Literature DB >> 22385152

Water use for Shale-gas production in Texas, U.S.

Jean-Philippe Nicot1, Bridget R Scanlon.   

Abstract

Shale-gas production using hydraulic fracturing of mostly horizontal wells has led to considerable controversy over water-resource and environmental impacts. The study objective was to quantify net water use for shale-gas production using data from Texas, which is the dominant producer of shale gas in the U.S. with a focus on three major plays: the Barnett Shale (~15,000 wells, mid-2011), Texas-Haynesville Shale (390 wells), and Eagle Ford Shale (1040 wells). Past water use was estimated from well-completion data, and future water use was extrapolated from past water use constrained by shale-gas resources. Cumulative water use in the Barnett totaled 145 Mm(3) (2000-mid-2011). Annual water use represents ~9% of water use in Dallas (population 1.3 million). Water use in younger (2008-mid-2011) plays, although less (6.5 Mm(3) Texas-Haynesville, 18 Mm(3) Eagle Ford), is increasing rapidly. Water use for shale gas is <1% of statewide water withdrawals; however, local impacts vary with water availability and competing demands. Projections of cumulative net water use during the next 50 years in all shale plays total ~4350 Mm(3), peaking at 145 Mm(3) in the mid-2020s and decreasing to 23 Mm(3) in 2060. Current freshwater use may shift to brackish water to reduce competition with other users.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22385152     DOI: 10.1021/es204602t

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  15 in total

Review 1.  Extensive review of shale gas environmental impacts from scientific literature (2010-2015).

Authors:  Daniele Costa; João Jesus; David Branco; Anthony Danko; António Fiúza
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-04-28       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Local Perceptions of Hydraulic Fracturing Ahead of Exploratory Drilling in Eastern South Africa.

Authors:  Devan Allen McGranahan; Kevin P Kirkman
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2019-02-02       Impact factor: 3.266

3.  The integrity of oil and gas wells.

Authors:  Robert B Jackson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-07-09       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Time Series Analysis of Energy Production and Associated Landscape Fragmentation in the Eagle Ford Shale Play.

Authors:  Jon Paul Pierre; Michael H Young; Brad D Wolaver; John R Andrews; Caroline L Breton
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 3.266

5.  Comparison of Recent Oil and Gas, Wind Energy, and Other Anthropogenic Landscape Alteration Factors in Texas Through 2014.

Authors:  Jon Paul Pierre; Brad D Wolaver; Benjamin J Labay; Travis J LaDuc; Charles M Duran; Wade A Ryberg; Toby J Hibbitts; John R Andrews
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2018-03-05       Impact factor: 3.266

Review 6.  Organic Pollutants in Shale Gas Flowback and Produced Waters: Identification, Potential Ecological Impact, and Implications for Treatment Strategies.

Authors:  Andrii Butkovskyi; Harry Bruning; Stefan A E Kools; Huub H M Rijnaarts; Annemarie P Van Wezel
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 9.028

7.  Unconventional natural gas development did not result in detectable changes in water chemistry (within the South Fork Little Red River).

Authors:  Bradley J Austin; Erin Scott; Leslie Massey; Michelle A Evans-White; Sally Entrekin; Brian E Haggard
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2017-04-06       Impact factor: 2.513

8.  Feasible analysis of reusing flowback produced water in the operational performances of oil reservoirs.

Authors:  Afshin Davarpanah
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-10-20       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 9.  Critical evaluation of human health risks due to hydraulic fracturing in natural gas and petroleum production.

Authors:  Klaus-Michael Wollin; G Damm; H Foth; A Freyberger; T Gebel; A Mangerich; U Gundert-Remy; F Partosch; C Röhl; T Schupp; Jan G Hengstler
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2020-05-09       Impact factor: 5.153

10.  Controls on water use for thermoelectric generation: case study Texas, US.

Authors:  Bridget R Scanlon; Robert C Reedy; Ian Duncan; William F Mullican; Michael Young
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2013-09-16       Impact factor: 9.028

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.