Literature DB >> 22386839

High-risk prostate cancer: from definition to contemporary management.

Patrick J Bastian1, Stephen A Boorjian, Alberto Bossi, Alberto Briganti, Axel Heidenreich, Stephen J Freedland, Francesco Montorsi, Mack Roach, Fritz Schröder, Hein van Poppel, Christian G Stief, Andrew J Stephenson, Michael J Zelefsky.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: High-risk prostate cancer (PCa) is a potentially lethal disease. It is clinically important to identify patients with high-risk PCa early on because they stand to benefit the most from curative therapy. Because of recent advances in PCa management, a multimodal approach may be advantageous.
OBJECTIVE: Define high-risk PCa, and identify the best diagnostic and treatment patterns for patients with clinically localized and locally advanced disease. A critical analysis of published results following monomodal and/or multimodal therapy for high-risk PCa patients was also performed. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A review of the literature was performed using the Medline, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science databases as well as the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: High-risk PCa accounts for ≤ 15% of all new diagnoses. Compared with patients with low- and intermediate-risk PCa, patients with high-risk PCa are at increased risk of treatment failure. Unfortunately, no contemporary randomized controlled trials comparing different treatment modalities exist. Evaluation of the results published to date shows that no single treatment can be universally recommended. Most often, a multimodal approach is warranted to optimize patient outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS: A significant minority of patients continue to present with high-risk PCa, which remains lethal in some cases. Outcomes following treatment of men with high-risk tumors have not substantially improved over time. However, not all high-risk patients are at the same risk of PCa progression and death. At present, a multimodal approach seems the best way to achieve acceptable outcomes for high-risk PCa patients.
Copyright © 2012. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22386839     DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.02.031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  47 in total

1.  Radical Prostatectomy and Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection in Kaiser Permanente Southern California: 15-Year Experience.

Authors:  Pooya Banapour; Andrew Schumacher; Jane C Lin; David S Finley
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2019

Review 2.  Imaging and evaluation of patients with high-risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Marc A Bjurlin; Andrew B Rosenkrantz; Luis S Beltran; Roy A Raad; Samir S Taneja
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 3.  High-risk prostate cancer-classification and therapy.

Authors:  Albert J Chang; Karen A Autio; Mack Roach; Howard I Scher
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 66.675

4.  Diffusion-weighted MRI in early assessment of tumour response to radiotherapy in high-risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  L Liu; N Wu; H Ouyang; J-R Dai; W-H Wang
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Clinical and oncological outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with nerve sparing vs. non-nerve sparing for high-risk prostate cancer cases.

Authors:  Kiyoshi Takahara; Makoto Sumitomo; Kosuke Fukaya; Takahito Jyoudai; Masashi Nishino; Masaru Hikichi; Kenji Zennami; Takuhisa Nukaya; Manabu Ichino; Naohiko Fukami; Hitomi Sasaki; Mamoru Kusaka; Ryoichi Shiroki
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 2.967

6.  The effect of wide resection during radical prostatectomy on surgical margins.

Authors:  Luke T Lavallée; Andrew Stokl; Sonya Cnossen; Ranjeeta Mallick; Chris Morash; Ilias Cagiannos; Rodney H Breau
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.862

7.  Contemporaneous comparison of open vs minimally-invasive radical prostatectomy for high-risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Phillip M Pierorazio; Jeffrey K Mullins; John B Eifler; Kipp Voth; Elias S Hyams; Misop Han; Christian P Pavlovich; Trinity J Bivalacqua; Alan W Partin; Mohamad E Allaf; Edward M Schaeffer
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2013-01-28       Impact factor: 5.588

8.  The importance of local control in high-risk locally advanced prostate cancer.

Authors:  S Sridharan; P Warde
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.677

9.  Validation of a genomic classifier that predicts metastasis following radical prostatectomy in an at risk patient population.

Authors:  R Jeffrey Karnes; Eric J Bergstralh; Elai Davicioni; Mercedeh Ghadessi; Christine Buerki; Anirban P Mitra; Anamaria Crisan; Nicholas Erho; Ismael A Vergara; Lucia L Lam; Rachel Carlson; Darby J S Thompson; Zaid Haddad; Benedikt Zimmermann; Thomas Sierocinski; Timothy J Triche; Thomas Kollmeyer; Karla V Ballman; Peter C Black; George G Klee; Robert B Jenkins
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2013-06-11       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 10.  Metabolic syndrome in prostate cancer: impact on risk and outcomes.

Authors:  Fatima H Karzai; Ravi A Madan; William L Dahut
Journal:  Future Oncol       Date:  2016-04-12       Impact factor: 3.404

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.