OBJECTIVE: Fiscal policies may form a solution in improving dietary intake. This study aimed to examine the effectiveness of varying taxing and subsiding schemes to stimulate healthier food purchases. METHODS: A randomized controlled trial with three levels of price reduction on healthy foods (no; 25%; 50%)×three levels of price increase on unhealthy foods (5%; 10%; 25%) factorial design was used. 150 participants were randomized into one of nine conditions and were asked to purchase groceries at a web-based supermarket. Data were collected in the Netherlands in January-February 2010 and analyzed using analysis of covariance. RESULTS: Subjects receiving 50% discount purchased significantly more healthy foods than subjects receiving no (mean difference=6.62 items, p<0.01) or 25% discount (mean difference=4.87 items, p<0.05). Moreover, these subjects purchased more vegetables (mean difference=821 g;p<0.05 compared to no discount). However, participants with the highest discount also purchased significantly more calories. No significant effects of the price increases on unhealthy foods were found. CONCLUSION: Price decreases are effective in stimulating healthy food purchases, but the proportion of healthy foods remains unaffected. Price increases up to 25% on unhealthier products do not significantly affect food purchases. Future studies are important to validate these results in real supermarkets and across different countries.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: Fiscal policies may form a solution in improving dietary intake. This study aimed to examine the effectiveness of varying taxing and subsiding schemes to stimulate healthier food purchases. METHODS: A randomized controlled trial with three levels of price reduction on healthy foods (no; 25%; 50%)×three levels of price increase on unhealthy foods (5%; 10%; 25%) factorial design was used. 150 participants were randomized into one of nine conditions and were asked to purchase groceries at a web-based supermarket. Data were collected in the Netherlands in January-February 2010 and analyzed using analysis of covariance. RESULTS: Subjects receiving 50% discount purchased significantly more healthy foods than subjects receiving no (mean difference=6.62 items, p<0.01) or 25% discount (mean difference=4.87 items, p<0.05). Moreover, these subjects purchased more vegetables (mean difference=821 g;p<0.05 compared to no discount). However, participants with the highest discount also purchased significantly more calories. No significant effects of the price increases on unhealthy foods were found. CONCLUSION: Price decreases are effective in stimulating healthy food purchases, but the proportion of healthy foods remains unaffected. Price increases up to 25% on unhealthier products do not significantly affect food purchases. Future studies are important to validate these results in real supermarkets and across different countries.
Authors: Lisa Harnack; J Michael Oakes; Brian Elbel; Timothy Beatty; Sarah Rydell; Simone French Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2016-11-01 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: David M Kern; Amy H Auchincloss; Mark F Stehr; Ana V Diez Roux; Kari A Moore; Genevieve P Kanter; Lucy F Robinson Journal: Prev Med Date: 2017-10-26 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: Karen Glanz; Annie Chung; Knashawn H Morales; Pui L Kwong; Douglas Wiebe; Donna Paulhamus Giordano; Colleen M Brensinger; Allison Karpyn Journal: Transl Behav Med Date: 2020-12-31 Impact factor: 3.046
Authors: Wilma Elzeline Waterlander; Yannan Jiang; Ingrid Hendrika Margaretha Steenhuis; Cliona Ni Mhurchu Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2015-04-28 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Dana Lee Olstad; Laksiri A Goonewardene; Linda J McCargar; Kim D Raine Journal: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Date: 2014-01-22 Impact factor: 6.457
Authors: Filipa Guerra; Silvia Stringhini; Peter Vollenweider; Gérard Waeber; Pedro Marques-Vidal Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2015-01-31 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Wilma E Waterlander; Ingrid H M Steenhuis; Michiel R de Boer; Albertine J Schuit; Jacob C Seidell Journal: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Date: 2013-05-16 Impact factor: 6.457