Literature DB >> 22389243

Psychometric properties of within-person across-session variability in accuracy of cognitive performance.

Timothy A Salthouse1.   

Abstract

Although most psychological assessments are based on measures related to an individual's average level of performance, it has been proposed that measures of variability around one's average may provide unique individual difference information and have clinical significance. The current study investigated properties of within-person variability in measures of performance accuracy in a sample of more than 1,700 healthy adults. Contrary to what has been reported with measures of within-person variability in reaction time, measures of within-person variability in performance accuracy from different cognitive tests had weak correlations with one another, very low stability across time, and near-zero correlations with longitudinal change in cognitive abilities.

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2012        PMID： 22389243      PMCID： PMC3632781          DOI： 10.1177/1073191112438744

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Assessment        ISSN： 1073-1911


  27 in total

1.  Dealing with short-term fluctuation in longitudinal research.

Authors:  Timothy A Salthouse; John R Nesselroade
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2010-08-23       Impact factor: 4.077

2.  Within-person variability in response speed as an indicator of cognitive impairment in older adults.

Authors:  Esther Strauss; Allison A M Bielak; David Bunce; Michael A Hunter; David F Hultsch
Journal:  Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn       Date:  2007-11

3.  Implications of within-person variability in cognitive and neuropsychological functioning for the interpretation of change.

Authors:  Timothy A Salthouse
Journal:  Neuropsychology       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.295

4.  On the relation of mean reaction time and intraindividual reaction time variability.

Authors:  Florian Schmiedek; Martin Lövdén; Ulman Lindenberger
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2009-12

5.  Variability in reaction time performance of younger and older adults.

Authors:  David F Hultsch; Stuart W S MacDonald; Roger A Dixon
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 4.077

6.  Intraindividual variability is related to cognitive change in older adults: evidence for within-person coupling.

Authors:  Allison A M Bielak; David F Hultsch; Esther Strauss; Stuart W S MacDonald; Michael A Hunter
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2010-09

7.  Short-term variability in cognitive performance and the calibration of longitudinal change.

Authors:  Timothy A Salthouse; John R Nesselroade; Diane E Berish
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 4.077

8.  Intraindividual variability as a marker of neurological dysfunction: a comparison of Alzheimer's disease and Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Catherine L Burton; Esther Strauss; David F Hultsch; Alex Moll; Michael A Hunter
Journal:  J Clin Exp Neuropsychol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 2.475

9.  Staying on the job: the frontal lobes control individual performance variability.

Authors:  Donald T Stuss; Kelly J Murphy; Malcolm A Binns; Michael P Alexander
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2003-07-22       Impact factor: 13.501

10.  Age and sex differences in reaction time in adulthood: results from the United Kingdom Health and Lifestyle Survey.

Authors:  Geoff Der; Ian J Deary
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2006-03
View more
  5 in total

1.  Which Aspects of Social Support Are Associated With Which Cognitive Abilities for Which People?

Authors:  Claire G La Fleur; Timothy A Salthouse
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2017-10-01       Impact factor: 4.077

2.  Cognitive intraindividual variability and white matter integrity in aging.

Authors:  Nathalie Mella; Sandrine de Ribaupierre; Roy Eagleson; Anik de Ribaupierre
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2013-09-23

3.  Reliability and correlates of intraindividual variability in the oculomotor system.

Authors:  Marlou Nadine Perquin; Aline Bompas
Journal:  J Eye Mov Res       Date:  2019-10-02       Impact factor: 0.957

Review 4.  Sophisticated Statistics Cannot Compensate for Method Effects If Quantifiable Structure Is Compromised.

Authors:  Damian P Birney; Jens F Beckmann; Nadin Beckmann; Steven E Stemler
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-02-16

5.  Measuring longitudinal cognition: Individual tests versus composites.

Authors:  Erin M Jonaitis; Rebecca L Koscik; Lindsay R Clark; Yue Ma; Tobey J Betthauser; Sara E Berman; Samantha L Allison; Kimberly D Mueller; Bruce P Hermann; Carol A Van Hulle; Bradley T Christian; Barbara B Bendlin; Kaj Blennow; Henrik Zetterberg; Cynthia M Carlsson; Sanjay Asthana; Sterling C Johnson
Journal:  Alzheimers Dement (Amst)       Date:  2019-01-11
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.