Literature DB >> 22387119

The accuracy of measuring glenohumeral motion with a surface humeral cuff.

David Hamming1, Jonathan P Braman, Vandana Phadke, Robert F LaPrade, Paula M Ludewig.   

Abstract

Conclusions about normal and pathologic shoulder motion are frequently made from studies using skin surface markers, yet accuracy of such sensors representing humeral motion is not well known. Nineteen subjects were investigated with flock of birds electromagnetic sensors attached to transcortical pins placed into the scapula and humerus, and a thermoplastic cuff secured on the arm. Subjects completed two repetitions of raising and lowering the arm in the sagittal, scapular and coronal planes, as well as shoulder internal and external rotation with the elbow at the side and abducted to 90°. Humeral motion was recorded simultaneously from surface and bone fixed sensors. The average magnitude of error was calculated for the surface and bone fixed measurements throughout the range of motion. ANOVA tested for differences across angles of elevation, raising and lowering, and differences in body mass index. For all five motions tested, the plane of elevation rotation average absolute error ranged from 0-2°, while the humeral elevation rotation average error ranged from 0-4°. The axial rotation average absolute error was much greater, ranging from 5° during elevation motions to approaching 30° at maximum excursion of internal/external rotation motions. Average absolute error was greater in subjects with body mass index greater than 25. Surface sensors are an accurate way of measuring humeral elevation rotations and plane of elevation rotations. Conversely, there is a large amount of average error for axial rotations when using a humeral cuff to measure glenohumeral internal/external rotation as the primary motion.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22387119      PMCID: PMC3327809          DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2012.02.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  14 in total

1.  Magnetic resonance-based motion analysis of the shoulder during elevation.

Authors:  H Graichen; T Stammberger; H Bonel; M Haubner; K H Englmeier; M Reiser; F Eckstein
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Tibiocalcaneal motion during running, measured with external and bone markers.

Authors:  C Reinschmidt; A J van Den Bogert; N Murphy; A Lundberg; B M Nigg
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 2.063

3.  3D shoulder position measurements using a six-degree-of-freedom electromagnetic tracking device.

Authors:  C.G.M. Meskers; H.M. Vermeulen; J.H. de Groot; F.C.T. van Der Helm; P.M. Rozing
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 2.063

4.  Dynamic measurements of three-dimensional scapular kinematics: a validation study.

Authors:  A R Karduna; P W McClure; L A Michener; B Sennett
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 2.097

Review 5.  ISB recommendation on definitions of joint coordinate systems of various joints for the reporting of human joint motion--Part II: shoulder, elbow, wrist and hand.

Authors:  Ge Wu; Frans C T van der Helm; H E J DirkJan Veeger; Mohsen Makhsous; Peter Van Roy; Carolyn Anglin; Jochem Nagels; Andrew R Karduna; Kevin McQuade; Xuguang Wang; Frederick W Werner; Bryan Buchholz
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  The role of the rotator interval capsule in passive motion and stability of the shoulder.

Authors:  D T Harryman; J A Sidles; S L Harris; F A Matsen
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Three-dimensional kinematics of glenohumeral elevation.

Authors:  K N An; A O Browne; S Korinek; S Tanaka; B F Morrey
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 3.494

8.  Effect of skin movement on the analysis of skeletal knee joint motion during running.

Authors:  C Reinschmidt; A J van den Bogert; B M Nigg; A Lundberg; N Murphy
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 2.712

9.  Kinematic and kinetic analysis of push-up exercise.

Authors:  K N An; S L Korinek; T Kilpela; S Edis
Journal:  Biomed Sci Instrum       Date:  1990

10.  Motion of the shoulder complex during multiplanar humeral elevation.

Authors:  Paula M Ludewig; Vandana Phadke; Jonathan P Braman; Daniel R Hassett; Cort J Cieminski; Robert F LaPrade
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 5.284

View more
  17 in total

Review 1.  Collecting shoulder kinematics with electromagnetic tracking systems and digital inclinometers: A review.

Authors:  Daniel C Hannah; Jason S Scibek
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2015-11-18

2.  The contribution of the scapula to active shoulder motion and self-assessed function in three hundred and fifty two patients prior to elective shoulder surgery.

Authors:  Jason E Hsu; David Andrew Hulet; Chris McDonald; Anastasia Whitson; Stacy M Russ; Frederick A Matsen
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-07-09       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Relationship Between Skin Intrinsic Fluorescence--an Indicator of Advanced Glycation End Products-and Upper Extremity Impairments in Individuals With Diabetes Mellitus.

Authors:  Kshamata M Shah; B Ruth Clark; Janet B McGill; Catherine E Lang; John Maynard; Michael J Mueller
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2015-04-09

4.  Validation of single-plane fluoroscopy and 2D/3D shape-matching for quantifying shoulder complex kinematics.

Authors:  Rebekah L Lawrence; Arin M Ellingson; Paula M Ludewig
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2017-12-08       Impact factor: 2.242

5.  The Impact of Decreased Scapulothoracic Upward Rotation on Subacromial Proximities.

Authors:  Rebekah L Lawrence; Jonathan P Braman; Paula M Ludewig
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2019-01-18       Impact factor: 4.751

6.  Shoulder limited joint mobility in people with diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Kshamata M Shah; B Ruth Clark; Janet B McGill; Catherine E Lang; Michael J Mueller
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2015-01-06       Impact factor: 2.063

7.  Can clinical observation differentiate individuals with and without scapular dyskinesis?

Authors:  Newton Y Miachiro; Paula M F Camarini; Helga T Tucci; Kevin J McQuade; Anamaria S Oliveira
Journal:  Braz J Phys Ther       Date:  2014 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.377

8.  Comparison of 3-dimensional shoulder complex kinematics in individuals with and without shoulder pain, part 1: sternoclavicular, acromioclavicular, and scapulothoracic joints.

Authors:  Rebekah L Lawrence; Jonathan P Braman; Robert F Laprade; Paula M Ludewig
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 4.751

9.  Comparison of 3-dimensional shoulder complex kinematics in individuals with and without shoulder pain, part 2: glenohumeral joint.

Authors:  Rebekah L Lawrence; Jonathan P Braman; Justin L Staker; Robert F Laprade; Paula M Ludewig
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 4.751

10.  Comparison of glenohumeral joint kinematics between manual wheelchair tasks and implications on the subacromial space: A biplane fluoroscopy study.

Authors:  Joseph D Mozingo; Mohsen Akbari-Shandiz; Meegan G Van Straaten; Naveen S Murthy; Beth A Schueler; David R Holmes; Cynthia H McCollough; Kristin D Zhao
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  2019-08-23       Impact factor: 2.368

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.