A Methodological Review.

Authors:  Miranta Antoniou; Ruwanthi Kolamunnage-Dona; Andrea L Jorgensen
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2017-01-25

3.  Bayesian Two-stage Biomarker-based Adaptive Design for Targeted Therapy Development.

Authors:  Xuemin Gu; Nan Chen; Caimiao Wei; Suyu Liu; Vassiliki A Papadimitrakopoulou; Roy S Herbst; J Jack Lee
Journal:  Stat Biosci       Date:  2014-12-04

Review 4.  A review of phase II trial designs for initial marker validation.

Authors:  Sumithra J Mandrekar; Ming-Wen An; Daniel J Sargent
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 2.226

Review 5.  Next-generation clinical trials: Novel strategies to address the challenge of tumor molecular heterogeneity.

Authors:  Daniel V T Catenacci
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2014-10-18       Impact factor: 6.603

Review 6.  Methods for identification and confirmation of targeted subgroups in clinical trials: A systematic review.

Authors:  Thomas Ondra; Alex Dmitrienko; Tim Friede; Alexandra Graf; Frank Miller; Nigel Stallard; Martin Posch
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 1.051

Review 7.  Biomarker-Guided Adaptive Trial Designs in Phase II and Phase III: A Methodological Review.

Authors:  Miranta Antoniou; Andrea L Jorgensen; Ruwanthi Kolamunnage-Dona
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Mast cells as a potential prognostic marker in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Gianluigi Taverna; Guido Giusti; Mauro Seveso; Rodolfo Hurle; Piergiuseppe Colombo; Sanja Stifter; Fabio Grizzi
Journal:  Dis Markers       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 3.434

9.  Optimizing Trial Designs for Targeted Therapies.

Authors:  Thomas Ondra; Sebastian Jobjörnsson; Robert A Beckman; Carl-Fredrik Burman; Franz König; Nigel Stallard; Martin Posch
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-09-29       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.