BACKGROUND: Recent studies have demonstrated that trunk control likely plays a role in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury. Yet, the majority of ACL research remains focused on the lower limb, with limited information on the trunk position at the time of injury. HYPOTHESES: Athletes experiencing a noncontact ACL injury after a 1-legged landing position their center of mass (COM) more posterior from the base of support (BOS) at initial ground contact in comparison with uninjured athletes. The distance from the COM to the BOS (COM_BOS) is larger in female, as compared with male, athletes during 1-legged landing. STUDY DESIGN: Case control study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: Movie captures of 20 athletes performing a 1-legged landing maneuver resulting in a torn ACL were compared with matched (for gender, sport, and activity just before landing) movie captures of 20 athletes performing a similar maneuver that did not result in an ACL disruption (controls). The COM_BOS, trunk(G) angle, and limb(G) angle (both relative to the gravity vector) were measured in the sagittal plane at initial ground-foot contact. A 2-way ANOVA (injury status × gender) was used to examine the hypotheses. RESULTS: There was a significant difference in all 3 measures based on injury status but not on gender. The COM_BOS, normalized by femur length, and limb(G) angle were greater (Δ = 0.9, P < .001 and Δ = 16°, P = .004, respectively), and the trunk(G) angle was smaller (Δ = 12°, P = .016) in the participants who sustained an ACL injury as compared with controls. The average COM was calculated as 38 cm more posterior relative to the BOS in the participants who sustained an ACL injury as compared with controls. CONCLUSION: Landing with the COM far posterior to the BOS may be a risk factor for noncontact ACL injury and potentially can be addressed in prevention programs.
BACKGROUND: Recent studies have demonstrated that trunk control likely plays a role in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury. Yet, the majority of ACL research remains focused on the lower limb, with limited information on the trunk position at the time of injury. HYPOTHESES: Athletes experiencing a noncontact ACL injury after a 1-legged landing position their center of mass (COM) more posterior from the base of support (BOS) at initial ground contact in comparison with uninjured athletes. The distance from the COM to the BOS (COM_BOS) is larger in female, as compared with male, athletes during 1-legged landing. STUDY DESIGN: Case control study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: Movie captures of 20 athletes performing a 1-legged landing maneuver resulting in a torn ACL were compared with matched (for gender, sport, and activity just before landing) movie captures of 20 athletes performing a similar maneuver that did not result in an ACL disruption (controls). The COM_BOS, trunk(G) angle, and limb(G) angle (both relative to the gravity vector) were measured in the sagittal plane at initial ground-foot contact. A 2-way ANOVA (injury status × gender) was used to examine the hypotheses. RESULTS: There was a significant difference in all 3 measures based on injury status but not on gender. The COM_BOS, normalized by femur length, and limb(G) angle were greater (Δ = 0.9, P < .001 and Δ = 16°, P = .004, respectively), and the trunk(G) angle was smaller (Δ = 12°, P = .016) in the participants who sustained an ACL injury as compared with controls. The average COM was calculated as 38 cm more posterior relative to the BOS in the participants who sustained an ACL injury as compared with controls. CONCLUSION: Landing with the COM far posterior to the BOS may be a risk factor for noncontact ACL injury and potentially can be addressed in prevention programs.
Authors: Randy J Schmitz; Travis K Ficklin; Yohei Shimokochi; Anh-Dung Nguyen; Bruce D Beynnon; David H Perrin; Sandra J Shultz Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2008-06-05 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: Chen Hua Yeow; Chee Hoong Cheong; Kian Siang Ng; Peter Vee Sin Lee; James Cho Hong Goh Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2008-01-28 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: Julie Gilchrist; Bert R Mandelbaum; Heidi Melancon; George W Ryan; Holly J Silvers; Letha Y Griffin; Diane S Watanabe; Randall W Dick; Jiri Dvorak Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2008-08 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: Sandra J Shultz; Randy J Schmitz; Anne Benjaminse; Malcolm Collins; Kevin Ford; Anthony S Kulas Journal: J Athl Train Date: 2015-09-04 Impact factor: 2.860
Authors: Dai Sugimoto; Eduard Alentorn-Geli; Jurdan Mendiguchía; Kristian Samuelsson; Jon Karlsson; Gregory D Myer Journal: Sports Med Date: 2015-06 Impact factor: 11.136
Authors: Meghan L Critchley; Daniel J Davis; Michaela M Keener; Jacob S Layer; Margaret A Wilson; Qin Zhu; Boyi Dai Journal: Sports Biomech Date: 2019-04-04 Impact factor: 2.832
Authors: Grant E Norte; Taylor R Frendt; Amanda M Murray; Charles W Armstrong; Thomas J McLoughlin; Luke T Donovan Journal: J Athl Train Date: 2020-08-01 Impact factor: 2.860