Literature DB >> 19716836

In silico toxicology for the pharmaceutical sciences.

Luis G Valerio1.   

Abstract

The applied use of in silico technologies (a.k.a. computational toxicology, in silico toxicology, computer-assisted tox, e-tox, i-drug discovery, predictive ADME, etc.) for predicting preclinical toxicological endpoints, clinical adverse effects, and metabolism of pharmaceutical substances has become of high interest to the scientific community and the public. The increased accessibility of these technologies for scientists and recent regulations permitting their use for chemical risk assessment supports this notion. The scientific community is interested in the appropriate use of such technologies as a tool to enhance product development and safety of pharmaceuticals and other xenobiotics, while ensuring the reliability and accuracy of in silico approaches for the toxicological and pharmacological sciences. For pharmaceutical substances, this means active and impurity chemicals in the drug product may be screened using specialized software and databases designed to cover these substances through a chemical structure-based screening process and algorithm specific to a given software program. A major goal for use of these software programs is to enable industry scientists not only to enhance the discovery process but also to ensure the judicious use of in silico tools to support risk assessments of drug-induced toxicities and in safety evaluations. However, a great amount of applied research is still needed, and there are many limitations with these approaches which are described in this review. Currently, there is a wide range of endpoints available from predictive quantitative structure-activity relationship models driven by many different computational software programs and data sources, and this is only expected to grow. For example, there are models based on non-proprietary and/or proprietary information specific to assessing potential rodent carcinogenicity, in silico screens for ICH genetic toxicity assays, reproductive and developmental toxicity, theoretical prediction of human drug metabolism, mechanisms of action for pharmaceuticals, and newer models for predicting human adverse effects. How accurate are these approaches is both a statistical issue and challenge in toxicology. In this review, fundamental concepts and the current capabilities and limitations of this technology will be critically addressed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19716836     DOI: 10.1016/j.taap.2009.08.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol        ISSN: 0041-008X            Impact factor:   4.219


  35 in total

Review 1.  Designing antimicrobial peptides: form follows function.

Authors:  Christopher D Fjell; Jan A Hiss; Robert E W Hancock; Gisbert Schneider
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2011-12-16       Impact factor: 84.694

2.  Predictive modeling of chemical hazard by integrating numerical descriptors of chemical structures and short-term toxicity assay data.

Authors:  Ivan Rusyn; Alexander Sedykh; Yen Low; Kathryn Z Guyton; Alexander Tropsha
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2012-03-02       Impact factor: 4.849

3.  Facilitating adverse drug event detection in pharmacovigilance databases using molecular structure similarity: application to rhabdomyolysis.

Authors:  Santiago Vilar; Rave Harpaz; Herbert S Chase; Stefano Costanzi; Raul Rabadan; Carol Friedman
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 4.  Nanoparticles in Daily Life: Applications, Toxicity and Regulations.

Authors:  Ritu Gupta; Huan Xie
Journal:  J Environ Pathol Toxicol Oncol       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 3.567

5.  Computational Modeling of Mixture Toxicity.

Authors:  Mainak Chatterjee; Kunal Roy
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

6.  The Search for Herbal Antibiotics: An In-Silico Investigation of Antibacterial Phytochemicals.

Authors:  Mary Snow Setzer; Javad Sharifi-Rad; William N Setzer
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2016-09-12

Review 7.  From QSAR to QSIIR: searching for enhanced computational toxicology models.

Authors:  Hao Zhu
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2013

8.  Structure-activity relationship models for rat carcinogenesis and assessing the role mutagens play in model predictivity.

Authors:  C A Carrasquer; K Batey; S Qamar; A R Cunningham; S L Cunningham
Journal:  SAR QSAR Environ Res       Date:  2014-04-04       Impact factor: 3.000

Review 9.  Physiologically based pharmacokinetic models: integration of in silico approaches with micro cell culture analogues.

Authors:  A Chen; M L Yarmush; T Maguire
Journal:  Curr Drug Metab       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 3.731

10.  Designing QSARs for Parameters of High-Throughput Toxicokinetic Models Using Open-Source Descriptors.

Authors:  Daniel E Dawson; Brandall L Ingle; Katherine A Phillips; John W Nichols; John F Wambaugh; Rogelio Tornero-Velez
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2021-04-15       Impact factor: 9.028

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.